Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Psixologiya_Online

Channel

Psixologiya_Online

@zebosalidjanova

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,739subscribers

-145 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001422567965
TypeChannel
Username@zebosalidjanova
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zebosalidjanova

Growth

5,7395,8935,8167 August 2026 — 5,884 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,884 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,893 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,875 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,863 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,828 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,812 subscribers23 August 2026 — 5,776 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,739 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 20 days, net -145. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,716–5,916 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 06:125,739-37
23 Aug 2026, 23:155,776-36
20 Aug 2026, 15:435,812-16
17 Aug 2026, 19:465,828-35
15 Aug 2026, 01:125,863-12
11 Aug 2026, 14:385,875-18
8 Aug 2026, 13:505,893+9
7 Aug 2026, 14:465,884no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:395,884first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.74%
avg views ÷ 5,739 subscribers
Avg views / post
502
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.494%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held18 (3 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total9,031
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

26 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1973.1%
👏311.5%
👍27.69%
🤩27.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC299 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/moony_kidsuz Qizla tayyor maktab formala arzon narxlaga borikan🥹❤️‍🔥

👍2

10 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC343 viewsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

Kim yana maktab bozorli qildi🫠 nech pulga tushtila😅

10 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC336 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Farzandingiz maktabga nafaqat bilim bilan, balki ruhiy jihatdan ham tayyor bo‘lsin. 🤍 Shu mashqlarni saqlab qo‘ying va 1-sentabrgacha bola bilan birga bajaring.

1

8 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC439 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Nega muammo bo‘lmasa ham ichingizda nimadir bo‘ladigandek xavotirda bo‘lasiz? Eng g‘alati tomoni — siz nimadan xavotir olayotganingizni ham aniq bilmaysiz. Shunchaki ichingizda bir “tayyor tur” degan holat bor. ‼️Telefon jiringlasa — yomon xabar deb o‘ylaysiz. ‼️Kimdir “gaplashib olaylik” desa — yuragingiz siqiladi. ‼️Eringiz kechroq kelsa — xayolingiz darrov eng yomon variantlarga ketadi. Hatto hammasi yaxshi keta

3

7 Aug 2026, 04:34 UTC525 viewsread 12 August 2026

https://t.me/+k19trWxYeao0MzU6 Master klass shu kanalda bo'ladi qizlajonla❤️‍🔥❤️😍

7 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC482 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

5

6 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC560 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Xiyonatni kechirish kerakmi? Ko’pchilik bu savolga shoshilib javob beradi. “Ha, oila uchun kechirish kerak.” Yoki… "Yo’q, xiyonatning kechirimi yo’q.” Lekin psixolog sifatida aytaman… Bu savolning o’zi noto’g’ri. To’g’ri savol esa: Xiyonat qilgan inson o’zgardimi? U qilgan ishi uchun chin dildan mas’uliyatni oldimi? Yoki faqat ushlanib qolgani uchun afsusdami? Chunki… Kechirish munosabatni saqlab qolmaydi.

6 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC440 viewsread 10 August 2026

Qizla mehnatimmi qadrlab yozvotgan har bitta otzivila uchun rahmat❤️ Doim o'qib xursand bo'laman🥹❤️‍🔥

4 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTC671 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

Oxirgi postimdan keyin kelgan izohlar "bu aynan mening holatim, qanday yo'l tutsam yechim bo'la oladi deb yozilgandi... Shuning uchun sizlar uchun shunchaki maslahatlar emas, balki amaliy mashqlardan iborat terapevtik workbook tayyorladim. Bundan tashqari siz uchun 5 kunlik MARAFON🧲💃🏻 💞 “Erkak ketmaydigan ayol bo‘lishni xohlaysizmi?” Demak bu 5 kunlik kuchli darslar to‘plamini siz uchun: 📌 1-kun | Erkak nega sov

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @zebosalidjanova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Psixologiya_Online” (@zebosalidjanova), 5,739 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zebosalidjanova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.