Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Blog

Channel

Blog

@zeblog1337

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,042subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002066724350
TypeChannel
Username@zeblog1337
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zeblog1337

Growth

3,0423,0623,0527 August 2026 — 3,062 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,061 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,058 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,052 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,044 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,043 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,046 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,044 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,042 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 22 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,039–3,065 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 17:173,042-2
26 Aug 2026, 19:243,044-2
23 Aug 2026, 08:433,046+3
19 Aug 2026, 21:583,043-1
16 Aug 2026, 21:253,044-8
13 Aug 2026, 22:283,052-6
10 Aug 2026, 19:163,058-3
7 Aug 2026, 21:103,061-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:183,062first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,048 reactions across 20 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣99132.5%
60119.7%
😭2688.79%
😢1996.53%
💔1655.41%
🔥1244.07%
🤡983.22%
🖕943.08%
😁923.02%
👎752.46%
👍481.57%
🤔371.21%
💩250.82%
👻220.722%
🕊200.656%
🤯180.591%
😡140.459%
👏130.427%
🍌120.394%
🌚110.361%
23 further kinds1213.97%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,048reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2025 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2026, 23:20 UTC≈1,720 views116 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Someone give me a rundown of what's happened with the COD cheat market for the last year t.me/PhantomOverlay I've been away in Belize

🔥68🤯1611🤔6👾4🤮4💩2💯2

10 Jul 2026, 23:19 UTC≈1,730 views71 reactionsread 8 August 2026

People to this day still reference how filthy zebleer's room is not realizing this is a picture I got online of Asmongold's room Trust me my room doesn't look like that. Mine's worse

34😭12😁6🔥5🤡3🤣3🌚2🤨2

11 May 2025, 19:06 UTC≈9,000 views211 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣133🖕20🔥15😢12👍6👻6🕊5😁5

24 Apr 2025, 21:48 UTC≈9,680 views304 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

123🤣92🖕31🤔20😁9🔥7🌚5🐳5

7 Apr 2025, 22:53 UTC≈11,600 views324 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😭145🤣7238😢29💩12👎10😁6🌭4

3 Apr 2025, 02:59 UTC≈11,100 views328 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Gonna finally clean my room now that I have a break after all these busy years

🤣213😭34🖕2018🔥16🕊10😁7👏4

17 Mar 2025, 17:57 UTC≈7,820 views58 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @PhantomOverlayAnnouncements

I've just issued a lot of refunds payment processor side: BO6 external There were many renewal charges that occurred a few days after March 1 that weren't supposed to be able to occur. These renewal charges came with no delivery of a key. I fixed the bug quickly to stop the charges but never issued the refunds for the existing charges until now ✅ All of those renewal charges without a key delivery have been refunded

😢2517🤡10👍6

10 Mar 2025, 17:37 UTC≈8,990 views303 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣233😁21🤡16😭8💩65😈5👎3

8 Mar 2025, 19:18 UTC≈6,180 views119 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @PhantomOverlayAnnouncements

Some clarifications 👻🎉 — I did not want to close PO. I wanted to keep running PO, but something happened that forced me to close it — My comments about passion and the community were not related to what caused the PO closure — I have done my best to send COD external/DMA cheaters to great new homes. At this time, I do not know where to send CS2/OW2 users, but I am still looking — Anyone who paid 250 euros for BO6

70🤡25😢9👎6👍3🍌2🤔2👏1

5 Mar 2025, 18:50 UTC≈8,640 views171 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

This guy just knocked on my door and left when I didn't answer... What's going on???

🤣115😁14👻87🤡7🤔6🕊5👀4

5 Mar 2025, 18:45 UTC≈8,030 views99 reactionsread 8 August 2026

These conspiracy theories are getting juicy

🤣63😁14🤡10👍3💯3👀2🔥1🥰1

5 Mar 2025, 18:44 UTC≈8,020 views106 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣56👎14😁10🤡95👀5🤔3😭2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zeblog1337. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Blog” (@zeblog1337), 3,042 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zeblog1337.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.