Channel
@zcxw0
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,511subscribers
-61 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001415304835 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zcxw0 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zcxw0 |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @xw186/173076 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC | @zcxw0/89469 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xw186/173086 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC | @zcxw0/89470 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xw186/173096 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC | @zcxw0/89471 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xw186/173106 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC | @zcxw0/89472 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xw186/173126 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC | @zcxw0/89474 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xw186/173156 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC | @zcxw0/89477 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @xw186 | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (8–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @xw186. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 3,511 | -28 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:55 | 3,539 | -31 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 3,570 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 3,572 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (6 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 126 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#泰国：警方揪出“中国灰产右手” 涉嫌接收诈骗赃款兑换USDT，涉案资金超5480万泰铢】 8月6日，泰国曼谷第8警区宣布，警方成功逮捕29岁的嫌犯关昌·谢（音译）。该嫌犯因涉嫌参与犯罪组织、窝藏犯罪集团及共同洗钱，被吞武里刑事法院签发逮捕令。警方在曼谷一处公寓将其抓获，并查获现金50万泰铢、手机2部（内含大量将诈骗赃款兑换USDT后转交中国老板的记录）、氯胺酮2.56克、“快乐水”DU品5包共36.12克，以及汽车1辆。 警方调查发现，此前已捣毁一伙专门负责替电信诈骗集团提取现金的“提款车手”团伙，并在追查资金流向时锁定关昌。警方称，他负责接收车手提取的诈骗赃款，暂时保管后送往地下换汇点及中国人聚居区的非法加密货币兑换点，将现金兑换成USDT等数字货币，再转交幕后中国老板完成洗钱。 警方长期跟踪后发现，关昌日前再次前往曼谷Seacon Square购物中心接收另一批诈骗赃款，随后联合相关部门展开收网行动，先后抓获两名提款…
.缅甸新闻/亚太新闻/东南亚新闻 pinned a video
🤣😂🤣😁东方汇国际娱乐赌场🙄 🤣😂🤣😁有国家政府批准合法合规注册经营许可证的大型国际赌场🙄 ➡️首存赠送🤨♠️♠️🎲，最高🕉♐️♐️♐️元 🎲🎲🎲存款有礼 ，返利 🎲🎲 现金存款有礼 最高可送🕉🎲 😳主营：AG视讯，PG电子，JDB电子，CQ9电子，PNG电子，PP电子，MG电子😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳 ➡️充值提现支持：😟😉😞😊微信、支付宝、网银转账、🎲🎲🎲，多种支付快捷方式 😳官方游戏下载注册网址：https://web.877798.com:3306/login/?&pid=52514011 😳游戏上下分群：https://t.me/+pSjLGTcVNHY4YTdl 😳下载注册教程：https://t.me/DFHYL18/31 😳更多福利尽在东方汇📴 传送门 ➡️🙄 东方汇娱乐简介🙄 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀
#网友投稿：#迪拜 离职赔付后被公司恶意拉黑 我正常交完赔付离职，公司一分钱都没拖欠我。结果一个月后人资突然说赔付算错了，我去面试其他部门才发现自己被拉黑了。这他妈合理吗？ 公司那帮主管一个正常人没有，有些职缺居然得陪主管睡觉才能拿到，恶心到爆的垃圾公司，大家赶紧避雷。以上曝光这些主管的主要据点。 #5G吃瓜 搞笑视频 😂 导航联盟 🧭 东南亚风景 🇲🇲
#韩国 诈骗团伙逃离 #柬埔寨 转战 #越南 失败 岘港落网后被押解回国受审 近日，据越南有关部门消息，一伙此前在柬埔寨边境地区活动的韩国籍跨国网络诈骗犯罪团伙，在企图将犯罪据点转移至越南境内时，被越南警方成功侦破。目前，涉案韩国籍主要嫌疑人已被依法移交韩国执法部门，并押解返回韩国接受进一步调查和审判。 调查显示，该团伙此前长期盘踞于柬埔寨境内相关诈骗园区，利用网络技术实施针对海外受害者的电信网络诈骗活动。其中，犯罪人员涉嫌使用“深度伪造”（Deepfake）等技术手段伪装身份，通过虚假感情关系、投资理财诱导等方式，对韩国等国家民众实施所谓“杀猪盘”诈骗。 警方调查发现，该团伙不仅涉嫌诈骗大量资金，同时还涉及非法控制人员、扣押证件、限制自由以及强迫他人从事网络诈骗活动等违法犯罪行为。 随着近年来柬埔寨及周边国家持续加强对跨境电信诈骗、网络犯罪园区的打击力度，大量非法诈骗组织生存空间受到压缩。为躲避执法追查，该团伙部分核心…
#网友投稿 ：今天下午，#老挝 #金三角 特外一大批狗推提桶跑路了 根据现场网友反馈：当时这种皮卡满载狗推，车里坐5个，车斗装6个，好几辆车往会赛方向开。 #5G吃瓜 搞笑视频 😂 导航联盟 🧭 东南亚风景 🇲🇲
#芒果园区 或被改造为全柬诈骗物证库 今天，实居省警方配合柬埔寨国家打击网络诈骗委员会工作组，前往位于基里隆县3号国道沿线的“金鸿园区”（原为芒果园区）进行实地检查。 该园区此前因涉嫌网络诈骗犯罪已被依法实施临时封禁。此次检查旨在筹备并修复该场所，将其改建为专门存放全国各地查获的网诈案涉案物证的标准技术保管库。 #5G吃瓜 搞笑视频 😂 导航联盟 🧭 东南亚风景 🇲🇲
#网友投稿 你们五人跑路公司路费，不上班还钱直接跑路，一直说还钱这么多天了毛都没见到，15号之前不换钱就不打码了。不要把自己的路走短了。 #5G吃瓜 搞笑视频 😂 导航联盟 🧭 东南亚风景 🇲🇲
#曼谷 联合国办事处前 缅民众抗议敏昂莱访泰 8月6日，一批缅甸民众聚集在曼谷联合国办事处前，抗议缅甸军政府领导人敏昂莱访问泰国。 抗议者谴责军政府的暴力行径，并主要呼吁泰国政府不应给予敏昂莱官方认可，同时要求联合国等国际社会明确站在缅甸人民一边。 #5G吃瓜 搞笑视频 😂 导航联盟 🧭 东南亚风景 🇲🇲
.缅甸新闻/亚太新闻/东南亚新闻 pinned a video
🤣😂🤣😁东方汇国际娱乐赌场🙄 🤣😂🤣😁有国家政府批准合法合规注册经营许可证的大型国际赌场🙄 ➡️首存赠送🤨♠️♠️🎲，最高🕉♐️♐️♐️元 🎲🎲🎲存款有礼 ，返利 🎲🎲 现金存款有礼 最高可送🕉🎲 😳主营：AG视讯，PG电子，JDB电子，CQ9电子，PNG电子，PP电子，MG电子😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳 ➡️充值提现支持：😟😉😞😊微信、支付宝、网银转账、🎲🎲🎲，多种支付快捷方式 😳官方游戏下载注册网址：https://web.877798.com:3306/login/?&pid=52514011 😳游戏上下分群：https://t.me/+pSjLGTcVNHY4YTdl 😳下载注册教程：https://t.me/DFHYL18/31 😳更多福利尽在东方汇📴 传送门 ➡️🙄 东方汇娱乐简介🙄 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀
缅甸军方突查纳散镇中国电诈团伙，知情人士透露实为“摆拍作秀” 8月5日：据报道，缅甸军政府军队在南部掸邦纳散镇纳扬村（Nar Yine）附近地区，对一处中国电信诈骗团伙的大本营展开了突击搜查，该区域处于纳扬民兵团的控制之下。 军方资讯显示，此次行动共抓获了38名与电诈团伙相关的中国籍人员以及43名劳工，并缴获了1栋建筑物、多支枪支、67部手机、电脑、6套星链装置及相关运营工具。 然而，接近纳散镇军方的知情人士透露，由于网路幕后老板拒绝支付被索要的利益分成，此次行动仅仅是一次象征性的“走过场”。被捕人员大多只是普通劳工，而真正的幕后老板并未落网。 知情人士还补充称，该电诈据点自2025年初开始运营，当地军方及民兵武装对其实际存在一直心知肚明。 自“1027行动”后，曾盘踞在掸邦北部的中国电诈网路已分散至掸邦各地，并至今仍在许多区域继续活动。 #5G吃瓜 搞笑视频 😂 导航联盟 🧭 东南亚风景 🇲🇲
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @zcxw0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 43,960 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“.缅甸新闻/亚太新闻/东南亚新闻” (@zcxw0), 3,511 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zcxw0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.