Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 56 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 116–123 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Oct 2026, 12:18
117
-2
16 Sept 2026, 19:38
119
-1
9 Sept 2026, 21:19
120
-2
31 Aug 2026, 15:37
122
+2
9 Aug 2026, 04:02
120
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:10
120
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 7 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 12s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
143 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
57
39.9%
👍
34
23.8%
❤
22
15.4%
❤🔥
16
11.2%
custom 5449816553727998023
5
3.50%
custom 5438496463044752972
4
2.80%
🎄
3
2.10%
😍
2
1.40%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 October 2025 to 23 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 15 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yumi_3d. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 October 2025 to 23 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сейчас нахожусь в парке Галицкого 🍃 решила заснять для вас новую локацию и поделиться наблюдением, почему это маркетинг «чистой воды» 🙂🔬
Тренд последних локаций - интерактивная игра света и воды. Визуальные эффекты этой игры притягивают людей и наполняют пространство. Они имеют свой язык передачи.
Вообще все световые шоу - это контент и сильный маркетинг. Он выбивает человека из инфошума и фокусирует внимание на ло…
❓Имеет ли смысл творчество, если его никто не оценит?
Если убрать зрителей и чужие оценки, начинается монолог в пустой комнате. Но в итоге всё равно стоишь перед главным критиком — собой, от которого не уйти.
В век Интернета, где мы видим только лучшие результаты других в рилсах, возникает неадекватное сравнение: свой хаотичный процесс «сейчас» — и чей-то вылизанный до идеала результат. Восприятие искажается, появл…
2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣6️⃣ Поздравляю с Новым годом !!! 🪩 🎄
Желаю в куранты полностью погрузиться в атмосферу праздника, и только приятной суеты. Забыть о тревогах и прочем неважном в этот день. Возьмите с собой только лучшее и лучших.
Для вас запустила салют не просто в Звездную ночь, а уже в Новогоднюю Звездную ночь 🌟💫 Салют — прямо в репродукцию Ван Гога, которую я создала в 3D.
Практика желания: В момент, когда все загадываю…
🎅Хо-хо-хотела я вам подарки подарить, а вы не захотели брать, чтож 😁
В посте нужно было написать одно слово, и высказать желание. Спасибо активным, готовлю вам подарки 🎁
Чтобы что-то получить, достаточно сделать действие 🍸
⛲️ DAY Фонтан своими руками
Последние два месяца я создавала фонтан — проект, который стал для меня настоящим экспериментом. Мне было важно проверить, насколько меня притягивает сложное ручное творчество по сравнению с цифровым.
Честно: ручной труд — это безумно сложно. Нейросеть помогла только с референсами, и то — по моему подробному описанию.
Я сохранила весь процесс на видео — приятного просмотра 🤍
💡Обычно люди, которые заказывают 3D для своих проектов, не только мыслят креативно, но и отличаются высокой активностью. Они часто организаторы или участники мероприятий, выставок, развивают онлайн и офлайн бизнесы.
Когда активные люди приходят ко мне в работу, они неизбежно попадают под мою «креативную раздачу». Так уж выходит, что на каждую их активность у меня уже есть идея — и мы её реализуем.
Так на прошлых вы…
Интересное стечение обстоятельств, что ИИ первым коснулся творческих профессий. Базовые настройки впитываются из креатива и человеческого сотворчества.
Я думаю, что это достаточно закономерно, поскольку глобально на творчестве построен мир и культура общества. Именно творчество привело к развитию строительства, технологий и общего бизнеса, оно поднимало вопрос реализации идеи в жизнь.
Условно: «Вот мы придумали, и …
3D vs Ювелир
Существует спор, в котором старая школа не воспринимает 3D как творчество. 🧑🎨
Попробовала записать рилс по теме в формате спарринга. Как вам?)
Скоро Новый год 🎄 хочу разыграть подарки: новогодние украшения для елочки с 3D принтера. Как вам идея?
Пишите «участвую» под постом, и рандомайзером выберу победителей 💕🤗 до декабря справимся ?)
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Каждый день должен быть красивым, верно? 💕
Существуют отдельное направление украшений в 3D печати. Можно вообще создать серию украшений на неделю, месяц, и сиять по-новому ✨
❤🔥5👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @yumi_3d. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 October 2025 to 23 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“YUMI | 3D Графика” (@yumi_3d), 117 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yumi_3d.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.