Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Выиграй TG-PREMIUM

@zaberipremium

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,630subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002108227198
TypeChannel
Username@zaberipremium
DescriptionЛучшие розыгрыши подписок на TELEGRAM PREMIUM 🫂Реклама / Сотрудничество @petuheh *отвечаем быстро, вкусные цены
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zaberipremium

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ON_PREMIUM/36524 Oct 2025, 16:54 UTC@zaberipremium/70 · this entry24 Oct 2025, 16:54 UTC1.00under a minute
@zaberipremium/71 · this entry28 Oct 2025, 19:43 UTC@ON_PREMIUM/36628 Oct 2025, 19:43 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ON_PREMIUM7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@ON_PREMIUM (61)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 11 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 March 2025 to 11 January 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @ON_PREMIUM. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6,6306,6426,6367 August 2026 — 6,642 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,642 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,630 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,628–6,644 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 22:576,630-12
7 Aug 2026, 15:306,642no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:206,642first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
5
Videos
1
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

803 reactions across 16 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🏆24730.8%
🔥8510.6%
🖕8210.2%
😢728.97%
587.22%
👍536.60%
👎435.35%
😭313.86%
💯263.24%
🤣192.37%
🕊151.87%
🗿141.74%
🥰91.12%
👏60.747%
🍓50.623%
😁50.623%
🐳40.498%
💘40.498%
30.374%
🌭30.374%
11 further kinds192.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 803reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2025 to 11 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Jan 2026, 12:14 UTC76 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ilyasitnovPhoto

🚀 Добавлен новый продукт в "PLR Библиотеку Готового Контента"! Решил дать то, что актуально в 2026 году - "Как вести блог, если не хочешь быть блогером" Блог - самый быстрый социальный лифт, который даёт и деньги, и связи, и возможности. Но есть много людей, которые не хотят плясать перед камерой, и для них есть классное рабочее решение. 👇Участники "Библиотеки" продукт уже забирают БЕСПЛАТНО, а кто еще не там - 1

28 Oct 2025, 19:43 UTC169 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎂 Tribute отмечает 2 года Илья Ситнов среди номинантов на Автора года в категории Финансы. Ваш голос решает — поддержите и помогите победить💪💖

24 Oct 2025, 16:54 UTC177 viewsread 12 August 2026

Рееееебяяят Пожалуйстааааа ))) Нужна помощь) Максимальный РЕПОСТ плиз) https://t.me/ilyasitnov/1434 🚀 Мы с вами сможем занять 1 место, чтобы провести большой розыгрыш призов? ⚡️Меня номинировали на "Автора года" в категории "Финансы" в сервисе Tribute! И пока что я на 2 месте... Но верю, что до 1 места с вашей поддержкой доберемся - и тогда я устрою масштабный розыгрыш призов, которого еще у нас не было! 👇Всё п

7 Sept 2025, 11:17 UTC187 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ilyasitnov

🚀 Остался 1 час до эфира! Уже в 15.00 МСК стартует прямой эфир "45 пазлов успеха" 👇 Трансляция пройдет по этой ссылке, заходите уже сейчас и успейте занять место: https://propiar.goodly.pro/gw/room/45pazlov Важно смотреть эфир С КОМПЬЮТЕРА, чтобы забрать все подарки (в том числе денежные), и не пропустить важную информацию!

🔥2👍1👏1

19 Jun 2025, 08:18 UTC358 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ilyasitnovPhoto

Наш клуб "БЧБ" получит инструкции накопления биткойна) ВСТУПИТЬ в ЗАКРЫТЫЙ клуб: https://t.me/b4b_club_bot Если будет много коментариев и АКТИВНОСТИ я проведу встречу раньше чем выйдет курс и вебинар по этому инструменту... Очень классная копилка (BTC) БИТКОЙНА) за этот месяц накопил: 0.09297349 BTC и это за 15 дней... Не приглашая! Тут этого не нужно! Считаю, что такой инструмент должен быть у каждого! СПИМ - А

🔥3👍1👏1🗿1

24 Apr 2025, 15:25 UTC551 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ilyasitnovPhoto

Получить полную настройку КАК РАБОТАТЬ с партнерскими программами. Получаем по этой ссылке ==============>>>

🔥32👍2👏1

20 Apr 2025, 14:49 UTC683 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ilyasitnov

Христос воскрес! Друзья, от души поздравляю вас со Светлой Пасхой! Пусть в этот день станет чуть больше тепла, света и веры — в себя, в близких, в добро, в то, что всё обязательно получится. Пусть ваши дома наполнятся любовью и радостью. А впереди — будет только лучше. Подчеркну САМОЕ ЛУЧШЕЕ) Спасибо каждому из вас за то, что мы здесь вместе. За движение, за поддержку, за живой диалог. Вы — невероятные. И всё, чт

👍52🔥1

19 Apr 2025, 03:30 UTC621 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ilyasitnov

🧠 КАК ЗАРАБОТАТЬ НА ПАРТНЕРКАХ В 2025 ГОДУ Уфф, тема животрепещущая и актуальная для всех, кому в интернете нужно не просто на котиков смотреть, а зарабатывать деньги. 👀 Партнерки, честно скажу - идеальный заработок, потому что: - не нужно создавать продукт - не нужно общаться с клиентами - тратишь времени, сколько хочешь (хоть 30 минут в день) - и работаешь в своё удовольствие 😳 Читаешь это и глаза загораются, но

👍2🔥21

14 Apr 2025, 10:05 UTC≈3,380 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

😢23🤣8🦄3👨‍💻1🗿1

12 Apr 2025, 10:40 UTC≈3,940 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ураааа раздача для всех в 15:00 МСК Сегодня в 15.00 МСК - Космическая Раздача новых продуктов! Будет массовая раздача лучших продуктов на темы онлайн-заработка - такое точно нельзя пропустить! 👇 Старт - сегодня в 15.00 МСК по ссылке: https://propiar.goodly.pro/gw/room/eventdiscount Заходите на эфир заранее и лучше с компьютера! Пересылайте ссылку друзьям кому нужен заработок в онлайн)))

🐳4👍4🔥3

9 Apr 2025, 14:25 UTC≈3,630 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ilyasitnov

Что делать, если не идёт: 5 нетипичных способов раскачать бизнес 🌀📈 Иногда кажется, что бизнес — это старый велосипед: крутишь-крутишь, а он всё на месте. Клиенты вялые, охваты спят, выручка зевает. Но чаще всего проблема — не в «сезоне» и не в вас. Просто нужно встряхнуться. Вот 5 нестандартных способов раскачать бизнес, когда всё застопорилось 👇 🔁 1. Поменяйте аудиторию, а не продукт Иногда продукт отличный, но

3🏆3💘3👍1🤔1

7 Apr 2025, 19:09 UTC≈3,560 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ilyasitnov

Главный совет для начинающего инфобизнесмена 🚀👶 Когда вы только заходите в инфобизнес, кажется, что нужно разбираться во всем: – в упаковке продукта, – в маркетинге, – в таргетинге, – в автоворонках, – в танцах с бубнами над имейл-рассылкой. Но правда в том, что главное — не это. Главный совет звучит так: 👉 Начните продавать, пока ещё не всё готово. Сайт — не идеален? Продукт — сырой? Профиль — не оформлен на 100

👍5🔥53🏆2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zaberipremium. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Apr 2025, 12:26 UTCAnonymous Poll1,100 voters approx.

Разыграли сегодня кого-нибудь

  1. Да 👏63%
  2. Нет25%
  3. У меня побуквенная тарификация, не буду отвечать)))11%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2025 to 11 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Выиграй TG-PREMIUM” (@zaberipremium), 6,630 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zaberipremium.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.