Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Закрой Гештальт l Психология

Channel

Закрой Гештальт l Психология

@zakroygeshtalt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,791subscribers

-60 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002145298639
TypeChannel
Username@zakroygeshtalt
CreatedBetween 1 December 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zakroygeshtalt

Growth

7,7917,8517,8217 August 2026 — 7,851 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,850 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,839 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,832 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,831 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,823 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,811 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,807 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,801 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,796 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,791 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 31 days, net -60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,782–7,860 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 18:177,791-5
2 Sept 2026, 16:377,796-5
30 Aug 2026, 13:067,801-6
27 Aug 2026, 04:067,807-4
24 Aug 2026, 10:067,811-12
20 Aug 2026, 14:047,823-8
17 Aug 2026, 12:067,831-1
13 Aug 2026, 17:577,832-7
10 Aug 2026, 17:547,839-11
8 Aug 2026, 00:407,850-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:477,851first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 24 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.17%
avg views ÷ 7,791 subscribers
Avg views / post
403
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.993%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held15 (24 March 202624 August 2026)
Views total403
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

74 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4966.2%
👍1418.9%
🔥1114.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC403 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🛋️ На 12 минут вы — психолог. Клиент уже ждёт в кабинете Что вы спросите первым? На что обратите внимание? Где промолчите, а где решите уточнить? Мы создали «Кабинет» — интерактивный тренажёр психологического приёма, где каждый ваш выбор меняет дальнейший разговор. Перед вами будут реальные ситуации и развилки первой встречи. Здесь нельзя просто нажать «правильный ответ» — придётся наблюдать, выдвигать гипотезы и

4

21 Jul 2026, 17:31 UTC≈1,020 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🧩 Все говорят: «Закрой гештальт». Но никто не объясняет, что именно нужно закрывать Может, именно поэтому одни и те же ситуации снова возвращаются в нашу жизнь. Меняются люди, работа, города, а реакции остаются прежними. Будто какая-то история внутри так и не закончилась. Именно об этом будет наш двухдневный психологический интенсив «Закрой гештальт» с Артемом Перковым 👁️ 🌀 22 июля разберемся, что скрывается за эт

4

22 Jun 2026, 08:18 UTC≈1,460 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Кризис среднего возраста — это правда кризис? Или момент, когда жизнь больше не соглашается быть черновиком? Почему-то к этой теме до сих пор относятся снисходительно. Как будто человек просто «чудит»: внезапно идёт учить испанский, покупает билеты в Стамбул на осень, записывается на бокс, начинает печь хлеб на закваске или всерьёз думает уйти из офиса вышивать бисером на удаленке. Со стороны это выглядит почти сме

10

23 May 2026, 07:52 UTC≈1,650 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Елена Новоселова приветствует вас 🤍 Уже через 10 минут встречаемся на конференции «С тобой всё так». Разберём, откуда берётся стыд за уязвимость, почему так трудно признать свою усталость, растерянность или боль и как жизнь в роли «всегда сильного» приводит к внутреннему одиночеству – даже в отношениях. Поговорим о том, как вернуть контакт с собой, не теряя себя в вечном соответствии этой роли 🤩 Регистрация ещё о

10

23 May 2026, 07:51 UTC≈1,420 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

2

22 May 2026, 10:54 UTC≈1,410 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥4

22 May 2026, 09:21 UTC≈1,380 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🌟 Уже завтра — бесплатная онлайн-конференция Talentsy «С тобой всё так» Если вам знакомо чувство, что нужно ещё немного подтянуться, исправиться, соответствовать — чужим ожиданиям, возрасту, соцсетям, чужой версии «правильной жизни», — эта конференция для вас. 23 мая разберём темы, с которыми многие живут годами: 🔜 Елена Новосёлова Мужчина: цена силы, контроля и вечного соответствия О том, как жизнь в роли «всегд

🔥3

21 May 2026, 12:02 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 28 August 2026
Poll

«Успешный успех» в соцсетях: что вы чувствуете?

  1. Бесит27%
  2. Расстраивает15%
  3. Отношусь нейтрально48%
  4. Мотивирует6%
  5. Восхищает4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 May 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,140 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Почему после соцсетей хочется срочно исправить себя? 🥶 Стать красивее, успешнее, собраннее. Как будто с вами что-то не так. Но лента почти никогда не показывает: ✅ тревогу за кадром ✅ усталость ✅ потерянность ✅ страх не справиться ✅ дни, когда человек просто лежит и пытается выдохнуть Вы сравниваете свою живую жизнь с чужой витриной. И от этого правда легко почувствовать себя «недостаточным». Но это не делает ва

1

23 Apr 2026, 11:07 UTC≈1,620 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🧩 Увидимся на вебинаре: https://link.talentsy.ru/mUNqPDKPqA

5

23 Apr 2026, 11:06 UTC≈1,500 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

9

20 Apr 2026, 15:45 UTC≈1,740 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

К жизни инструкцию не приложили. Приходится разбираться на ходу 🥶 К любой технике есть инструкция. К лекарствам и витаминам тоже. А к жизни инструкции нет. Поэтому мы часто идём наугад: пытаемся понять, туда ли движемся, почему не становится легче, как отличить своё от навязанного. 22 и 23 апреля в 19:00 мы проведем бесплатный интенсив «Психология как инструкция к жизни». ✅Вы узнаете: • почему можно делать всё «

👍7🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @zakroygeshtalt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 May 2026, 12:02 UTCAnonymous Poll89 voters

«Успешный успех» в соцсетях: что вы чувствуете?

  1. Бесит27%
  2. Расстраивает15%
  3. Отношусь нейтрально48%
  4. Мотивирует6%
  5. Восхищает4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 24 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Доктор Курпатов
@kurpatov_chtodelat · 33,305
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Закрой Гештальт l Психология” (@zakroygeshtalt), 7,791 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zakroygeshtalt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.