Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🎩🎈

@zeuspeak1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002780067842
TypeChannel
Username@zeuspeak1
Created11 September 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/zeuspeak1

Growth

147 August 2026 — 14 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13–15 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 01:1614no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:1414first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 11 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
438.1%
avg views ÷ 14 subscribers
Avg views / post
61.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held9 (11 September 202528 July 2026)
Views total184
Reactions total23
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

69 reactions across 8 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 59406621881621641821420.3%
custom 51883650409688088951115.9%
811.6%
custom 547450159049895269268.70%
custom 547444440730437215957.25%
custom 547435715074878109245.80%
❤‍🔥45.80%
🤡34.35%
custom 525147996334066011822.90%
custom 528096673489384482822.90%
custom 534354559380752164322.90%
custom 536881522716708785822.90%
🥰22.90%
custom 526712044752630142911.45%
custom 534845971929395481111.45%
custom 546307523802984864611.45%
🔥11.45%

Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2025 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 8 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zeuspeak1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 September 2025 to 28 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 01:12 UTC49 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52514799633406601182❤‍🔥1🔥1🤡1custom 52671204475263014291custom 53435455938075216431custom 54630752380298486461

20 Jul 2026, 16:16 UTC69 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

что делаете

🤡2🥰2custom 54743571507487810922❤‍🔥1

20 Jul 2026, 16:16 UTC66 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

всем привет

2custom 52809667348938448282custom 54743571507487810922❤‍🔥1custom 53435455938075216431

6 Apr 2026, 15:44 UTC176 views6 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

6

28 Jan 2026, 01:38 UTC339 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @markettwits

🌕#золото ЗОЛОТО = $5150 = новый рекорд mt в max

custom 54745015904989526926custom 51883650409688088952custom 59406621881621641822

25 Jan 2026, 04:26 UTC381 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🌟 🌟 https://t.me/boost/zeuspeak1

custom 59406621881621641826custom 51883650409688088953custom 54744444073043721592custom 53484597192939548111

25 Jan 2026, 04:22 UTC335 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 https://www.mexc.com/ru-RU/auth/signup?inviteCode=3Tc5D 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 https://bingxdao.com/invite/5GSGXD/ 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 @ooavg 🇷🇺

custom 51883650409688088956custom 59406621881621641826custom 54744444073043721593custom 53688152271670878582

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @zeuspeak1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🎩🎈” (@zeuspeak1), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zeuspeak1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.