Channel
@otziv_yurkov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003626800604 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @otziv_yurkov |
| Created | 22 February 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/otziv_yurkov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 17 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 17 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 22 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
110 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 46 | 41.8% | |
| ⚡ | 35 | 31.8% | |
| 🏆 | 29 | 26.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 February 2026 to 7 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Хочу оставить отзыв об обучении от Глеба! Спасибо за инфу которую предоставил, очень хорошо объяснил, думаю обучение сами больше подойдет для новичков но и для опытных тоже норм, так что советую
🔥3⚡1🏆1
Просмотрев несколько видео из курса Глеба, я был очень впечатлён! В его гайдах всё кратко, понятно и по делу. Я разобрался в нейро сетях, которые в наше время очень важны в инфографике, в создании портфолио на разных площадках для поиска клиентов и во многом другом. Огромное спасибо за курс Глебу❤️🩹
🔥2⚡1🏆1
Курс понравился: материал подан понятно, без воды, и сразу видно, как применять на практике. Стало легче находить потенциальных покупателей и выстраивать работу системно. Рекомендую тем, кто хочет быстро усилить продажи и действовать по проверенным алгоритмам!
🔥2⚡1🏆1
Очень полезный курс, уже применил и реально помогло. Вся информация в одном месте и не нужно искать по разным источникам. Сразу понял, как искать первых клиентов и с чего начинать
🔥2⚡1🏆1
курс реально классный, спасибо тебе
⚡4🔥4🏆3
За свою цену, ну ооочень ценный продукт. Глеб реально запарился над презентациями и подачей - Уроки очень информативные. Под каждым из 15 уроков расписанные таймкоды, а также закрепленные ссылки и промпты Брал тариф с обратной связью, Глеб в сети 24/7 и отвечает моментально. С нею все круто Вчера долго мучался и не мог сгенерировать определенный ракурс к заказу. В одном из уроков нашел решение Советы Глеба реальн…
⚡4🔥4🏆3
Изучение курса Глеба начал с отличным настроением, т.к. уроки в нём были короткими, а содержимое уроков было без воды, это жирный плюс! Я был рад покупке курса, потому что смог начать лучше осваивать нейронки, и внедрять их в свои дизайн-макеты. Большое спасибо!
⚡4🏆3🔥3
В курсе все утраивает Больше всего понравилась подача материала которой нет у других дизайнеров
🏆4⚡3🔥3
Привет брат вчера по твоему гайду нашел первого клиента
🔥4⚡3🏆3
Продукт просто пушка! Глеб всё четко и живо преподнес. Полученные знания универсальны и выходят далеко за рамки ниши инфографики. Курс очень полезный, он заметно ускоряет работу – будете делать в два раза быстрее! 🔥
⚡3🔥3🏆2
Офигенный продукт! Очень доволен покупкой) Классная подача: живо, интересно и явно с душой. Видно, что Глеб действительно увлечён своим делом и хочет делиться знаниями с другими Минусов не нашёл 😁
🔥6⚡4🏆3
Курс классный) Всё понятно и по делу, наблюдал за тобой и заинтересовали нейросети, теперь могу применять своих проектах, остался доволен 🙂
🔥5⚡3🏆2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @otziv_yurkov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 309,997 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Отзывы обучение — Глеб Юрков 🎓” (@otziv_yurkov), 17 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/otziv_yurkov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.