Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Захарыч Блаженный

@zaharRusWorld

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,578subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001505044655
TypeChannel
Username@zaharRusWorld
Created18 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zaharRusWorld

Growth

4,5784,5854,581.56 August 2026 — 4,585 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,585 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,584 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,578 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,577–4,586 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:574,578-6
10 Aug 2026, 04:204,584-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:224,585no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:014,585first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 26 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
29s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,800 reactions across 13 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍80544.7%
65236.2%
🔥20811.6%
❤‍🔥140.778%
👌140.778%
🥰130.722%
🤔120.667%
😁110.611%
👏90.5%
🙏80.444%
🤡80.444%
😢70.389%
😴60.333%
👀50.278%
😎50.278%
🎅40.222%
😍40.222%
🤷40.222%
🍾30.167%
💘30.167%
3 further kinds50.278%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,800reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2025 to 16 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jun 2026, 19:15 UTC≈1,440 views79 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍51🔥10👏94🤡3🎅1😈1

16 Jun 2026, 19:15 UTC≈1,410 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026

добрый оттенок 90ых, нормальная песня

👍504🎅1🤡1

16 Jun 2026, 19:10 UTC≈1,390 views66 reactionsread 12 August 2026

чтобы наши души бились в унисон

55👍10🤡1

16 Jun 2026, 19:01 UTC≈1,440 views89 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

56👍15🔥11💘3🤡2🥰2

16 Jun 2026, 18:22 UTC≈1,450 views164 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

мой новый кореш) Подмосковье: где-то чëрный дым, а где-то белые лебеди

👍9261😢3🎅2🎉2😁2❤‍🔥1🤔1

16 Jun 2026, 18:17 UTC≈1,370 views216 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

всем привет. на этом канале есть живые души? выкладываю я здесь не часто, но, зато, самое сокровенное

👍14758🥰11

4 Nov 2025, 07:37 UTC≈6,870 views138 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

73👍27🔥23😴6👀5😎3🤡1

4 Nov 2025, 07:35 UTC≈6,730 views158 reactionsread 12 August 2026

друзья, хорошего (по слабой возможности) дня

109👍42🤷4🙏2🍾1

4 Nov 2025, 07:34 UTC≈6,980 views218 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Во всяком случае нам следует ежеминутно благодарить бога, благодарить его радостно, весело. Не быть радостным, не ликовать духом — даже грех. Поэтому и ты не грусти, ничем не смущайся, не пребывай в тоске, но веселись беспрестанно, в беспрестанном выражении благодарности и признательности, вся наша жизнь должна быть неумолкаемой, радостной песнью благодаренья богу. Из письма Николая Гоголя сестре Ольге 22 декабря 18

139👍62🤔11🙏6

26 Oct 2025, 15:39 UTC≈7,230 views207 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🔥11253👍19❤‍🔥13😍4😢4🕊2

26 Oct 2025, 15:39 UTC≈6,900 views111 reactionsread 12 August 2026

на вечер предлагаю нам такую песнь

👍87🔥231

26 Oct 2025, 15:15 UTC≈6,720 views170 reactionsread 12 August 2026

как вы? надеюсь, нормально

👍116🔥2114👌14😁5

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @zaharRusWorld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,087,156 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Захарыч Блаженный” (@zaharRusWorld), 4,578 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zaharRusWorld.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.