Channel
@zeddsjh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,461subscribers
+242 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003707979384 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zeddsjh |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zeddsjh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 1,461 | +79 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 1,382 | +35 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 1,347 | +102 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 1,245 | +26 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 1,219 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 August 2026 – 20 August 2026) |
| Views total | 287 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
7 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 7 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✈️ KkPay 匿名钱包 @kkpay ◾️ 0手续费匿名转账 - 基于 Telegram 内部匿名转账 ◾️ 闪兑 - U=>TRX,U=>TON,TRX=>U - 点击下方按钮 "💱 闪兑" ◾️ 发红包 - 基于 Telegram 在群组发红包 - 点击下方按钮 "🧧 红包" ◾️ 电报会员/星星 - 自助充值，秒充秒到 - 点击下方按钮 "💎 电报会员/星星" ◾️ 白资人民币提现 - 保证白资，费率低 - 点击下方按钮 "¥ 提现白资人民币"
⚠️今天我整合了挂圈各大热门频道！ ❤️以下频道是挂圈热门频道大合集 1️⃣仁济改文件. 2️⃣小月改文件. 3️⃣HTY改文件. 4️⃣公益内核破解. 5️⃣TG高速公益代理. 6️⃣期九期改文件. 以下为互推赞助商⬇️ ‼️😙还在当直装仔被嘲笑吗 别人已经找教父来买Root机当大牛 ‼️ 点击一键加入查看教父root机 惩戒他人,保护自己 开户查档专用软件 100%秒出14亿全国人口数据库/免费开户. ⚠️户籍猎手已公益
👍1
📱你还在担心你的频道没时间管理吗 只需要一个管理位我就可以帮你管理频道 想找公益封号思路的频道？想找可以开户查档的频道？想找优质号商的频道？想找经常送福利可以白嫖各种账号 靓号 nft 红包的频道？ ✅秋辞集团专业互推/团队运营 🔝高效上人速度/免费引流 各平台账号源头卡网😃 https://4xg.66url.cn/qhN 点击链接一键加入高质量频道合集
👍1
秋辞互推（2026年08月20日）频道推荐 和泉纱雾 · 主频道 幕屿飞机业务/飞机账号/僵尸🧟♀️/会员代开/礼物代购 七辰官方频道 七小辰官方频道 七辰改文件🇨🇳 七辰的小窝 七辰项目导航[唯一正版] 七辰内核主频道 纵情数据号(免费数据号) 百度直装(公益) 开心的泛滥小屋 秋小鹤八级号【官方正版】 🍀𝐶𝑙𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝐶𝘩𝑒𝑎𝑡 作弊频道 小九号商频道 七辰的朋友圈 和粟薰子八级号 七辰主频道 顾北高质量数据号【免费数据号】 魔芋爽资源分享 和泉纱雾反馈频道 和泉纱雾 · 副频道 高速代理 | 飞机代理 | 公益代理 和粟熏子主频道 【先看置顶】 厚焰授权号(授权号超级大降价) JINX CHEAT 作恶多端数据号『高质量首选🎉』 和粟薰子聊天群 雾岛董香数据号（进频道就送） 北斗云互联 仙鹤免root公益美化频道 上善若水万能搜索🔍 作恶多端数据号『高质量首选🎉』 仙鹤冰快手领域 雾岛董香公益项目主频道 困困TG日记 …
v区扫码号所有库存已补🌹
🪶作恶多端数据号『全网最低价！』🪶 【各种极品数据号低至0.5！】🎮🎮 🔥99%都是高质量皮肤套装🔥 ✅100%不鉴别/不人脸/不封号✅ ⚠️所有账号问题都包售后⚠️ ✅介绍:和平低价直登号/授权数据号/微信扫码号 ‼️请在购买付款时开启录屏‼️ ♥️24小时自助提卡网： 卡网1: https://wkaiw.oqzgb.com/shop/zeddnb 卡网2: https://wkaiw.oqzgb.com/shop/zeddnb 👍唯一售后客服 @zeddnb6 📱唯一正版频道: @zeddnb8 🔥进入每周免费发放100+数据号频道 🔥进入每周免费发放100+数据号频道 🔥进入每周免费发放100+数据号频道 📱数据号通知频道【务必加入】 https://t.me/zeddnb6 ⚠️二卖出门被车撞死⚠️ ⚠️圈钱出门被车撞死⚠️ 🪶点我做任务免费白嫖数据号🪶
回头客真实反馈！嘎嘎极品质量就完事儿了🤺
👍1
互推稍后重新换一个脚本 现在正在测试 请频道主 重新提交 劳烦各位了 @QIUCIHUTUIBOT
📱你还在担心你的频道没时间管理吗 只需要一个管理位我就可以帮你管理频道 想找公益封号思路的频道？想找可以开户查档的频道？想找优质号商的频道？想找经常送福利可以白嫖各种账号 靓号 nft 红包的频道？ ✅秋辞集团专业互推/团队运营 🔝高效上人速度/免费引流 各平台账号源头卡网😃 https://4xg.66url.cn/qhN 点击链接一键加入高质量频道合集
👍1
作恶多端数据号『高质量首选🎉』 pinned «https://t.me/cd777?start=ODg4NjE2NzU2NQ== 兄弟们给大家发福利了 开户机器人注册就送两次开户机会 再也不用担心没有几分了 点击链接注册机器人»
https://t.me/cd777?start=ODg4NjE2NzU2NQ== 兄弟们给大家发福利了 开户机器人注册就送两次开户机会 再也不用担心没有几分了 点击链接注册机器人
👍1
回头客地铁直接开出1.8亿存款！认准就完事儿了，还要啥自行车😋
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zeddsjh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
给供货商屌了一顿，是否要重新安排全网最低价？？？
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 897,168 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@zeddsjh named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小琪和平项目『高质量首选🎉』” (@zeddsjh), 1,461 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zeddsjh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.