Channel
@zemaalla
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,627subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001215661458 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zemaalla |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zemaalla |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 3,627 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 3,630 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 3,631 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 3,631 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 18 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
188 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 108 | 57.4% | |
| 🔥 | 74 | 39.4% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.60% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.60% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2025 to 5 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А вот это вообще другой уровень Сейчас у блогеров это супер-тренд такие залипательные фотки Реально проще один раз научиться и делать самой Тем более, если разобраться, это ещё и классная ниша для заработка, потому что многим лень обучаться , а быть в тренде хочется и они готовы за это платить. Я реально подсела на это,сижу вечерами,генерю разные фотки и видео Пишите свои идеи в комментариях (у меня пока вдохнов…
❤19
На фотосессию 🙈 Хотела красивые кадры в разных образах, чтобы и на аватарку, и для контента Но потом включилась логика (и внутренняя жаба 🐸) и я решила, почему бы не попробовать сделать всё самой)) И вот результат 😏👇 Все эти фото я сделала сама, без фотографа, без студии, без визажиста!! Просто с помощью нейросетей!! И самое кайфовое, что фотки реально выглядят как настоящие Никаких вот этих пластиковых лиц, на …
❤10
Девочки,ситуэйшн,как обычно уже готова была заплатить 20–30 тысяч 😅 (ну как обычно,знаете,вроде понимаешь,что дорого,но хочется результат. Угадаете, на что? 👇🏻
❤6
Второе: у меня есть канал,где я продаю свои новые или почти новые вещи♥️ Подписывайтесь ♥️♥️♥️
Корсет 2mimor Размер S На молнии,не на шнуровке,что оч удобно и не надо никого просить завязать его. 2500 р
❤4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤14🔥3
Прикиньте,я забыла,что у меня еще и эта страница есть. ШОК😂 Кто-то тут есть? Пссс?
🔥67❤8😁3
Я из дома не выхожу без губ . Накрашенных,конечно же 😄 Ловите рекомендашку от меня - блески от бренда Divage😍 У меня оттенки 03 и 05 ,очень офигенные. 03 оттенок более нюдовый, а 05 более яркий ,ягодного оттенка. У них шикарный состав (масло ши ,масло миндаля,масло какао ), который увлажняет губы, за счёт этого они смотрятся очень напитанными и красивыми 🥰 И еще важный момент для меня- блеск совсем не липкий ✨ Ссы…
❤16👍3
Целое утро читаю приятности 📹
❤31🔥4
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @zemaalla. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 929,115 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алла Земскова” (@zemaalla), 3,627 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zemaalla.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.