Video message, posted without a caption
custom 51884948778301780264custom 54651298000604000014custom 53728733141317958563

Channel
@zdes_elizabeth
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
161subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001109194573 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zdes_elizabeth |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 30 November 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zdes_elizabeth |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 06:58 | 161 | -1 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 162 | +10 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 152 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 151 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 150 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 148 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 148 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
41 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5465129800060400001 | 19 | 46.3% | |
| custom 5372873314131795856 | 8 | 19.5% | |
| custom 5188494877830178026 | 6 | 14.6% | |
| custom 5377740744733775135 | 4 | 9.76% | |
| custom 5447152346859599326 | 4 | 9.76% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 51884948778301780264custom 54651298000604000014custom 53728733141317958563
Почему Ekonika выбрала именно Роузи Хантингтон-Уайтли 30 июля Ekonika представила осенне-зимнюю коллекцию 2026 года «Новая классика», главной героиней рекламной кампании которой стала Роузи Хантингтон-Уайтли. Кампанию снимали в парижском дворце XVIII века. Роузи появляется среди парадных лестниц и классических интерьеров в длинных пальто, высоких сапогах и остроносых туфлях, с сумками строгой геометрической формы. В…
custom 54651298000604000014custom 53728733141317958563custom 51884948778301780262
Сицилийская вдова: как траур стал основой эстетики Dolce & Gabbana Один из самых устойчивых образов Dolce & Gabbana вырос не из вечерней моды и не из голливудского представления об итальянской красоте. Его источник — повседневная траурная одежда женщин юга Италии. На Сицилии вдова могла носить чёрное много лет, а иногда до конца жизни. Такой костюм обозначал не только личную утрату. Он сообщал о новом общественном …
custom 54471523468595993264custom 54651298000604000014custom 53777407447337751352
Почему зелёный стал одним из главных цветов женского костюма в кино Если собрать самые известные женские образы мирового кинематографа, быстро обнаружится закономерность: среди десятков культовых костюмов снова и снова появляется зелёное платье. Клеопатра, Скарлетт О’Хара, Сесилия из «Искупления», Анна Болейн в исполнении Натали Портман, героини Одри Хепбёрн, Эммы Стоун — этот список можно продолжать. Совпадение м…
custom 54651298000604000017custom 53728733141317958562custom 53777407447337751352
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @zdes_elizabeth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЗДЕСЬ С ЭЛИЗАБЕТ” (@zdes_elizabeth), 161 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zdes_elizabeth.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.