Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
46 measurements spanning 81 days, net +28,600. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 46
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 13:37
31,987
+66
6 Nov 2026, 13:05
31,921
+170
5 Nov 2026, 09:59
31,751
+94
4 Nov 2026, 08:38
31,657
+117
3 Nov 2026, 05:19
31,540
+92
2 Nov 2026, 06:41
31,448
+96
1 Nov 2026, 07:18
31,352
+50
31 Oct 2026, 09:35
31,302
+42
30 Oct 2026, 11:09
31,260
+43
29 Oct 2026, 08:41
31,217
+88
28 Oct 2026, 04:58
31,129
+58
27 Oct 2026, 01:38
31,071
+138
25 Oct 2026, 22:17
30,933
+103
25 Oct 2026, 01:46
30,830
+309
23 Oct 2026, 23:05
30,521
+335
22 Oct 2026, 23:39
30,186
+49
21 Oct 2026, 20:29
30,137
+196
20 Oct 2026, 15:29
29,941
+94
19 Oct 2026, 13:58
29,847
+23
18 Oct 2026, 16:10
29,824
first reading
Engagement
83 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
55.6%
avg views ÷ 31,987 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,800
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 83 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
83 (6 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
551,590
Reactions total
19,227
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 22:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
87
Videos
29
Links
65
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
10m 59s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
49,124 reactions across 76 posts, in 55 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
20,786
42.3%
custom 5472391262613053593
10,616
21.6%
custom 5472363757642491575
3,853
7.84%
❤🔥
2,768
5.63%
🔥
2,072
4.22%
custom 5197496704080850774
2,044
4.16%
custom 5471880603886461876
1,327
2.70%
custom 5472345246333444805
1,243
2.53%
💋
751
1.53%
💘
559
1.14%
custom 5474427532377897270
397
0.808%
custom 5471936769173788340
358
0.729%
custom 5472167778284774460
338
0.688%
custom 5474257163910159644
303
0.617%
custom 5472433726954708156
185
0.377%
🤯
179
0.364%
👍
161
0.328%
custom 5474277633724294332
152
0.309%
🍓
149
0.303%
🎉
87
0.177%
35 further kinds
796
1.62%
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 76 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49,124 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
525
across the posts below
Posts paid on
67
of 76 we hold a reading for · 88%
Most on one post
83
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zazer_kalye. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 83 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 32 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Весь мерч в одном месте🎩
Теперь большая часть зазеркального мерча собрана на отдельной странице-витрине: https://zazer-kalye.com/merch/
Там уже доступны новинки — мягкие брелоки:
Толстомясочка 😛
ОНО 🌞
Она 🌚
Морковная пятка 🥕
Кукич 💰
Ассортимент будет пополняться, да и вообще на горизонте маячит череда анонсов по разным темам
Тряхлик найден, зазеркальцы вернулись из СПб, а пользователи Blink, прошедшие квест, проголосовали за то, чтобы оставить портал в Зазеркалье приоткрытым🍄
Кто не успел пройти, не отчаивайтесь — квест можно пройти ещё в течение недели, а персонажи останутся на карте Blink до 22 ноября🙀
Скачать Blink: https://go.blinkmap.com/zzrkl
🍄Долгожданное пополнение принтов по вселенной Зазеркалья!
Плотнейшие футболки, сделанные на 100% хлопке в питерских цехах, с высококачественными принтами по мотивам Зазеркалья, теперь в постоянной продаже! К ним добавили 2 новых дизайна с Птозным Эдгаром, и Сатором Арепычем😠
В комплекте с футболкой идут тематические стикеры и открытка, запаковывается все в ZIP-пакет
Цена комплекта:
💰2 499 ₽ за обычный крой,
💰3 19…
Старожилы помнят, что в канале проводился опрос-выбор героя для новой футболки, в котором победил Птозный Эдгар. Со скоростью Улитолия, но футболки доехали📢
И конечно, новый дизайн с Арепычем и бобылями😠🥚
Мы прошли гига тернистый путь, и всё для того, чтобы сказать, что…
🍄 МЫ ОТКРЫЛИ ИНТЕРНЕТ-МАГАЗИН!!!
Теперь наш мерч можно заказать онлайн!
🛒 Заходите в @RichAvenueBot и нажимайте кнопку «Открыть»!
🥳 Наш праздник — ваш праздник!
Поэтому в честь открытия дарим вам скидку 10% на заказы от 600 рублей!
🎟 Промокод: ILOVEZAZERKALYE
Когда действует акция?
С 5 ноября, 18:00, до 6 ноября, 23:59 (МСК)
Количество примен…
Маня Понич остаётся Маней Понич вне зависимости от окружающей вселенной
Осталось два дня, чтобы пройти квест с Маней и другими зазеркальцами, попавшими в нашу вселенную, в приложении Blink: https://go.blinkmap.com/zzrkl
Обновление игры:
- Можно играть за Пацаноидов🟢🟢
- Новая арена — окраина Сумеречной рощи с некокаемыми Реутенями🥚 и Цупль-Зваками, кокать которых следует медленно
- Мелкие исправления
Играть тут: https://kok.zazer-kalye.com
Парам-пам-пам, в канун Хэллоуина запускаю
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
«Самый странный страшный персонаж квеста»
Что нужно сделать:
1. Придумать своего персонажа хоррор-квеста. Чем страньше и уникальнее – тем лучше.
2. Нарисовать его или сгенерировать изображение с помощью нейросети.
3. Написать небольшую историю: кто он, откуда появился, чем занимается и какие секреты скрывает.
Победителя выберем голосованием среди подписч…
Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @zazer_kalye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@zazer_kalye edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЗАЗЕРКАЛЬЕ” (@zazer_kalye), 31,987 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zazer_kalye.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
