Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,062–18,368 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 11:15
18,312
-4
15 Sept 2026, 08:17
18,316
-3
13 Sept 2026, 18:57
18,319
-7
12 Sept 2026, 01:54
18,326
+28
9 Sept 2026, 20:18
18,298
+53
6 Sept 2026, 14:15
18,245
+74
4 Sept 2026, 02:57
18,171
+17
2 Sept 2026, 19:38
18,154
+13
1 Sept 2026, 16:12
18,141
+3
31 Aug 2026, 13:16
18,138
+21
30 Aug 2026, 16:16
18,117
+11
29 Aug 2026, 13:35
18,106
+9
28 Aug 2026, 15:33
18,097
-3
27 Aug 2026, 14:38
18,100
+1
26 Aug 2026, 14:43
18,099
-7
25 Aug 2026, 14:08
18,106
-37
24 Aug 2026, 15:46
18,143
-13
23 Aug 2026, 00:16
18,156
+11
21 Aug 2026, 11:44
18,145
+24
20 Aug 2026, 14:06
18,121
first reading
Engagement
88 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.2%
avg views ÷ 18,312 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,350
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 88 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
88 (5 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
176,400
Reactions total
3,659
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 08:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 05s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,770 reactions across 88 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
3,719
38.1%
👍
3,271
33.5%
❤
2,034
20.8%
👏
480
4.91%
🥰
101
1.03%
👌
66
0.676%
🤩
61
0.624%
🙏
17
0.174%
🤔
16
0.164%
😁
5
0.051%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 88 of the 88 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,770 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
1.14%
1 of 88 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
5,290
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
5,540
over 87 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqxXU8VR
1
20 August 2026
20 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
На данный момент - это самое лучшее место для меня. Я тут отдыхаю и ни о чем не тревожусь. Красивая природа, чистейшее бирюзовое озеро, приятный персонал и кафе, замечательный холл-гостиная в виде купола, где можно посмотреть фильм и выпить горячий травяной чай.
Готова возвращаться в Basic каждую неделю 👍
📍озеро Тосканка 🫶
📣 Разместите рекламу в этом канале — её увидят
Аудитория Telegram остаётся активной, что бы ни говорили. Индекс читаемости это подтверждает: охваты каналов по тематикам держатся, люди продолжают читать.
Реклама в Telegram — это законно: ФАС в 2026 году официально подтвердил, что она разрешена.
👉 Заказать размещение в этом канале можно через Telega.in — с маркировкой и закрывающими документами, за пару минут.
Форм…
С началом осени 🍁
Сегодня я уже не провожаю сына в школу. И это очень необычное ощущение. Не покупали форму. Особой суеты и подготовки к новому учебному году не было. Сегодня нет никакой линейки и не надо никуда спешить.
Теперь мой сын студент. Да, впереди 5 лет учебы. Но это уже совсем другая история - студенческая и его личная.
Никаких школьных чатов, никаких сборов денег. Необычно все мне. И как-то слишком тихо…
Что посмотреть сегодня (вчера я не успела с рекомендацией 😉): «Ключ от всех дверей», 2005 года
Я давно не смотрела ужасы/триллеры, но тут захотелось. К тому же фильм привлек меня с самого начала и удержал внимание (что случается крайне редко).
В этом фильме поначалу кажется все предсказуемо и знакомо, но развязка все же удивляет 👍😄
Не сильно страшно или ужасно, вполне всё прилично и интересно.
Про девушку-сиделку…
Каждый раз я думаю: «ну, все, это точно последний теплый день». Но появляются новые теплые дни в перемешку с дождями.
С последним днём лета 😉☘️Как бы не было жаль, но мы идем дальше без оглядки в осень. И это неизбежно, грустно и радостно одновременно.
☀️Солнечные дни еще будут и еще прибавятся пестрые пейзажи из деревьев и листопада.
P.S. Я решилась на красный, да еще и на мини, как яркая точка 31 августа в после…
Конечно, оверсайз никуда не денется никогда (слишком он удобен и расслаблен). Но дизайнеры все же пытаются выйти на новую петлю времени и разнообразить наш гардероб.
Вот, например многие обратились к slim костюмам: приталенные жакеты и брюки-сигареты. Снова классика из 90-х
Acne Studios, Gucci, Givenchy, Carolina Herrera, Toteme и многие другие бренды показывают похожее направление. Узкие брюки-сигареты, жакеты с …
Красивая и стильная идея с платком. Когда рубашка и платок одного цвета и из одного материала; цвет фисташковый тоже супер 🙌
👍41🔥25❤15👏7🤩3
Showing the 12 most recent of 88 posts we hold for @zametkimoegostilista. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Медитирующий Стилист. Психология 💄🧘🏻♀️” (@zametkimoegostilista), 18,312 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zametkimoegostilista.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.