频道赞助广告商: 😑🫤😐🫥😶🤥🫠🤫🫡🫢⚡️ 人民币注册 ⚡️ USDT注册😑注册就送28.8U 🚒🚐🛻🚚🚛🚜🦯 🟢人名币注册 🟢USDT注册😀注册就送28.8U ⚡️0.1TRX能量租赁 @RR321bot
👍1

Channel
@yuyinku
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,176subscribers
+568 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002014922229 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yuyinku |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yuyinku |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 10,176 | -192 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 10,368 | -161 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 10,529 | -177 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 10,706 | -32 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 10,738 | -137 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 10,875 | -147 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 11,022 | -159 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 11,181 | +1,959 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 9,222 | -94 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 9,316 | -53 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 9,369 | -98 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 9,467 | -130 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 9,597 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 9,608 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 9,608 | first reading |
72 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 52 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 72 (15 July 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 31,074 |
| Reactions total | 49 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
129 reactions across 36 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 45 | 34.9% | |
| ❤ | 42 | 32.6% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 9.30% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 6.20% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 5.43% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 3.10% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 3.10% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 3.10% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 2.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 72 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
频道赞助广告商: 😑🫤😐🫥😶🤥🫠🤫🫡🫢⚡️ 人民币注册 ⚡️ USDT注册😑注册就送28.8U 🚒🚐🛻🚚🚛🚜🦯 🟢人名币注册 🟢USDT注册😀注册就送28.8U ⚡️0.1TRX能量租赁 @RR321bot
👍1
🚒🚐🛻🚚🚛🚜🦯 🩷❤️🧡💛💚🩵💙💜🖤🩶 全新游戏体验来袭,炫酷画面,丰富玩法一次开启! ⚡️ 多种热门游戏任你选择 😝 精彩活动持续上线 ⚡️ 幸运时刻,等你来挑战! 😀现在就进入M.GAME开启属于你的精彩时刻! 😀M.GAME|欢乐不停,惊喜不断! 🤣🥲☺️😃😄😁😊😊😇 🥹😅😂🙂🙃😉😌😍🥰 😀关注官方频道参与更多优惠活动! 😀欢迎各位老板加入M.GAME娱乐城! ⚡️官方客服:@CSKH ⚡️官方飞投:@mgamezh_bot ⚡️官方频道:@mgame9527 ⚡️代理招商:@PaiGu008 ⚡️注册网址:M.GAME【USDT】 ⚡️注册网址:M.GAME【人民币】
🔥1
🫤😐🫥😶🤥🫠🤫🫡🫢 😑 N9 国际认证 | 信誉平台 支持5倍验资 【验资:@N9KF】 担保域名:N9.TOP 点击查看 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 💝 新会员好礼 注册就送28.8U 新人首存/二存/三存最高赠送8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣U 💝 老会员好礼 电子狂欢每日存款赠送10% 充值笔笔送3%无上限 夜间充值最高可优惠8888U ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 香港六合彩 4️⃣8️⃣.8️⃣ 倍 加拿大28全网返水最高 ⚡️注册网址:N9.PRO 😇🧐🧐😗🧐😙😄 ⚡️ 官方客服: @N9KF ⚡️ 官方飞投: @N9N9 ⚡️ 彩票客服: @N9CP ⚡️ 彩票飞投: @N9N9N9 ⚡️ 福利频道: @N9pd888 ⚡️ 注册网址: N9.COM【USDT】 ⚡️ 注册网址: N9.C…
🔥1
🔸0.1 TRX= 1 笔能量 🔸0.2 TRX= 2 笔能量 例 先转 0.1 个TRX 到下方↓地址,再去转U不扣 TRX手续费 TEDGxoYRdBBqRUzLZPDbD3CkDbtryXLLCd (点击↑地址自动复制)0.1TRX未到账请转2TRX方可稳定到账! 向交易所地址或对方地址无U转账需租赁两笔能量。 最高汇率购买TRX.笔数套餐免费能量每日每位用户可免费租赁3—6笔能量 进入全能机器人→ @RR321bot 客服 @tuikuangbot💁♀️
【幻想自己】
👍1
Voice message, posted without a caption
👏1
家人们,我操他死🐴我来迪拜三年了,那不是当狗推就是当狗推,那公司根本就没把我当人,操你妈天天就是打字,天天在网络上面装人妖,要装同性恋,在这里打字。 我受不了了,现在我希望,真正的家人们跟我在水滴筹那个App里面给我凑一张回国的机票,两天之内如果凑不到我就自己去中国大使馆,我就自首了家人们。 #宫本武藏 follow
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤3
啊家人们,她如果是个女的是少体重200斤往上走,那个手机相册里面有一张他本人的照片,他这个声音是2012年哪种食物流行,那个CF刷枪知道家人们,那种片QB他的声音和2016年他又去干那种什么网上兼职那个宝妈刷单的那种。 #宫本武藏 follow
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤1👍1🔥1
亚博千万不能去家人们,公司操你妈一个组10个人,九个得新冠,还有一个得了那个小性病家人们。 #宫本武藏 follow
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤2👍1👎1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @yuyinku. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 555,911 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“宫本武藏语音包|搞笑语音库” (@yuyinku), 10,176 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yuyinku.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.