Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 心悦瑶浴spa亲测榜🛁

Channel

心悦瑶浴spa亲测榜🛁

@yushuihuibaogao

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

251subscribers

-91 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004455499890
TypeChannel
Username@yushuihuibaogao
Created24 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 September 2026
Last confirmed live13 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/yushuihuibaogao

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

251342296.59 September 2026 — 342 subscribers9 September 2026 — 342 subscribers11 September 2026 — 341 subscribers2 October 2026 — 271 subscribers13 October 2026 — 251 subscribers9 September 202613 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 33 days, net -91. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 237–356 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Oct 2026, 04:38251-20
2 Oct 2026, 09:21271-70
11 Sept 2026, 18:39341-1
9 Sept 2026, 21:22342no change
9 Sept 2026, 20:47342first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 06:36 UTC360 viewsread 9 September 2026
Forwarded from @GZNMMTL

【嫩妹报告】https://telegram.me/GZNMHEJI 【老师艺名】6666 【联系方式】小韦同学 【所在位置】粤垦路 【验证留名】k kkkkk 【验证时间】8.16 【修车费用】310活动直享券 【颜值身材】9分 【服务内容】8分 【服务态度】8分 【优点缺点】身材苗条性感 【推荐程度】8分 【体验细节】上楼后简单沟通,小哥直接领我进房间,里边有浴缸不必单独先去公共澡堂洗澡。静待几分钟后6666进来,穿着一条超短裙非常性感,随后浴缸接水准备泡澡。热水流太小后来小哥打了桶热水进来加快进展,泡完牛奶澡开始进入正题。ls脱bar开始A面服务,0011,亲咪等等就略过了。🐻大概b+左右,身材很不错,非常的性感,不得不说看着真的挺标致。为了满足我浅浅🐍。ls问了几次我俩是不是曾经见过(我大众脸肯定不是),服务后开始边亲咪边帮我手打。可能没休息好,第一次上油没找对感觉,好一会才出。随后到浴缸清洗一下。第二发换她躺床上,我想…

15 Aug 2026, 03:43 UTC447 views6 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

▶️报告跳转导航▶️ NO:6666 报告1 NO:1111 报告1 NO:188 报告1 NO:33 报告1 NO:02 报告1 NO:9888 报告1 NO:100 报告1

❤6

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @yushuihuibaogao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“心悦瑶浴spa亲测榜🛁” (@yushuihuibaogao), 251 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yushuihuibaogao.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.