Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 56 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 151–166 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Oct 2026, 08:00
164
+1
17 Sept 2026, 15:59
163
+4
9 Sept 2026, 21:59
159
+6
23 Aug 2026, 14:26
153
-2
15 Aug 2026, 18:22
155
-1
8 Aug 2026, 18:17
156
no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:23
156
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
29s
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
24 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5292080619902237999
9
37.5%
😍
6
25.0%
👍
5
20.8%
🤝
3
12.5%
custom 5289576473580049199
1
4.17%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The shares total 264%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Нормативные требования и изменения в законодательстве62%
Другое (напишите в комментариях, можно конкретные вопросы)8%
The shares total 425%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🌿Друзья!
🙌🏼Мы хотим, чтобы наш канал приносил вам максимум пользы. Для этого нам важно узнать, ❗️какие темы вам наиболее интересны и какие материалы помогают в работе❗️
Пожалуйста, ответьте на 3 коротких вопроса — это займет не больше минуты, а ваши ответы помогут сделать канал еще полезнее💎
Сколько человек могут одновременно пользоваться одной станцией?
Всё зависит не только от количества проживающих, но и от объёма водопотребления, количества сантехнических приборов и возможных залповых сбросов.
Именно поэтому станция всегда подбирается индивидуально под конкретный объект, чтобы даже при одновременном использовании душа, туалета, стиральной и посудомоечной машин система работала стабильно и без перег…
Чем Евробион действительно отличается от других станций биологической очистки?
На рынке много станций, которые обещают высокую степень очистки, отсутствие запаха и простое обслуживание. Но главное — не только результат, а за счёт каких технологий он достигается.
Именно здесь начинается главное отличие Евробион.
1. Создан инженером-изобретателем
Автор технологии Евробион — Юрий Олегович Бобылёв, инженер-изобретате…
Почему Национальный Экологический Проект предоставляет гарантию на станции Евробион до 10 лет?
Расширенная гарантия — это не маркетинговый инструмент, а уверенность производителя в собственной продукции.
Она основана на многолетнем опыте разработки, использовании качественных материалов, точных инженерных расчётах и строгом контроле производства.
Если у вас остались вопросы или вы хотите подобрать станцию для свое…
Обзор Евробион РАУНД 5 МИДИ: кому подходит и в чём её преимущества?
Евробион РАУНД 5 МИДИ — станция глубокой биологической очистки IV поколения, рассчитанная на 4–6 пользователей. Оптимальный вариант для загородного дома или дачи, где важны комфорт, надёжность и простое обслуживание.
Производительность станции составляет до 1 000 литров в сутки, а залповый сброс — до 320 литров. Глубина подвода трубы до 90 см позво…
Как переориентировать клиента с дешёвого септика на станцию биологической очистки
Одна из самых распространённых ошибок в продажах — начинать разговор со стоимости.
Когда клиент говорит: «Мне нужен самый недорогой септик», чаще всего он хочет не дешёвое оборудование. Он хочет решить свою задачу с минимальными затратами.
Задача дилера — не спорить с клиентом, а помочь ему посмотреть на покупку шире.
Вместо вопроса…
Ассортимент Национального Экологического Проекта
Инженерные решения для частных домов, коммерческих объектов и промышленности.
Автономные канализации
✔️ Евробион — станции глубокой биологической очистки IV поколения.
✔️ МАКС — доступные станции для стандартных условий.
✔️ ЮБАС — классические станции III поколения.
✔️ Ультра — насосные станции IV поколения.
Очистка воды и инженерные решения
💦 Аэромаг — безреаг…
👍3
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @zaonep. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 264%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Нормативные требования и изменения в законодательстве62%
Другое (напишите в комментариях, можно конкретные вопросы)8%
The shares total 425%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Я - менеджер по продажам/руководитель отдела продаж13%
Я - сервисный инженер7%
Я - технический специалист (проектировщик/выездной инженер/монтажник)13%
Я - маркетолог20%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Евробион НЭП” (@zaonep), 164 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zaonep.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.