Channel photo updated

Channel
Глеб Юрков | Reels под ключ & AI
@yurkov_design
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,389subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002173618802 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yurkov_design |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yurkov_design |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 1,389 | -8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 1,397 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 1,404 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 1,403 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 1,403 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 2 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- —
- no view readings in window
- Avg views / post
- —
- no view readings
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (2 April 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | — |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 29s
- Average length
- 29s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
553 reactions across 13 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 206 | 37.3% | |
| ❤ | 180 | 32.5% | |
| 👍 | 103 | 18.6% | |
| 🍌 | 36 | 6.51% | |
| ⚡ | 8 | 1.45% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 0.723% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.542% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 0.542% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.362% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 0.362% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 0.362% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.362% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.362% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 553reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yurkov_design. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 April 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
📖 Это Начало Большего... (Многое изменилось) P.S: смотри ролик 📨 Получить монтаж и охваты | Портфолио | Отзывы Ответы на вопросы / Новый канал
❤15🔥9👍6
✈️ AIR DROP — МЫ ВЗЛЕТАЕМ! Закрытый дроп для дизайнеров, селлеров и предпринимателей Мы объединили авторов, дизайнеров и студию, чтобы сделать не обычный розыгрыш, а полезный дроп с материалами по визуальной упаковке, маркетплейсам и дизайну 📂 Внутри разлетевшегося ящика: — денежные призы для участников — подборка сильных каналов дизайнеров — материалы по инфографике, карточкам и не только — чек-листы для селлеро…
🔥23❤12👍11🎉2🥰2
📱 Карточка За 10 Минут (твои самые лёгкие +2к₽) — А всё, доступ прикрыт, не успел) Автофокус на лице прям шалит, качество вышло таксе в начале и конце( Не сомневаюсь, скоро исправлю и проблемы с микро, ошибку понял, харашо? 🔈 {🔥} — Глеба, посмотрю конеш!
❤18🔥15👍7
Как я в 15 лет размножил🤩🤩🤩до 400тыс₽ ? — Беги смотреть на ютуб — Лежи на диване и смотри на ютубе — Кушай и смотри на ютубе Друзья, сегодня счастливый вторник — я выложил второе видео на ютуб! Ваще горд собой) {🔥} — Там и третье с четвёртым не за горами) ваши ожидания не подведу
🔥19❤7👍6👏2🤔2
😁😆😁 проект нужно сдать в понедельник, иначе кранты ПРОЙТИ ОПРОС И ПОЛУЧИТЬ РЕСПЕКТ, УВАЖУХУ (клик, 2 минуты) — Коллеги, многовато конеш прошу, но пройдите опрос, сегодня не хочу мучать вас лекциями, всех обнял ❤️ P.S: мне нужно сдавать итоговый индивидуальный проект Кстати, уже в этот понедельник (без ваших голосов мб не перейду в 10 класс)
🔥32❤21👍13
👨🎨 Не умеешь ты цвета выбирать Смотришь на свой дизайн и вроде всё ок… Но, ёпт, чота не так 1️⃣ Не начинай с цветов Сначала смысл: что ты продаёшь, для кого, какое настроение Премиум? → спокойные, тёмные, сдержанные Дешёвое? → ярче, контрастнее, проще Цвет — это не основа, а дополнение - 2️⃣ Бери готовые базы, а не из головы Самая частая ошибка новичка: открыть цвета и “на глаз” собрать радугу 🌈 Как вариант: …
❤22👍16🔥12❤🔥3
В наше время нужно качать не бицуху, а фокус внимания 💪 — Тренируешься? А сможешь хотя бы пары часов работать не отвлекаясь? — Не сможешь. 😐 Телега, YouTube, пинтерест, тик ток, "щас гляну мотивашку"… — и вот ты уже 40 минут "типа работаешь", но проект как был пустой, так и остался Формула фокуса: — 1 задача — 0 отвлечений — таймер — повтор каждый день - Перед работой: — на столе только комп + вода — телефон убр…
🔥28👍12❤11🍌2💋2
Устал? Прокрастинируешь? А может ещё и ленту смотришь?! Фрилансер в наши дни: — устал — открыл YouTube — залип на 40 минут (мож больше) — закрыл — стал ещё более уставшим И потом: почему я выгорел? Плохая новость: большинство твоего отдыха — это не отдых, а хорошая: я всё испробовал, могу спасти и твою жизнь 😇 Тело (самый недооценённый буст): — выйти пройтись (желательно не до холодильника) — лёгкая растяжка и…
🔥31❤15👍10💘2🍌1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥6
Ну всё. Твоё время вышло ⚡️ — Прошло уже больше 48 часов, хотел дать возможность попробовать это и тебе, но к сожалению - стартовая цена закрыта Честно говоря я сам удивился сколько людей зашло за эти два дня 🤭 Я дал серьёзную инфу за символическую плату - систему поиска клиентов, правила переписок, разбор ценообразования Всё, на что ушло месяцы на выстраивание - упаковал в один продукт Кто успел - уже внутри и …
🍌33❤13⚡8
🙂 Самое частое, что мне пишут после выхода гайда: «Глеб, хочу - но сейчас нет времени» — Да-да, понимаю 😀 Я сам совмещал дизайн с учёбой в 14 лет, школа каждый день, домашние задания никто не отменял, и при этом - первые заказы, первые деньги Чтобы закрыть первого клиента по советам из продукта нужно 1-2 часа в день {Не 8 часов} {Не бросать учёбу или работу} {Не сидеть до 3 ночи} Те кто уже внутри - студенты, лю…
❤16🔥8👍5🥴2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @yurkov_design. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 606,478 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@yurkov_design named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 15 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Глеб Юрков | Reels под ключ & AI” (@yurkov_design), 1,389 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yurkov_design.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.