Channel
@zh_cnpaog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,327subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002250313946 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zh_cnpaog |
| Created | Between 1 August 2024 and 31 January 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zh_cnpaog |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 2,327 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 2,328 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 2,333 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 2,333 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 1 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (1 November 2025 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 40 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
最新深夜福利频道如下⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ 1️⃣猎奇 人妻 ： @qiangjianf6 2️⃣吃瓜ღ猎奇： @lieqia8 3️⃣ 91 老司机 ： @qiangjianccc 4️⃣ 成人熟女 ： @qiangjianvk 5️⃣ 熟女人妻 ： @swagpxv 6️⃣ 偷拍淫妻 ： @jhelloworld_kaifa 7️⃣ 丝袜 乱伦 ： @iLook_world1688 8️⃣ 乱伦 强奸： @vHello_Gpt168 9️⃣ 商场 偷拍： @CEOHelpl ➡️少妇 淫妻： @chat007kefu_chat007kefu
File, posted without a caption
最新深夜福利频道如下⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ 1️⃣猎奇 人妻 ： @qiangjianf6 2️⃣吃瓜ღ猎奇： @lieqia8 3️⃣ 91 老司机 ： @qiangjianccc 4️⃣ 成人熟女 ： @qiangjianvk 5️⃣ 熟女人妻 ： @swagpxv 6️⃣ 偷拍淫妻 ： @jhelloworld_kaifa 7️⃣ 丝袜 乱伦 ： @iLook_world1688 8️⃣ 乱伦 强奸： @vHello_Gpt168
最新深夜福利频道如下⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ 1️⃣后入菊花➡️ @swagpxv 2️⃣偷情人妻➡️ @qiangjianvk 3️⃣国产视频➡️ @qiangjianccc
🚫📱 Telegram 手机端App 访问受限 ⚠️ 当前频道内容无法在 Telegram 手机端App 内查看。 🌐 请使用 Telegram 中文网页版 访问完整内容 🔓 解锁全部频道信息 📢 查看最新频道动态 🚀 获得最佳浏览体验 👇 点击立即查看此信息 https://im.telegram-org.xyz?message=goutui_sucail/13471
⭐️购买人设⭐️诚信为本⭐️素材分类⭐️国家明细 1️⃣人设套图【亚洲女】： @taotuddm1 2️⃣人设套图【亚洲男】： @taotuddm2 3️⃣人设套图【欧洲女】： @taotuddm3 4️⃣人设套图【欧洲男】： @taotuddm4 5️⃣人设套图【私密照】： @taotuddm5 6️⃣亚洲女证件 亚洲女】： @taotuddm6 7️⃣亚洲男证件 亚洲男】： @taotuddm7 8️⃣欧美女证件 欧洲女】： @taotuddm8 9️⃣欧美男证件 欧洲男】： @taotuddm9 🔖精聊话术素材 免费话术 ： @jingliao_huashw 1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣：【购买套图】请联系♥️叮当猫♥️： ➡️ @taotu56789 🟢🟢 商务合作投稿 广告投放👉联系 广告投放 分类清晰，方便查找！ 搜索方法：输入 “#关键词”，需要带上“#”号，例如 #国内 #香港 #台湾 等等！ 😄 …
精聊话术 整理了很多出来大家可以订阅后期更新。 精聊入金 精聊开客户 https://t.me/jingliao_huashw
最新深夜福利频道如下⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ 1️⃣后入菊花➡️ @hourujuhuab 2️⃣偷情人妻➡️ @touqingrenqix 3️⃣国产视频➡️ @lieqiaz 4️⃣熟女少妇➡️ @lieqiam 5️⃣成人熟女➡️ @lieqiax 6️⃣乱伦强奸➡️ @luanlunqiangjiani 7️⃣酒店监控➡️ @toupaichaodix 大哥大姐们可以先关注一下
素材频道如下⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ 【韩国素材】：➡️ @hanguosucaiz 【日本素材】：➡️ @ribensucaic 【美国素材】：➡️ @sucai1meiguo 【中国素材】：➡️ @sucai1zhongguo 【印度素材】：➡️ @sucai1yindu 【马来西亚素材】：➡️ @sucai1malaixiya 【翻译频道如下】⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ 【翻译器计数器】： ➡️ @HappyWorld009HappyWorld009 【取卡针全球跨境】： ➡️ @qukazhenqukazhen 【helloworld】： ➡️ @helloworld_kaifahelloworld_kaifa 【海王SCRM】： ➡️ @HaiWangAppHaiWangApp 【CC翻译】谷歌翻译： ➡️ @chatms…
私密树洞社区https://t.me/simiany
2026最新素材 https://t.me/wvsucai
全网最强翻译 Hello GPT 智能翻译 销冠必备 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 1️⃣翻译软件 2️⃣美洽翻译 3️⃣人设套图 4️⃣成人小说 5️⃣中国素材 6️⃣女神写真 7️⃣美图涩图 8️⃣海外素材
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @zh_cnpaog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,158,331 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@zh_cnpaog named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“zh_CN 中文翻译 中文安装 简体中文语言包 zh_cn” (@zh_cnpaog), 2,327 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zh_cnpaog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.