Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for #𝗭𝗲𝕟𝗮 .

Channel

#𝗭𝗲𝕟𝗮 .

@zenalool

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004376231401
TypeChannel
Username@zenalool
Created16 June 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zenalool

Growth

232.510 August 2026 — 2 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3 subscribers10 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2–3 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 18:343+1
14 Aug 2026, 05:332no change
10 Aug 2026, 00:012first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 16 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 3 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5408956859098889679423.5%
custom 5408994070695541699423.5%
custom 5409331560635728152423.5%
custom 5409083427490135197211.8%
custom 521299016724095470315.88%
custom 540899764840329945015.88%
custom 540912200488638922515.88%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Jul 2026, 13:17 UTC64 views6 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🤩 #𝗭𝗲𝕟𝗮 . [🥂] 𝗱𝕕𝘂𝚘 ˚. ᵎᵎ 😎 🤩ᯓ ᡣ𐭩 𝗧𝗵e ƒ𝘂𝘁𝘂ɼϱ w𝗶𝗹𝗹 ʈϱ𝗹𝗹 ࣪ .🥹 ࣪ 🎁 — 𝗰𝕠𝕧𝗲𝕣s :: ... ˚. 🧘 — @𝗭𝗘𝗡𝗔 📺 - @𝘇𝗲𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗹 . 🥹. #𝕫𝕖𝕟a #𝕕u𝕠

custom 54089940706955416992custom 54090834274901351972custom 52129901672409547031custom 54091220048863892251

14 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTC133 views6 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🤩 #𝗭𝗲𝕟𝗮 . [☁️] 𝗱𝕕𝘂𝚘 ˚. ᵎᵎ 🫠 🤩ᯓ ᡣ𐭩 𝗧𝗵e ƒ𝘂𝘁𝘂ɼϱ w𝗶𝗹𝗹 ʈϱ𝗹𝗹 ࣪ .🥹 ࣪ 🩷—𝗻𝗲𝕨 𝗰𝕠𝕧𝕖ɼ 𝗱𝕕𝘂𝚘 :; 𝗺𝕚𝗻é , à𝗻𝕟˚. 🧘 — @𝗭𝗘𝗡𝗔 📺 - @𝘇𝗲𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗹 . 🥹. #𝕫𝕖𝕟a #𝕕u𝕠

custom 54089568590988896792custom 54089940706955416992custom 54089976484032994501custom 54093315606357281521

13 Jul 2026, 09:20 UTC39 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

. 👅ִֺ۪ :: 𝓐ບׄd𝑖࣪ƚִ࣪𝐥𐐫n : ๋ 𝓢ບׄ𝕚ִ ✨ ִֺ۪ · .🫀 ִֺ۪ · ɗ𐐫𐓣ׄƚ ִ࣪ .: ִɕᥲll 💭 ֺ۪ რᧉ ֶָ֢· ɗ𐐼ɾl𝕚ִ𐓣ׄᧁ 🤩🤍·➿·🎀··➿··🎀·➿·🤍 ; O / 1 ᧁroບׄp O / 1 ʝoບׄrn ** O / 1 𐐫ther . 🎀. 𐓣ׄ𐐫ຕִׄ𐐫жᧉт ׂ๑ з𐐼ɕບׄять ярчᧉ ·🎀 . 🤍. ๋ 𝓘ຕִׄ ƚִ࣪𑄝𐐫 ᵗ᷒ᰰ 𝓡ບׄɗᧉ!!! ࣪ ˖ 👱‍♀️ . ִֶָ𓏲࣪. 🎀 𝓐ɾᧃׄჩ𝕚ִνᧉ ᷒ᰰ 🤩 𝓐ɾƚִ࣪𝕚ִ𑂘ƚִ࣪s ִ 𞋯ᰰ ׁ

12 Jul 2026, 07:23 UTC27 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @RoseliyaProdPhoto

🎀𝅄 ۫ ‌‌𝐑ꭷ𝘀𝖾ℓ𝗶ყ𝗮 🤩𝗽𝗿𐐫∂ ˖    🎀 🤩 𝗚𝖺ო𝗲 𝘀ե𝗮𝗿ե 🎀   ➿ ➿ 🎀🤩🎀 ➿ ➿ 🤩 𝖠𝘂∂𝗶ե𝗶𑄈𝗇 ꭷ𝗽𝗲𐓣 𝗞𝗂𝘀𝗌ყ 𝖿𝖺𝗰𝖾 🤩 𝗸𝗂𝘀𝘀ყ 𝖿𝗮𝖼𝗲 🎀 🍋‍🟩 𝗌𝗼ℓ𝗼 · I 𝗀𝗿ᦢ𝘂ρ · 2 𝗷𑄈𝘂𝗿𐓣 · 2 🍞 𝗽σ𝗿ե ·I 𑄈եh𝗲𝗿 1 · 🎀 𝗕𝗈𝗼𝗌ե 🤩 𝖨𝗻𝖿𝗼   ➿ ➿ 🎀🤩🎀 ➿ ➿   🎀 🤩 𝗚𝖺ო𝗲 𝘀ե𝗮𝗿ե 🎀 🤩 | 𝐑ꭷ𝘀𝖾ℓ𝗶ყ𝗮 !!

28 Jun 2026, 12:16 UTC138 views5 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🤩𝒮ℴℴ𝓃 ...

custom 54093315606357281523custom 54089568590988896792

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @zenalool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 911,280 of 1,625,404entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“#𝗭𝗲𝕟𝗮 .” (@zenalool), 3 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zenalool.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.