Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 佛山南海区🌸依一、开课中

Channel

佛山南海区🌸依一、开课中

@yyyyyiyi123

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,874subscribers

+67 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003754567576
TypeChannel
Username@yyyyyiyi123
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yyyyyiyi123

Growth

1,8071,8741,840.512 August 2026 — 1,807 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,860 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,874 subscribers12 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +67. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,797–1,884 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 13:461,874+14
12 Aug 2026, 13:451,860+53
12 Aug 2026, 03:451,807first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.8%
avg views ÷ 1,874 subscribers
Avg views / post
915
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.109%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held13 (23 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total10,976
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC164 viewsread 12 August 2026

哥哥们, 今天🈵啦,明天1点开,头课还在,🉑预约留位哦,@yyyiyi111

11 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC268 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

👀👀👀今天回来开课了,宝贝们, 5点后面,都还有位置的, 🉑预约留位哦,滴滴滴,@yyyiyi111

7 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC620 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

世界太大,我先去看看,#巴厘岛

1

28 Jul 2026, 05:34 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 12 August 2026

🌸🌸🌸‼️哥哥们,📢📢,休息几天,开在通知,等依一回来哦, 回来会提前一天说哦,@yyyiyi111

26 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC≈1,430 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌸🌸🌸宝贝们,开课啦,@yyyiyi111

1

25 Jul 2026, 11:47 UTC≈1,420 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @FSsvyjbgj

【少御报告】https://t.me/FSsnyjhj 【老师艺名】 依一 【联系方式】 @yyyiyi111 【所在位置】 禅城 【验证留名】 禤炜 【验证时间】 7/25 【修车费用】 p 【颜值身材】 8.5 人照7~8成,身材没得说 【服务内容】 xcz + 69(69我没做😁) 【服务态度】 9 (态度挺好没不耐烦) 【优点缺点】 优点: 1️⃣ 硬件还可以(广东妹子,人照7~8成,黄皮,很滑(🐻是白的)微微胖,🐻是d+或者e 一个手抓不住,柔软,中垂,身高165+ ) 2️⃣ 情绪价值还可以(早到进门还会先聊聊天,还有水果和水喝,床上反馈自然,还有jk战衣选。) 3️⃣ 蜜穴无异味,处理过毛毛不多,内粉。紧致度中上 (老师喜欢后入,后入大屁股可以,传教可以感觉到子宫收缩) 缺点: 1️⃣ 无🐍 (我的问题口臭了😢) 2️⃣ 微微胖 (小肚子不多,胸都这么大了很正常了😂) 3️⃣ 符文战士 (左右

2

25 Jul 2026, 04:01 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @FSsvyjbgj

【少御报告】https://t.me/FSsvyjhj 【老师艺名】依一 【联系方式】@yyyiyi111 【所在位置】禅城 【验证留名】小李 【验证时间】7.24 【修车费用】800 【颜值身材】前凸后翘 【服务内容】课表 【服务态度】好 【优点缺点】没有 【推荐程度】9 【体验细节】 见到老师胸真的好大 果断缴费 洗澡 躺平享受🐍了一会 开始口活 舔的舒服要死 两分钟过后 女生开始摇 两个大车灯晃一晃的简直不要太爽 受不了传教士吸一下老师的大奶子 五十秒输出交代 洗澡回家 下次继续反 ♥️温馨提示: 以上仅代表个人体验,报告仅供参考! 报告提交: @QST_mrlbot

24 Jul 2026, 16:47 UTC≈1,000 viewsread 12 August 2026

🌸🌸🌸今天的课程,就到这啦, 明天见哦,哥哥们,@yyyiyi111

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @yyyyyiyi123. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,043,620 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“佛山南海区🌸依一、开课中” (@yyyyyiyi123), 1,874 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yyyyyiyi123.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.