Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +140. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,252–12,445 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 13:39
12,423
+8
15 Sept 2026, 11:18
12,415
+14
13 Sept 2026, 22:20
12,401
+13
12 Sept 2026, 06:00
12,388
+47
10 Sept 2026, 00:41
12,341
-11
6 Sept 2026, 15:41
12,352
-14
4 Sept 2026, 03:57
12,366
+7
1 Sept 2026, 19:34
12,359
-4
31 Aug 2026, 22:27
12,363
-5
31 Aug 2026, 01:36
12,368
-11
29 Aug 2026, 22:04
12,379
-2
29 Aug 2026, 00:43
12,381
-4
28 Aug 2026, 00:57
12,385
+7
27 Aug 2026, 03:43
12,378
-4
26 Aug 2026, 02:24
12,382
+16
24 Aug 2026, 23:12
12,366
+13
23 Aug 2026, 07:28
12,353
+16
21 Aug 2026, 16:22
12,337
+13
20 Aug 2026, 12:17
12,324
+11
19 Aug 2026, 13:28
12,313
first reading
Engagement
119 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 119 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3h 22m
Average length
4m 14s
Measured directly from 48 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
824 reactions across 94 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
706
85.7%
👍
71
8.62%
💯
47
5.70%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 106 of the 119 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 962 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 119 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
تمكنت القوات المسلحة _بفضل الله_ من استهداف تحشيدات وأسلحة تابعة للعدو السعودي وزوارق حربية تابعة لأدواته ومرتزقته في منطقة المخا، وذلك بعدد كبير من الصواريخ البالستية وكانت الإصابة دقيقة بفضل الله وقد أدت العملية إلى تدمير الزوارق والأسلحة، ومصرع وإصابة العشرات من التحشيدات التابعة للعدو السعودي.
مستمرون بعون الله في استهداف أي تحشيدات عسكرية تابعة للعدو السعودي أينما كانت.
http://t.me/army21ye
🎞 (( متحف المستقبل ))
ـhttps://youtu.be/UOhWdcAmUCY
الإعلان الرسمي مهرجان الرسول الأعظم 2026 - 1448هـ
الدورة الثالثة عشرة
🔸 مهرجان الرسول الأعظم
#المولد_النبوي_الشريف
؛•••••••••••••••••••
#زوامل_أنصارالله_القناة_الرسمية
#تنفيذ_إتحاد_الشعراء_والمنشدين
🔰 https://T.me/zawamlAnsarAlllah
🎼 (( متحف المستقبل ))
ـhttps://t.me/maawled/7245
الإعلان الرسمي مهرجان الرسول الأعظم 2026 - 1448هـ
الدورة الثالثة عشرة
🔸 مهرجان الرسول الأعظم
#المولد_النبوي_الشريف
؛•••••••••••••••••••
#زوامل_أنصارالله_القناة_الرسمية
#تنفيذ_إتحاد_الشعراء_والمنشدين
🔰 https://T.me/zawamlAnsarAlllah
Showing the 12 most recent of 119 posts we hold for @zawamlAnsarAlllah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@zawamlAnsarAlllah edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 35 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@zawamlAnsarAlllah named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@militarymediay named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 16 August 2026 · confirmed gone 9 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
💠 قناة حسن الهادي - برنامج رجال الله 💠 @Hassen_Al_hadi · 30,944 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 6 September 2026
زوامل عيسى الليث 2026 @zwamlAllaitth · 23,557 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 18 September 2026
زوامل سالم المسعودي 🎵 @salemalmasody · 93,312 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
زوامل عيسى الليث @zwamlallaith · 258,478 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 August 2026
زوامل عيسى الليث @zoamlAllaith · 24,491 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 16 September 2026
قناة زوامل عيسى الليث الرسمية @zwamlAllaith4 · 157,085 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
عيسى الليث - Issa Allaith @IssaAllaith · 104,244 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
قناة المنشد حسين الطير / زوامل حسين الطير / قناة حسين الطير / حسين الطير @alsoviani · 26,457 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 September 2026
الشاعر ضيف الله سلمان @Dhaifsalman · 24,919 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
زوامل أنصار الله الرسمية @ZawamlAnsarallah · 135,850 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
الشاعر صقر اللاحجي @saqerallahji · 29,873 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 7 September 2026
قناة المسيره الفضائية @almasira1 · 35,125 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 4 September 2026
شاهد - قناة المسيرة مباشر @MubasherWatch · 44,317 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
مؤسسة الإمام الهادي الثقافية @Alhady_co17 · 45,098 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
زوامل عدي السفياني الرسمية @OdayAlsoviani · 74,351 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“زوامل أنصارالله القناة الرسمية” (@zawamlAnsarAlllah), 12,423 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zawamlAnsarAlllah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.