Лето Как лето проходит, повзрослевшие? 😉 ♥️ - Кайфую по полной 😎 - Норм, но не хватает летних каникул 😭 - Раньше было круче! ✅Насыпать монет админу✅
❤24😭21😎13😢7🔥6🥰1

Channel
@zametki_90_00
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,920subscribers
-40 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002145819443 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zametki_90_00 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zametki_90_00 |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 1,920 | -7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:57 | 1,927 | -7 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 1,934 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:15 | 1,935 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 1,937 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 1,939 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 1,940 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 1,946 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 1,947 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 1,951 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 1,958 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 1,960 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 1,960 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
462 reactions across 10 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 134 | 29.0% | |
| 🔥 | 84 | 18.2% | |
| 👍 | 61 | 13.2% | |
| 😢 | 42 | 9.09% | |
| ❤🔥 | 30 | 6.49% | |
| 😎 | 26 | 5.63% | |
| 😭 | 22 | 4.76% | |
| 💯 | 19 | 4.11% | |
| 👀 | 17 | 3.68% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 2.60% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 1.08% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 1.08% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 0.866% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.216% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 462 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 10 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zametki_90_00. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 June 2026 to 10 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Лето Как лето проходит, повзрослевшие? 😉 ♥️ - Кайфую по полной 😎 - Норм, но не хватает летних каникул 😭 - Раньше было круче! ✅Насыпать монет админу✅
❤24😭21😎13😢7🔥6🥰1
Орехокол Да, верно подметили в комментариях про орехокол. Это он самый. В облике петуха. 😁 Были и другие. Но как по мне железные то понадёжнее деревянных будут. 👆 ✅Насыпать монет админу✅
🔥24👍7👏2❤1
Угадайка Знаете предназначение этого петуха? 😎👇 ✅Насыпать монет админу✅
👀17😁10❤2🤔2
Компьютерные клубы Из видео я понял, что компьютерные клубы медленно умерли. Разве их сейчас нет? 🤔 ✅Насыпать монет админу✅
❤14👍10🤔3
Тишина Приехал на дачу, обратил внимание на заброшенный и заросший участок соседей. Мысленно отмотал на 20 лет назад и в памяти всплыла картина: музыка, смех, пышный стол, банька топится, аккуратные грядки, зелёный газон. А теперь тишина и сорняки по пояс. Нет там больше жизни. А когда-то из-за невысокого забора приветливо раздавалось: "Здорово, сосед!" Теперь только тишина... Задумался и ужаснулся: сколько же так…
😢35❤19👍5🔥4😭1
Жвачки Жвачки наравне с газировкой и шоколадом занимали своё почётное место в троице самых ходовых товаров. Turbo, Boomer, Love is..., Tipi Tip, Donald Duck и ещё 101 разновидность. Вкус они теряли быстро, а вот вкладыши от них оставались надолго. Вкладыши являлись настоящей детской валютой. Ими менялись, на них играли, их собирали. А жвачки - это так, вкусный бонус. 😁 Мы знали толк в экономии: зажёвывали до полн…
❤🔥29🔥13❤3👍3🥰1
Газировка из 90-х Как уже писалось выше, к шоколадным батончикам прилагались газированные напитки. Этакий стандартный набор тинейджера. Что называется - гасить пищеварение, так по полной программе. По канонам юношеского максимализма. Лично меня больше всех радовал Dr.Pepper - самая топовая газировка, как по мне. Одно время пропал с полок, но несколько лет назад восстал из пепла. Попробовал ради ностальгии - приколь…
🔥25❤7🥰3👍2❤🔥1😎1
Шоколад из девяностых А вот к этим "ништякам" мы стремились всегда: и на завтрак, и на обед, и на ужин. Сейчас некоторых из них уже нет, а те, что есть уже не вызывают таких эмоций. А вот по малолетству вывалить карманную мелочь в окошко палатки, ларька или киоска (у всех по-разному называлось) и обзавестись шоколадом с газировкой, было делом обыденным. Мы, как и наше пищеварение тогда ещё были в форме и могли пог…
❤27💯14👍6😁2
Хлебное ассорти Ну а куда без хлеба насущного? С этими исконно русскими деликатесами ни один заморский фастфуд не сравнится. Бессмертная классика, дошедшая до наших дней. А в те времена они занимали своё почётное место на столах наряду с кашами и шоколадными подушечками. Как бы пафосно не звучало: пища богов. 😁 Согласны? ✅Насыпать монет админу✅
❤30🔥9💯5🙏1
Сухие завтраки Но во второй половине 90-х появилась и альтернатива кашам: хлопья, колечки, шоколадные подушечки и т.д. Для родителей было проще: ничего варить не надо, молоком залил и готово. А для нас это было повкуснее каши (ну лично для меня так). Тогда мы ещё не предавали значения таким понятиям, как полезно/вредно. Главное: вкусно. 😋 А если к этому ещё и какао прилагалось, то вообще сказка. ☕ Любили? 👍 - за…
👍28😎12❤7🔥3👏2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @zametki_90_00. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Заметки повзрослевшего / Ностальгия о девяностых - нулевых” (@zametki_90_00), 1,920 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zametki_90_00.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.