Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KIMY

Channel

KIMY

@zaebachoplayboy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,561subscribers

-127 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001355041370
TypeChannel
Username@zaebachoplayboy
Created27 November 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zaebachoplayboy

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,5529,6889,6206 August 2026 — 9,688 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,688 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,661 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,651 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,622 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,578 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,552 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,584 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,578 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,575 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,564 subscribers8 September 2026 — 9,576 subscribers12 September 2026 — 9,558 subscribers16 September 2026 — 9,561 subscribers9,5616 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net -127. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,532–9,708 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 08:389,561+3
12 Sept 2026, 15:369,558-18
8 Sept 2026, 16:409,576+12
3 Sept 2026, 20:199,564-11
31 Aug 2026, 21:569,575-3
29 Aug 2026, 05:239,578-6
25 Aug 2026, 23:489,584+32
22 Aug 2026, 23:179,552-26
19 Aug 2026, 14:349,578-44
16 Aug 2026, 04:149,622-29
12 Aug 2026, 20:179,651-10
9 Aug 2026, 17:519,661-27
6 Aug 2026, 10:169,688no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:429,688first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 03s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,689 reactions across 23 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,10257.0%
💯90124.4%
custom 618618970594450054668618.6%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,689 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
65
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 23 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zaebachoplayboy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 June 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC≈1,260 views115 reactions5 Starsread 29 August 2026

Человек паук : новый день - лучшая часть из всех 💯 взрослый Питер со взрослыми проблемами - 10/10 раскрытие персонажа -10/10 съемка и эффекты 10/10

❤71💯24custom 618618970594450054620

26 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈2,260 views271 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Я знаю кто , я знаю как - дает мне деньги просто так 🩷

❤159💯68custom 618618970594450054644

24 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC≈3,150 views156 reactions5 Starsread 29 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

custom 618618970594450054674❤45💯37

24 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC≈3,150 views87 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Простите , 30 перелетов в дубай с 21 года )))

❤82custom 61861897059445005463💯2

24 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC≈3,170 views141 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Пиздел на Бойку , глаза режет что ее «хуйня» по твоему мнению 15 лямов только на яндексе набирает и вышла в мировой тренд Теперь Дорочку трогаешь Что за вывоз на женщинах ? Слабо на мужиков так же кидаться ?

❤129💯9custom 61861897059445005463

24 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC≈3,180 views155 reactionsread 29 August 2026

панч про самую не конфликтную девушку в индустрии , ебать по мужски

❤144custom 61861897059445005466💯5

24 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC≈3,190 views158 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Лол , а Катюша твоя не шкура ? Любительница формулы 1 Азербайджан и 18 поездок в дубай ?

💯103custom 618618970594450054629❤26

24 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC≈3,170 views37 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

🤬 Кизару задиссил Дору в новом сниппете — этот трек войдёт в альбом, который выйдет 11 сентября Эта Дора бля внатуре дура, очередная шкура Мнение?

❤37

21 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC≈3,640 views31 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Богини , снимаем свой марафет 💋

❤21💯5custom 61861897059445005465

21 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC≈3,720 views45 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Звук ЕЕ РЕПЕР БЫЛ СО МНОЙ И ЭТО ЕЕ КАМПЛЕКС 😈 Звук КУЧИ ГУЧИ ПУСИ ТРОПИКАНА 💦🥥

❤40custom 61861897059445005463💯2

21 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC≈3,740 views202 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤110custom 618618970594450054655💯37

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @zaebachoplayboy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Карина головного мозга
@karinachi14 · 28,603
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 9 September 2026
chikulya
@chikylyaaa · 63,767
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 21 August 2026
millkovv
@millkovvloveu · 43,151
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 28 August 2026
БЕЙБИ ТЕРИ ЗА КАДРОМ
@babietery · 28,528
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 9 September 2026
Мария Норик |Сделай себя сам
@ebashingmama · 30,082
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 8 September 2026
Богатый Папик
@Denis_Baiguzhin · 22,036
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KIMY” (@zaebachoplayboy), 9,561 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zaebachoplayboy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.