@zedmasoni
👍229👎35
Signed Mostafa robatjazi

Channel
@zedmasoni
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,594subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001065093305 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zedmasoni |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zedmasoni |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 3,594 | +4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 3,590 | +11 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 3,579 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 3,578 | +3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 3,575 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:22 | 3,570 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 3,576 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 3,576 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 April 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,339 reactions across 19 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,181 | 88.2% | |
| 👎 | 158 | 11.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,339reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2021 to 27 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
@zedmasoni
👍229👎35
Signed Mostafa robatjazi
@zedmasoni
👍301👎34
Signed Mostafa robatjazi
@zedmasoni
👍55👎7
هرم و چشم هوروس “ Illuminati ” هرم یک فرم قدیمی است که بر اساس قداست(مقدس بودن) عدد 3 نسبت به ادیان ، رمز و راز باستان بنا شده است ، به طور خاص برای فراخوانی اهریمنی یا غیبی مورد استفاده قرار میگرفته. @zedmasoni
👍45👎3
نظم نوین جهانی - بخش آخر آنها انسان های واقعا آموزش دیده یا خودآموخته ای که قادرند منتقدانه فکر کنند یا اهداف معنوی دارند را نمیخواهند. خیر، این انسان ها برای تشکیلات آنان یک خطر محسوب میشوند. آنها فقط ربات های مطیعی میخواهند که هوششان تنها تا حدی باشد که بتوانند با ماشین آلات کار کنند و آنقدر کودن باشند که هیچگاه هیچ چیز را زیر سوال نبرند. تمام مشکلات بزرگ جهان ریشه در این «طاعونِ مالی» دارند. جنگ ها، سودده هستند،…
👍55👎10
نظم نوین جهانی قسمت سوم @zedmasoni
👍23👎4
نظم نوین جهانی - بخش دوم گروه های مخفی زیادی در جهان در حال انجام وظیفه به عنوان شاخه هایی از یک ابرشرکت هستند که توسط 13 خانواده ی سلطنتی در راس هرم کنترل میشود. گرچه اعضای این انجمن های مخفی بخاطر خدمات خود پاداش های زیادی میگیرند اما آنها از اعضای خونیِ خانواده های سلطنتی نیستند و برخی از آنان حتی نمیدانند که اربابان حقیقیشان کیستند و از نقشه ی کلی و اصلیِ آنها اطلاع چندانی ندارند. یکی دیگر از ابزارهایی که برای …
👍37👎2
نظم نوین جهانی قسمت دوم ☆☆☆بسیار مهم☆☆☆ @zedmasoni
👍13
نظم نوین جهانی - بخش اول نیروهای سایه و دستان پشت پرده در حال پیش بردن برنامه ای آرام و قدم به قدم برای تسلط کامل بر تمام بشریت و منابع سیاره هستند و اسم آن برنامه را «نظم نوین جهانی» گذاشته اند.از آنجا که این پروسه بطور زیرکانه و آرامی در حال پیش رفتن است و همچنان ذهن عامه ی مردم مشغول سرگرمی ها، حواس پرتی ها و... میباشد،آنها بدون آنکه مردم بویی ببرند،آزادی شان را از آنها می ربایند و در عوض قدرت سیستم بیشتر و بیشتر…
👍40👎3
نظم نوین جهانی قسمت اول @zedmasoni
👍20👎3
اسامی اعضای قدیمی وجدید کمیته ۳۰۰؛؛ . 1.مارکیس ابرگاومی 2.دین آچسن 3.لرد مایکل 4.جیووانی اگنلی 5.دوک البا 6.لرد الدینگوتن 7.میگوئل المان 8.پروفسور تی. ای الیبون 9.خانواده السوپ 10.هایتون آمور 11.چارلز.ای اندرسن 12.رابرت.او اندرسن 13.دواین اندرسن 14.لرد اسکویث 15.اورانگ زب 16.پال استین 17.سر رانولف باکو 18.آرتور بالفور 19.لرد بالوگ 20.بارون استورمونت بانکروفت 21.بارینگ 22.بی بارناتو 23.سر جان باران 24. سر پیتر باکسند…
👍35👎2
کمیته ۳۰۰کانون توطئه جهانی کمیته ۳۰۰ متشکل از بیلدربرگها وتحت نفوذ خاندان ۱۳ تاج اهدافی را دنبال می کنند و این تشکیلات که نفوذی در دولتها غربی داشته است و بطوری که تمام تصمیم گیری ها موجود سران دولتهای غربی از درون این انجمن است کمیته ۳۰۰ فراماسونی همان ایلومناتی ها هستند که بصورت دکترین سایه در دولتها نفوذ دارند اما در دولت امریکا شورای روابط عالی کار تصمیم گیری بعهده دارد که مستقیم با اعضای کمیته ۳۰۰در ارتب…
👍33
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zedmasoni. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
موافق ایجاد کامنت گذاری در پست ها هستید؟
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2021 to 27 January 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ضد فراماسونری و شیطان پرستی” (@zedmasoni), 3,594 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zedmasoni.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.