Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for zazvesdilsya💀 BIG BALLS.

Channel

zazvesdilsya💀 BIG BALLS.

@zazvesdilsya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

211subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002256277012
TypeChannel
Username@zazvesdilsya
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zazvesdilsya

Growth

2092112109 August 2026 — 209 subscribers10 August 2026 — 210 subscribers17 August 2026 — 211 subscribers9 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 209–211 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 11:16211+1
10 Aug 2026, 19:16210+1
9 Aug 2026, 23:46209first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.6%
avg views ÷ 211 subscribers
Avg views / post
68.8
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held10 (3 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total688
Reactions total85
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

85 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4957.6%
❤‍🔥1011.8%
👾78.24%
💘78.24%
💋67.06%
🍓33.53%
🍾33.53%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTC19 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @OkiieeeeeeeeeeePhoto

🌟 💤 С днём рождения меня !! 💤 🌟 Вот наконец то настал этот важный для меня день! Я очень рада, что смогу провести его по особенному и исполнить одну из своих небольших детских мечт 🤩〰️ Хочу выразить огромную благодарность всем людям, что были рядом со мной в течение этого года, что помогли мне раскрыться по новому и лучше понять себя.🤩 Вы самые лучшие !! А также хочу сказать спасибо и вам, подписчикам. Честно гово

5

6 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC45 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @pikniknpPhoto

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔢🔢🔢🔢🔢🔢🔢🔢🔢🔢 ⭐️⭐️⭐️ В чём прикол спецгостя на нашем мероприятии? ⭐️⭐️⭐️ Мы заметили, что к нам приходят люди с аудиторией, художники, косплееры, контент мейкеры по фандому и гости об этом знают, но не все могут обнаружить их в толпе, поэтому специально для вас, мы распечатаем бейджики, чтобы вас могли узнать ------------------------- ------------ ---- Чтобы стать 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 просто напишите нам в сообщения канала

3

5 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC86 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Господи помоги 😱 На индиконе не развернусь, крылышки кфс получаются больше, чем ожидалось 🐱 #wip #cosplay

11❤‍🔥1🍾1

5 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC73 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @k_smuz

Так же вижу много вопросов касательно того, что в программу все таки входят фандомы не инди Отвечаем: заполнить ВСЮ программу только инди фд было бы не реальным везением для нас, тогда можно было бы говорить, что мы популяризовали их на столько, что уже можно давать интервью и становится продюссерами Но приоритет не приравнивается к запрету У нас могут быть номера с другими фд Мы дружелюбны к гостевым вселенным, мы

2

5 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC46 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @hokoinlivePhoto

И так, настало время моей днюхи. Мне стукает 23 и за этот год случилось довольно много всего, даже самой не верится, насколько. Начиная от первого косплея, заканчивая буквально переездом в другой город за тысячи километров от дома. Думаю, это был удачный год, не смотря на многие сомнительные негативные моменты. Лично для меня он был хорошим. Что касаемо творчества от рисования я действительно немного отошла в поль

3

5 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC78 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Самое позорное, что пишут то абсолютно публично. Я точно также публично заявляю, что это неадекватное поведение маленьких обиженок, которые не понимают куда подаются и наивно думают, что все двери им открыты, так ещё и не умеющие принимать отказы😐 #shitpost

9👾3

5 Aug 2026, 09:57 UTC82 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

А вот опускаться до угроз в духе "пожалеют о том, что взяли картонок и пиксельных черепушек" и прочие более низкие угрозы куратору косплея, показывает ваше гнилое нутро и то, что вас мало в конкурс нельзя допускать, так вообще к посещению мероприятия, так как вы неадекватные кадры🚬 #shitpost

6👾4

5 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC83 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ситуация с индиконом показательна. Многие просто не читают регламент. Мероприятие посвящено вселенным инди-игр и инди-анимаций, творчеству комьюнити — упор идёт на таких участников. Допускаются персонажи из ретро и ААА-видеоигр, а также настольных игр. Персонажи из студийных мультфильмов, аниме, фильмов, сериалов, комиксов и книг — наименее приоритетны. Специально зашла в регламент и нашла эти слова. Будьте добрее

💘74🍓3💋1

5 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC80 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @k_smuz

Уважаемые, Непрошедшие в конкурс косплееры. Пожалуйста, прекратите вынуждать меня комментировать почему не прошла та или иная заявка. Мы все объяснили в своем посте со списком косплееров. В программе 2 блока по 45 минут, а заявок было более 170, для нас это сверх-много, отклоненных более сотни номеров У нас не заточенное под косплей мероприятие, мы про игры и творчество Отбор соответствует принципам лояльности к н

❤‍🔥7💋42

3 Aug 2026, 23:17 UTC96 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Зазвездился теперь фурри опоссум камера мэн 😐 #sketch #oc

4❤‍🔥2🍾2💋1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @zazvesdilsya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 410,919 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“zazvesdilsya💀 BIG BALLS.” (@zazvesdilsya), 211 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zazvesdilsya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.