Channel
@zabolotnev
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12,827subscribers
-33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001370285879 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zabolotnev |
| Description | Не последний человек в телеграме, скуф, модель AD: [email protected] | @petrovaae |
| Created | 13 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zabolotnev |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 12,827 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 12,832 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 12,835 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 12,836 | -9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 12,845 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:51 | 12,848 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 12,850 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 12,854 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 12,858 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 12,860 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 12,860 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 19 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,462 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,823 | 52.7% | |
| 🤣 | 970 | 28.0% | |
| custom 5328162399637747185 | 195 | 5.63% | |
| custom 5341324472945236384 | 152 | 4.39% | |
| custom 5449735297241723865 | 137 | 3.96% | |
| 🍓 | 107 | 3.09% | |
| 🌭 | 40 | 1.16% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 1.10% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,462reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zabolotnev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 April 2026 to 11 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Давненько не было разоблачений вселенной ✨ Сегодня снова сенсационные факты и лайфхаки, которые почему-то скрывали от нас всё это время 😳 только не говорите, что у вас контейнер для 8 яиц 😬 канал заболотнева 🧠
🤣89🔥38❤20🌭7custom 53281623996377471852
кино. 22.05
❤286custom 544973529724172386527🍓16custom 532816239963774718511
завтра свадьба, переживаю немного)
❤260🍓31custom 544973529724172386528custom 53281623996377471856
дегустация свадебного торта 😂🍅🥓 отдать голос каналу 😮💨
❤116🤣51custom 532816239963774718510
этот день был слишком красивым 🧡✨ фотограф: @maria_zhandarova кольца: @lavivion стиль: @alexandra_stylist_moscow костюм: @midda платье: @regina_stazharova визажист: @ekaterina_sazhina_muah
❤249🍓27custom 532816239963774718511custom 544973529724172386510🌭2
Узаконили стрелы 💘✍️
❤274🤣106🍓20custom 544973529724172386511custom 53281623996377471857🌭1
Расписались! Фото с супругой!) ❤️
❤434custom 5341324472945236384152custom 544973529724172386537🍓8custom 53281623996377471858🌭5
Примерка на ЗАГС 😂
🤣216❤16🌭11custom 54497352972417238658custom 53281623996377471854
организаторы скинули итоговую свадебную смету:
🤣259custom 532816239963774718571custom 54497352972417238654🌭2
Кате не говорите, пожалуйста 😂
🤣192custom 532816239963774718545❤17
Начинается свадебный сериал 😍 а скоро ещё примерки, хореография, дегустации и тп, мне это надо было? 😂
❤151🤣57custom 532816239963774718520🌭12custom 544973529724172386512🍓5
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @zabolotnev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“zabolotnev” (@zabolotnev), 12,827 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zabolotnev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.