🎀🎀🎀🎀
custom 542489289286907217719custom 537736723290289710117custom 524267941643738197916

Channel
@yuzzme1erh0ld
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
81subscribers
+73 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003898969121 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yuzzme1erh0ld |
| Created | 3 April 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yuzzme1erh0ld |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 81 | +70 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 11 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 11 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 8 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 3 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (3 April 2026 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 3,880 |
| Reactions total | 1,044 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,044 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5377490897896252059 | 200 | 19.2% | |
| custom 5242679416437381979 | 178 | 17.0% | |
| custom 5424892892869072177 | 178 | 17.0% | |
| custom 5377367232902897101 | 175 | 16.8% | |
| custom 5377828804448264182 | 166 | 15.9% | |
| custom 5375445780498785071 | 147 | 14.1% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,044reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yuzzme1erh0ld. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 April 2026 to 25 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎀🎀🎀🎀
custom 542489289286907217719custom 537736723290289710117custom 524267941643738197916
ᅠᅠ🤩𝐮𝐳𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐞𝐞 𝐢𝐫𝐥 𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 ?? 👍
Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.
custom 537782880444826418238custom 524267941643738197932custom 537544578049878507129custom 537749089789625205921custom 537736723290289710120custom 542489289286907217720
🎀🎀🎀🎀
custom 524267941643738197910custom 53774908978962520599custom 53778288044482641829
🤩🤩🤩
custom 537749089789625205915
ᅠ😀😀🤩💌ꪮ𝐮ִ𝐫 ꪮթᎥᩧ꯭︪𝐧𝐢𝐨ꫝ 𝐚𝟏⃘ ꪮ𝐮𝐭 ო𝐞.🤩😀
custom 537544578049878507136custom 537736723290289710129custom 537749089789625205926custom 537782880444826418223custom 542489289286907217721custom 524267941643738197919
🎀🎀🎀🎀
custom 542489289286907217710custom 53774908978962520598custom 53773672329028971017
File, posted without a caption
custom 537782880444826418232custom 537736723290289710124custom 537749089789625205920custom 542489289286907217718custom 537544578049878507116custom 524267941643738197915
🎀🎀🎀🎀
custom 52426794164373819799custom 53774908978962520598custom 54248928928690721778custom 53773672329028971014
ᅠᅠ🤩🤩🤩 ℳe n my bf btw !! 🪦 🤩🤩 🤩'𝐯𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐚 𝐰𝐚𝐥𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐦𝐚𝐧🥹 ᅠᅠ ⸼ ᷼⏜ְ 🥹 ... 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐚 𝐥𝐨𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞. 🌟🌟 🤩𝐨𝐮 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐤𝐞𝐩𝐭 𝐦𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞. 😇
custom 542489289286907217734custom 537749089789625205926custom 524267941643738197924custom 537782880444826418223custom 537544578049878507120custom 537736723290289710120
🎀🎀🎀🎀
custom 53773672329028971019custom 53778288044482641828custom 52426794164373819797custom 53774908978962520594
Posted without readable text
custom 542489289286907217726custom 537749089789625205922custom 537736723290289710120custom 524267941643738197915custom 537544578049878507115custom 537782880444826418215
🎀🎀🎀🎀
custom 53773672329028971019custom 53774908978962520598custom 52426794164373819797custom 54248928928690721775
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @yuzzme1erh0ld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ᅠᅠ🤩𝐮𝐳𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐞𝐞 𝐢𝐫𝐥 𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 ?? 👍
Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 25 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,191,849 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᅠb1o. ^_^” (@yuzzme1erh0ld), 81 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yuzzme1erh0ld.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.