9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +211. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 37,900โ38,175 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 03:56
38,143
+21
12 Aug 2026, 07:23
38,122
+21
11 Aug 2026, 08:24
38,101
+20
10 Aug 2026, 11:14
38,081
+38
9 Aug 2026, 07:54
38,043
+23
8 Aug 2026, 10:59
38,020
+28
7 Aug 2026, 12:55
37,992
+35
6 Aug 2026, 15:18
37,957
+25
6 Aug 2026, 03:06
37,932
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
49.4%
avg views รท 38,143 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,800
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.3%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
23 (20 July 2026 โ 12 August 2026)
Views total
433,030
Reactions total
1,301
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,236 reactions across 22 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
โค
462
37.4%
๐คช
213
17.2%
๐
164
13.3%
๐ฅ
157
12.7%
๐
54
4.37%
๐ค
31
2.51%
๐
19
1.54%
๐ค
19
1.54%
๐คจ
18
1.46%
โก
17
1.38%
๐ญ
10
0.809%
โคโ๐ฅ
9
0.728%
๐
9
0.728%
๐
9
0.728%
๐
9
0.728%
๐
5
0.405%
๐
5
0.405%
๐
4
0.324%
๐
3
0.243%
๐
3
0.243%
11 further kinds
16
1.29%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 1,301reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 23 we hold a reading for ยท 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @yuriiroot. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Hi everyone,
I uploaded the new version (oss-166) and all of future version updates will be visible in the root manager too (it will download the release version through GitHub)
You can use this code if you want to implement a similar update checker mechanism (you will need a hosting service, also you will need to edit the code for version calculations):
https://github.com/frknkrc44/HMA-OSS/tree/update-checker
Thaโฆ
โค41๐ฅ4๐3
Signed VD Priv8 (VD171) ๐ง๐ท๐ท๐บ๐ฎ๐ณ๐จ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ท
COPG-VD v5.1.0
The most effective Global Device Spoofer.
Download: https://t.me/RootDetected/4049
Source code & How to use: https://github.com/VD171/COPG-VD
Changelog:
- The Android version is no longer spoofed. ANDROID_VERSION, SDK_INT, SDK_FULL and CODENAME describe the ROM, not the build being spoofed. A device told its SDK is newer than it really is has apps calling APIs its framework does not have: Google's apโฆ
โค24๐ญ7๐5๐คฏ1
Signed VD Priv8 (VD171) ๐ง๐ท๐ท๐บ๐ฎ๐ณ๐จ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ท
COPG-VD v5.0.1
The most effective Global Device Spoofer.
Download: https://t.me/RootDetected/3988
Source code & How to use: https://github.com/VD171/COPG-VD
Changelog:
- Updated FINGERPRINT and Build info to: ZP11.260618.005.
- Added auto-update, from the WebUI (Check Update / Update Now) or once per boot.
. Can be turned off in the WebUI: "Auto-update JSON on boot".
- A daily workflow keeps COPG-VD.json.example onโฆ
โค43๐4๐ญ3๐ฅ2๐ฟ2
Signed VD Priv8 (VD171) ๐ง๐ท๐ท๐บ๐ฎ๐ณ๐จ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ท
New soft-root tools dropped !
Two interesting projects using the same public kernel vuln (GhostLock) for temporary root (no bootloader unlock):
- Root My Galaxy (Samsung)
- Root My Pixel (Pixel devices)
- Root My OnePlus
Both give temporary KernelSU / ReSukiSU root on supported firmware. Root is lost after reboot and only works on specific builds for now.
Worth keeping an eye on if youโre on a supported device.
โค59๐ฅ11๐ค8
Signed VD Priv8 (VD171) ๐ง๐ท๐ท๐บ๐ฎ๐ณ๐จ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ท
TrickyStoreOSS is back and its BIG!
Today marks the release of TrickyStoreOSS v3.0.0 packed with major refactoring and detection fixes that push our implementation ahead of the proprietary alternative.
Never knew a project born out of pure frustration would grow into something this big, let it be the countless number of forks or the contributions made. This project has run on community support and love from day oneโฆ
โค98๐19๐ฅ8โก5๐คช3๐3๐ค1
Signed VD Priv8 (VD171) ๐ง๐ท๐ท๐บ๐ฎ๐ณ๐จ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ท
I wish everyone would just leave each other alone. I didn't do anything to affect bad him, but he deliberately wants to create drama to attract viewers.
There is a person is a hypocrite. He always justifies it by saying "I don't hate you,"while the post remains the same, the lies and baseless accusations remain. Just tell the truth. I know that anyone like -> hate. That's perfectly normal.
Please find me a post that criticizes Android root developers.
๐คช20โค3๐3๐1
Signed ๐ฌ๐๐ฟ๐ถ
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @yuriiroot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank โ 161,574 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐๐๐โ (@yuriiroot), 38,143 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yuriiroot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.