Posted without readable text
👍13custom 52808595668698496156custom 52851320371271522913
Signed Иван Санников

Channel
@zametki_na_polyah
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,373subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001106272417 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zametki_na_polyah |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 October 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zametki_na_polyah |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 1,373 | +3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 1,370 | +6 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 1,364 | +6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:48 | 1,358 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 1,359 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 1,357 | +5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 1,352 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 1,355 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 1,356 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 1,357 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:20 | 1,358 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:11 | 1,358 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
408 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 216 | 52.9% | |
| 👏 | 83 | 20.3% | |
| custom 5285132037127152291 | 68 | 16.7% | |
| custom 5280859566869849615 | 20 | 4.90% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 2.94% | |
| custom 5287767403290173469 | 5 | 1.23% | |
| custom 5287696227092144900 | 3 | 0.735% | |
| custom 5289561960885525354 | 1 | 0.245% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 408 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zametki_na_polyah. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 May 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
👍13custom 52808595668698496156custom 52851320371271522913
Signed Иван Санников
Доброе утро, подписчики! 🤓 Продолжаю тему про курс по #Вайбкод. Столкнулся с блокировкой аккаунта от Anthropic, а это сильно меняет концепцию курса. Об этом, хитропопости и второй части отпуска в сегодняшней заметке на полях. @zametki_na_polyah
👍5
Signed Иван Санников
🤝 Бизнес Системы 9️⃣ лет 🤩 Вокруг меняется если не всё, то многое. Продукты, подходы, технологии, цены, взгляды. То как было в прошлом году, уже не будет. Будет по другому. Приятно понимать, что начинается 10-ый год, когда я прихожу в любимый офис и каждый день, неизменно, есть задачи которые хочется решать 😌 Пусть так и будет 😎👍 С днем рождения, нас!!!!! 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
👏48custom 528513203712715229111👍9custom 52808595668698496155
Signed Иван Санников
Доброе утро, подписчики 😎 Это видео специально для вас, в видео-хостингах его не будет. 00:00 - про #КультураПродаж 00:52 - снова хочу делиться 💪 01:20 - инструмент для решения бизнесовых задач 01:58 - курс, оффлайн, для моих подписчиков 😎 02:30 - что будет на курсе 06:19 - я найду вас по комментарию "я в теме" 07:14 - финалим Отправьте это видео тому, кто хочет понять как применить ИИ в бизнесовых задачах в Красно…
👍8
Signed Иван Санников
Доброе утро, подписчики! 🤓 «У каждой проблемы в бизнесе есть фамилия». Новый выпуск рубрики «Наболело» — про два вида менеджмента: когда компания ориентирована на процессы и когда ориентирована на людей. Почему "Степаныч", сотрудник, может держать за горло весь бизнес и живет бизнес когда знает фамилию проблемы но закрывает на это глаза. Го в комменты, обсудим 🤓 @zametki_na_polyah 📺 Залил на YouTube 📺 Залил на …
👍12💯7custom 52851320371271522912👏1
Signed Иван Санников
Вернулся из отпуска 😎
👍17custom 52851320371271522918custom 52808595668698496152
Signed Иван Санников
Вышла статья, собранная по моим комментариям. Мой взгляд на "Что делать с продажами" 😎
Signed Иван Санников
У вас в базе 1500 клиентов. Активных — 50. Знакомо? Это не исключение. Это типичная картина оптового B2B-бизнеса. Что происходит: Схема B2B-продаж, в которой менеджер выполняет роль оператора — принимает заказ, проверяет остатки, инициирует отгрузку — работала до тех пор, пока сохранялся устойчивый спрос. Многие поставщики из сегмента малого бизнеса столкнулись с необходимостью искать новых заказчиков, но обнаружил…
custom 52877674032901734694👍1
Signed Иван Санников
Доброе утро, подписчики 😐 Сегодня многие заметили, что "интернет" стал работать не так. Комментирую ситуацию, в том числе про то как это задело нас. 00:00 Стартуем 00:25 Что случилось? 00:43 Как это коснулось 🤝 02:21 Как это коснулось вас Получить Битрикс24 бесплатно 03:43 Финалим. Угадайте где я ) Прекрасной вам недели, подписчики, и больших вам продаж 😎 💬 Залил в MAX @zametki_na_polyah
👍9
Signed Иван Санников
В отпуске 😌 7го июля вернусь 😎👍
👍40custom 52851320371271522917👏2custom 52808595668698496152
Signed Иван Санников
Доброе утро, подписчики! 🤓 Показываю как можно изменять интерфейс Битрикс24 под задачи конкретного бизнеса. 00:00 - Стартуем 00:07 - Меняем интерфейс Битрикс24 00:57 - ИИ помогает 01:26 - Что еще есть показать 03:00 - Финалим 📺 Залил на YouTube 📺 Залил на RuTube 💙 Залил на VK 💬 Залил в МАКС 🫡 Обсудить проект в личке: @sannikov_ivan, в Mакс: +79029400312 @zametki_na_polyah
👍18👏3💯1custom 52851320371271522911
Signed Иван Санников
Доброе утро, подписчики! 🤓 Сегодня про: 00:07 MAX пропал из AppStore 02:01 Мы делаем решения для компании используя вайбкод 03:53 Легендарное видео "Что может профессиональный Битрикс24" 04:30 Думаю о БС: Tech Talks 06:53 Финалим 📺 Залил на YouTube 📺 Залил на RuTube 💙 Залил на VK @zametki_na_polyah
👍13custom 52851320371271522913
Signed Иван Санников
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @zametki_na_polyah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Заметки на полях Санникова Ивана” (@zametki_na_polyah), 1,373 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zametki_na_polyah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.