Косметолог без иголок
Лазер нового поколения
Восковая депиляция
Записаться
https://n309733.yclients.com/
Здесь всё так же интересно про косметику, уходы за лицом, интересные обзоры баночек
Показываю работу в моменте
Created
Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 137–139 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 22:46
138
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:26
138
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
50.7%
avg views ÷ 138 subscribers
Avg views / post
69.9
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
18 (19 July 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
1,259
Reactions total
79
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
261
Videos
51
Links
34
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
79 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
60
75.9%
🔥
9
11.4%
👍
4
5.06%
😱
3
3.80%
🤣
3
3.80%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как же меня задолбало, что лазерную эпиляцию умудряются продавать за копейки, работать на весьма посредственном оборудовании, а потом класть на бикини хладпак из холодильника.
И знаете, что самое обидное?
После такого опыта вы приходите ко мне и говорите:
«Я больше не верю в лазер».
Я вас понимаю.
Потому что если вам было больно, горячо, неприятно, а результата вы толком не увидели — очень легко решить, что лазерная…
Вот это шок у меня сегодня случился.
Вот этот вакууматор, который я купила за 1 рубль, стал в 3 раза дороже и деньгами и звездами ОЗОН.
Это я пошла тратить
свои 27 звезд Озон и покупать товар за 1 рубль.
Выбрала себе очень няшную ( розовую) сковороду марки КУКМАРА
Вы уже копите звезды, что покупали?
Я впервые за долгое время почувствовала себя просто клиентом.
И вдруг поняла одну очень важную вещь.
Мы с моим мастером по волосам видимся всего раз в 4–6 месяцев @kudri_saratov
И каждый раз происходит одно и то же.
Я сажусь в кресло... и просто расслабляюсь.
Не анализирую.
Не контролирую.
Не думаю, правильно ли всё делают.
В конце спрашиваю:
— Всё? Что мне теперь делать?
А она достает свои «волшебные баночки»...
…
Вчера так расстроилась, что мало откликов на посты, рилс и сториззз
А встала утром а тут праздник для меня.
Спасибо каждому за ваш лайк.
Вы не представляете какая работа вокруг этого идёт ежедневно....
Шлю вам лучи добра ❣️❤️🐛
Рубрика #юначитает
Мы сегодня заехали в библиотеку сдать Тома Сойера и в разговоре с библиотекарем, мне напомнили о серии книг "Маленькие женщины".( эту серию я оставила на потом)
Я пошла в зал подростковых книг и пропала.....
А об одной книге, когда библиотекарь мне рассказывала, у нее были полные глаза слез... невероятные женщины работают в этом месте. Обожаю их..
Честно скажу, что ранее не была знакомы с тво…
Если вы думаете, я вся такая осознанная, читающая составы и обдумываю покупки....
Вот вам подкаст 😲
Там просто треш...
❤1
Signed Юна
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @yuna_talk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@yuna_talk named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@kudri_saratov named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юна говорит о...” (@yuna_talk), 138 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yuna_talk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.