Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

YUME

@yumeepng

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

206subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002253171852
TypeChannel
Username@yumeepng
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yumeepng

Growth

2042062058 Aug 2026, 10:56 — 204 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:18 — 204 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 01:13 — 206 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:569 Aug 2026, 01:13
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 204–206 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 01:13206+2
8 Aug 2026, 11:18204no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:56204first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
109.5%
avg views ÷ 206 subscribers
Avg views / post
226
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held15 (21 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total2,933
Reactions total155
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

155 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53617447918748370443421.9%
3421.9%
custom 52354345968829877513220.6%
🥰1610.3%
💘117.10%
❤‍🔥106.45%
custom 528525345155767356974.52%
👾31.94%
💅31.94%
🦄31.94%
😘21.29%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 14 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yumeepng. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
6.67%
1 of 15 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
74.0
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
84.0
over 12 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjdWzspe14 August 20264 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC17 views7 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

сделала лист для оски, теперь покажу вам эту леди 💚 пасиба за звездочки 🫶

custom 523543459688298775151custom 53617447918748370441

7 Aug 2026, 21:07 UTC29 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ребятки я решила вести тик ток, буду рада если вы пошебуршите немного 💜💚 ссылка апд я не крутила ничо это старый аккаунт где были анимации

4😘2💅1

7 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC48 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

какой ажиотаж на с*ськи. я вас поняла. будет больше афигеть, спасибо за звездочки винчик 💚

🥰73💅2

6 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC84 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

я знаю, что вы не спите.

8🦄3❤‍🔥2custom 52354345968829877511

6 Aug 2026, 21:09 UTC≈2,110 views20 reactions15 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

скромный гифтик для именинника 💅 (в коммы кину еще 2 варианта)

custom 52354345968829877519custom 53617447918748370446👾3❤‍🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 21:07 UTC30 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @shzhivinciPhoto

🤍🤍🤍HAPPY B-DAY TO ME 🤍 🤍🤍🤍сегодня мне исполнилось 19 лет 🤍🤍🤍 несмотря на то, сколько жести у меня произошло в жизни за этот год я рада, что у меня есть этот канал и такая замечательная аудитория. спасибо всем за то, что вы продолжаете следить за моим творчеством, помогаете продвигать его и вдохновляете меня своими комментариями по традиции лучший подарок для художника - репост его работ. очень хотелось бы добить 4к 🤩

2

5 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC74 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

не теряйте

custom 523543459688298775182

4 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC85 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

как бы вас на реакции забайтить

🥰6💘4custom 53617447918748370442custom 52354345968829877511

4 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC85 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

и поближе (херовенько обрезалось конечно я пыталась пополам)

8custom 53617447918748370445💘3❤‍🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC108 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

представляю вам 20,5 часов моей жизни:

custom 52354345968829877517custom 53617447918748370445❤‍🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @yumeepng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,133,064 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“YUME” (@yumeepng), 206 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yumeepng.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.