Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
44 measurements spanning 90 days, net +13,147. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 44
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 10:07
13,189
-6
4 Nov 2026, 07:39
13,195
-8
3 Nov 2026, 10:05
13,203
-1
2 Nov 2026, 09:48
13,204
-11
1 Nov 2026, 12:55
13,215
-12
31 Oct 2026, 14:35
13,227
-39
30 Oct 2026, 13:41
13,266
-39
29 Oct 2026, 12:15
13,305
-24
28 Oct 2026, 10:17
13,329
-24
27 Oct 2026, 08:56
13,353
-39
26 Oct 2026, 05:47
13,392
-33
25 Oct 2026, 04:07
13,425
-24
24 Oct 2026, 02:31
13,449
-50
23 Oct 2026, 01:39
13,499
-38
21 Oct 2026, 22:36
13,537
-27
20 Oct 2026, 18:37
13,564
-54
19 Oct 2026, 15:36
13,618
-39
18 Oct 2026, 15:28
13,657
-16
17 Oct 2026, 16:57
13,673
-60
16 Oct 2026, 16:55
13,733
first reading
Engagement
56 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.648%
avg views ÷ 13,189 subscribers
Avg views / post
85.5
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
90.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 56 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
56 (24 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
1,368
Reactions total
1,236
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 18:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
68
Links
3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2,678 reactions across 33 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
526
19.6%
🎉
448
16.7%
❤
442
16.5%
🔥
432
16.1%
😁
430
16.1%
🤩
398
14.9%
🤣
2
0.075%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,678 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🇺🇸 PMI DỊCH VỤ MỸ GIẢM TRONG THÁNG 10, ÁP LỰC LẠM PHÁT VẪN DAI DẲNG
Dữ liệu PMI dịch vụ Mỹ công bố ngày 04/11 cho thấy hoạt động kinh tế tiếp tục mở rộng nhưng đang có dấu hiệu chậm lại.
📊 ISM Services PMI:
Thực tế: 54,5
Dự báo: 54,8
Kỳ trước: 54,9
📊 S&P Global Services PMI:
Thực tế: 56,1
Dự báo: 57,9
Kỳ trước: 57,9
Đáng chú ý, ISM Prices Index vẫn ở mức 73, cho thấy áp lực giá đầu vào chưa được kiểm soát hoàn toàn. …
-Theo Reuters, ngành công nghiệp Crypto đã rót tổng cộng 176 triệu USD vào các hoạt động liên quan đến cuộc bầu cử giữa nhiệm kỳ năm 2026 tại Mỹ.
Riêng Fairshake và các tổ chức liên kết đã chi khoảng 154 triệu USD, trong đó có khoảng 56 triệu USD nhằm ngăn cản Sherrod Brown tái đắc cử vào Thượng viện tại bang Ohio. Lý do chính là Sherrod Brown được xem là một trong những chính trị gia có quan điểm cứng rắn với ngành …
🚨 BREAKING: BINANCE ĐỐI MẶT SỰ CỐ AN NINH NGHIÊM TRỌNG, HƠN 5 TỶ USD TÀI SẢN ĐÃ BỊ PHONG TỎA
Sáng 30/10/2026, thị trường crypto chấn động trước thông tin Binance – sàn giao dịch tiền mã hóa lớn nhất thế giới – đang điều tra một sự cố an ninh nghi có liên quan đến hoạt động tấn công ví nóng (Hot Wallet).
Những diễn biến đáng chú ý:
🔹 Binance xác nhận đang điều tra: Đại diện Binance cho biết sàn đã ghi nhận báo cáo về …
📊 FOMC 28/10: FED GIỮ NGUYÊN LÃI SUẤT, THỊ TRƯỜNG CHỜ TÍN HIỆU TIẾP THEO
Ngày 28/10/2026, Cục Dự trữ Liên bang Mỹ (Fed) công bố quyết định lãi suất mới nhất, tiếp tục thu hút sự chú ý của thị trường tài chính và cộng đồng nhà đầu tư crypto.
🔹 1. Những điểm đáng chú ý từ cuộc họp FOMC
▪️ Lãi suất: Fed giữ nguyên lãi suất ở mức 3,75–4%, cho thấy cơ quan này vẫn thận trọng trong việc điều chỉnh chính sách tiền tệ.
▪️ Qu…
CÁC ĐỊNH CHẾ TÀI CHÍNH ĐANG CRYPTO HÓA: CUỘC CHUYỂN DỊCH CỦA HỆ THỐNG TÀI CHÍNH TRUYỀN THỐNG
Crypto không còn chỉ là sân chơi của các sàn giao dịch hay nhà đầu tư cá nhân. Các tổ chức tài chính lớn đang từng bước tích hợp tài sản số vào hệ thống thanh toán, dịch vụ ngân hàng và hạ tầng tài chính toàn cầu.
🔹 1. Mastercard: Đưa quản trị rủi ro vào thanh toán stablecoin
Mastercard ra mắt giải pháp Stablecoin Security, …
OPENAI GẤP RÚT GỌI VỐN 30 TỶ USD TRƯỚC THỀM IPO CỦA ANTHROPIC
Theo Reuters, OpenAI đang đẩy nhanh huy động khoảng 30 tỷ USD, với mục tiêu đưa định giá công ty vượt 1.400 tỷ USD, trước khi đối thủ Anthropic dự kiến IPO vào giữa tháng 11.
💰 OpenAI: Cuộc đua huy động vốn tăng tốc
• Các nhà đầu tư hiện hữu như SoftBank và quỹ MGX của Abu Dhabi được cho là đang thảo luận tham gia vòng gọi vốn.
• OpenAI muốn tận dụng đà tă…
PPI MỸ TĂNG VỌT, ÁP LỰC LẠM PHÁT GIA TĂNG
📊 PPI tháng 9:
• PPI tháng/tháng: +1,3% | Dự báo: 0,6%
• PPI năm/năm: +6,3% | Dự báo: 5,3%
• Core PPI tháng/tháng: +0,7% | Dự báo: 0,3%
⛽ Giá xăng tăng mạnh là một trong những nguyên nhân chính khiến PPI vượt xa kỳ vọng.
⚠️ Tác động thị trường: Dữ liệu làm gia tăng lo ngại Fed sẽ duy trì lãi suất cao lâu hơn, gây áp lực lên chứng khoán Mỹ và thị trường Crypto.
👀 Cần theo …
🔥 CPI Mỹ cao hơn dự kiến - Áp lực lên Crypto
📊 CPI: 3,7% | Dự báo: 3,6% | Kỳ trước: 3,4%
📊 Core CPI: 2,6% | Dự báo: 2,5% | Kỳ trước: 2,4%
⚠️ Tác động thị trường:
• Fed: Khó cắt giảm lãi suất, nguy cơ duy trì chính sách thắt chặt lâu hơn.
• Chứng khoán: Gây áp lực lên nhóm cổ phiếu tăng trưởng/công nghệ.
• Crypto: BTC và altcoin có thể chịu áp lực bán khi khẩu vị rủi ro suy giảm.
• USD và vàng: USD có thể tăng, và…
🎉18😁15🔥12🤩12❤10👍8
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @zBitVietnam00. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“zBit Việt Nam” (@zBitVietnam00), 13,189 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zBitVietnam00.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.