Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ZARINA MAN

@zarinaman

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,582subscribers

-416 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002590693310
TypeChannel
Username@zarinaman
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zarinaman

Growth

14,58214,99814,7907 August 2026 — 14,998 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,998 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,967 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,932 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,891 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,865 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,755 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,693 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,582 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -416. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,520–15,060 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:4514,582-111
12 Aug 2026, 10:3614,693-62
11 Aug 2026, 12:0614,755-110
10 Aug 2026, 08:5014,865-26
9 Aug 2026, 11:5114,891-41
8 Aug 2026, 14:2614,932-35
7 Aug 2026, 16:3114,967-31
7 Aug 2026, 07:3014,998no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:1814,998first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.53%
avg views ÷ 14,582 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held10 (29 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total10,977
Reactions total120
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 01:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

120 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4235.0%
🔥4235.0%
👍1815.0%
💯43.33%
🏆32.50%
🫡32.50%
21.67%
😁21.67%
🤣21.67%
👎10.833%
👏10.833%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC584 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

№1 для офиса, учебы и праздника Откуда мы знаем? Мы просчитали вероятности событий в мужской жизни. Вот что из этого получилось: Трикотажная модель Мягкая и слегка эластичная рубашка. В ней удобно работать за компьютером, тянуть билет на экзамене и вспоминать молодость на свадьбе друга. Лучше всего сочетается с брюками и пиджаком. Модель из хлопка оксфорд Плотная рубашка из 100% хлопка со свободной посадкой. Ее мо

🫡32🔥2👎1

9 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC866 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

На безрыбье... Сегодня в #zarinamanselect — сериалы-новинки, которые сложно назвать обязательными, но и проходить мимо них не стоит. От лучшего по субъективному мнению редактора к просто неплохому. «Мыс страха» 6.6 Ремейк мощного фильма Скорсезе. По сюжету мужчина, отсидевший 17 лет, возвращается с одной целью — испортить жизнь бывшим адвокатам. Если абстрагироваться от оригинала, получается психологический триллер

👍11🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC≈1,000 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Пока у девочек новая ZARINA / ICONIC про сильных женщин, у нас свой «power dressing» Образ рубашка + галстук вышел за пределы офиса и стала одним из главных трендов. В наших моделях: 100% хлопок и галстук идентичный рубашке. Он не перетягивает внимание, а добавляет глубину за счёт многослойности. Так у вас в гардеробе сразу оказывается готовый комплект в офис, на учебу и не только. Кстати, с джинсами работает не

8💯2🔥2😁2

4 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC≈1,160 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

ФИНАЛЬНАЯ РАСПРОДАЖА Цены от 399 ₽ Классная возможность забрать хиты лета и модели, которые понадобятся через месяц со скидками до -75%. Еще и с удобной сортировкой по цене: до 499 до 999 до 1499 до 1999

🔥72

3 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC≈1,330 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Одобрили вам АЛЬФАНЕДЕЛЮ В ZARINA MAN 3-9 августа вернем до -40% кешбэка при оплате картой Альфа банка В розничных магазинах, приложении и на zarina.ru На покупки от 7000 ₽ Максимальный кешбэк 4000 ₽ К покупкам

🔥7🏆3

2 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC≈1,310 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Откроем секрет: редактор не большой фанат футбола. Но во время ЧМ проникся темой и попросил знающих коллег подобрать фильмы для #zarinaman_select, которые будет интересно смотреть не только фанатам. «Пеле: рождение легенды» — 8.5 Даже если вы не страдаете футбольными страстями, вам все равно понравится реальная (~на 70%) история великого футболиста. Фильм наполнен эмоциями, матчи сняты динамично и слоу моушен не раз

9💯2🔥2

1 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC≈1,210 views18 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Мы обновили коллекцию одежды для дома Новогодние пижамы разлетелись очень быстро. А мы получили много запросов на ресток и срочно запустили в работу новые модели Теперь в коллекции комплекты с шортами и брюками в четырех цветах: 100% хлопок, свободный крой, кулиска для регулировки посадки и новые «утренние» принты Совет от редактора, у которого две таких: берите на размер больше. Так комфортнее и легче контролиров

14🤣2👍1👏1

31 Jul 2026, 14:11 UTC≈1,160 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Главный образ недели Главный хит — рубашка в полоску. Плотная, из хлопка с маааленьким процентом льна. Она настолько вам понравилась в прошлом году, что мы повторили модель. Главная фишка — её невозможно сочетать неправильно. С джинсами носим навыпуск. С брюками — заправляем. А еще стилисты предлагают комбинировать её со спортивными брюками из новой коллекции. Получается такая стильная эклектика для самых смелых.

🔥14

29 Jul 2026, 11:25 UTC≈1,370 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Есть вещи, от которых не убежать Дресс-код — одна из них. А если что-то невозможно отменить, это можно адаптировать под себя. В новой коллекции для офиса ZARINA MAN современные решения для любых задач в стенах офиса 📝Получить одобрение руководителя Выбираем пиджак прямого кроя, свободные брюки и рубашку из окфорда. 📝Произвести впечатление на модниц из бухгалтерии Надеваем жилет с футболкой или рубашку с галстуком

9👍3

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @zarinaman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 920,278 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ZARINA MAN” (@zarinaman), 14,582 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zarinaman.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.