Sticker, posted without a caption
Channel
Zani's oppai mole
@zanisOppai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,072subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002236954486 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zanisOppai |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zanisOppai |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 4,072 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 26.8%
- avg views ÷ 4,072 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,090
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 April 2025 – 24 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,090 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 64
- Videos
- 7
- Links
- 10
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 1 month. If they remain inactive for the next 7 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
WW 3.0Beta 【矩阵叠兵】 在矩阵叠兵中,需要完成高难度的关卡挑战。完成关卡将获得积分,累积获得的积分到达一定值时,将能够获得奖励。 【参与条件】 3.0版本更新后,在逆境深塔的深境区中至少一期最高获得印记不少于24个,并且在冥歌海墟的再生海墟-湍流中至少一期累计积分不低于3500 【矩阵】 矩阵叠兵分为【稳态协议】、【奇点扩张】两大区域,完成前一区域所有挑战后,即可开启下一区域的挑战。 【稳态协议】 最多可以上阵三支队伍,击败一个轮次中的所有敌人即可完成挑战。 【奇点扩张】 可以上阵的队伍数量无上限,击败一个轮次中的所有敌人后将开启下一轮次,敌人会随着轮次逐渐变强。 【增幅回路】 在矩阵叠兵中,需要在每支队伍中上阵三位共鸣者,并选择相应的增幅回路后即可开始挑战。 【预养成角色】 需要玩家拥有对应角色后才可以使用的试用角色,试用角色等级为90级,装备90级武器,装备正确的声骸套装,所有声骸25级,共鸣链数量将…
Qiuyuan VS Geshulin SPOILER
https://t.me/MYUYLeaks omg MYUY
new chat t.me/Zanischat
The number of Phrolova's two notes determines whether she is happy or sad #anonymous
😁
Phrolova's dodging action has a special animation #anonymous
(STC)After certain specific operations, Phrolova's resonance liberation will be slightly different. She doesn't have a second resonance liberation #anonymous
There will be an event associated with the overflowing palette in 2.5 #anonymous
we'll have new map in 2.5 #anonymous
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zanisOppai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
我們和Team Gemberry78,Zani’s oppai mole有意創建一個discord server,用於頻道訂閱者之間的交流以及一定程度上的發布訊息,如果你對此有興趣,可以在底下的投票按下yes,讓我們知道你的參加意願
- Yes88%
- No12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2025 to 24 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@infowebinarpendidikan · 43,625
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zani's oppai mole” (@zanisOppai), 4,072 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zanisOppai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.