3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,041–1,044 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 11:25
1,041
-3
8 Aug 2026, 00:19
1,044
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:21
1,044
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.0%
avg views ÷ 1,041 subscribers
Avg views / post
209
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
20.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held
20 (19 February 2026 – 26 July 2026)
Views total
417
Reactions total
86
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 00:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
23m 43s
Average length
2m 58s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,095 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
252
23.0%
❤
198
18.1%
💯
171
15.6%
❤🔥
163
14.9%
👍
150
13.7%
🤯
36
3.29%
👏
31
2.83%
🙈
30
2.74%
💔
21
1.92%
😱
18
1.64%
🕊
12
1.10%
😁
3
0.274%
💩
2
0.183%
😭
2
0.183%
🤣
2
0.183%
🥴
2
0.183%
👀
1
0.091%
👎
1
0.091%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,095reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yulyakrap. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 February 2026 to 26 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📜 ОКЛЕВЕТАННЫЙ ГОСУДАРЬ: ПРАВДА О «ПОГРОМЕ» В НОВГОРОДЕ 1570 ГОДА
В учебниках Иван Грозный — тиран, который утопил Новгород в крови. А в реальности всё было иначе. Возьмём простой факт: зима 1570 года была такой суровой, что Волхов промёрз до дна. И тут историки пишут про лодки и багры — как будто лёд специально разбивали, чтобы устроить «резню». Звучит нелепо? Именно. Эта сцена почти дословно скопирована с разорени…
"Русский народ за свою историю отобрал, сохранил, возвел в степень уважения такие человеческие качества, которые не подлежат пересмотру: честность, трудолюбие, совестливость, доброту. Мы из всех исторических катастроф вынесли и сохранили в чистоте великий русский язык, он передан нам нашими дедами и отцами.
Уверуй, что все было не зря: наши песни, наши сказки, наши неимоверной тяжести победы, наше страдание — не отд…
Сатирический киножурнал «Фитиль».
2008 год.
Как обычно, по методичке, все было озвучено заранее.
Ну а остальное - молчаливое согласие и свобода воли.
Включаться или нет - решать исключительно вам.
Учёные выяснили, что добавки с омега-3 не улучшают память и когнитивные способности, а также не защищают клетки мозга
Поэтому использовать их для профилактики деменции и болезни Альцгеймера бессмысленно, говорится в исследовании The Lancet.
Миф об эффективности омега-3 связывают с тем, что любители рыбы чаще правильно питаются и ведут здоровый образ жизни — именно это снижает риск деменции.
КК 🐀
В последнее время церковью и ее адептами активно разгоняется тема, что у славян было многоженство.
Еще один удобный миф от РПЦ, которым удобно манипулировать , и, оправдывая наличие у своих же прихожан и у себя самих несколько жен или сожительниц, и, вкидывая ложь о том, что ранее на Руси было это явление.
Не спорю, что польско-литовская публика во главе с Филаретом (провозгласившим потом себя Романовым и прямым на…
Михаил Николаевич Задорнов — «Дядя Миша»! — об Аркаиме:
Западные и наши прозападные ученые справедливо задают вопрос: где доказательства, что этот высокодуховный народ существовал на территории России? В Греции, на Крите, в Риме, в Израиле, в Египте — всюду остались следы развитых цивилизаций. А где они в России?
Долгое время, действительно, доказательств было недостаточно. Но в восьмидесятые годы на Южном Урале на…
Если вы поймёте , что Исус - это Солнце, потому что вся религия - это по сути аллегория и олицетворение, как и вся мифология, когда природные явления наделяются человеческими качествами для лучшего понимания и донесения информации, то вами уже невозможно будет управлять 👌🏻.
Все подчиняется конам природы, так было, так есть и так будет всегда. Все остальное - фальсификации, манипуляции, инструменты управления, костыл…
Бу! Сказка про страшный и опасный! 😉 ХОЛЕСТЕРИН!
Холестерин в кровь почти не поступает из пищи (это не более 20%).
Около 70–80% всего холестерина в организме синтезируется в печени.
Наш организм не дурак! А мудрая система!
Когда вы поглощаете еду, содержащую холестерин, ваше тело его использует. Если вы поглощаете много холестерина, тело уменьшит его производство. Если вы не поглощаете много холестерина, тело увелич…
«Если вы заботитесь о своём пищеварении — мой добрый совет: не говорите за обедом о большевизме и о медицине. И, боже вас сохрани, не читайте до обеда советских газет!».
(Профессор Преображенский «Собачье сердце»)
Да. Вся суть религий и их адептов в одном видео. Потому что Бог - внутри нас. Вы и есть Бог, его частичка, его дитя. Без всей этой атрибутики и ритуалов. Без всего это лицемерия набожности и свечек.
Бог не в куличе… а что если этот пес и был он сам ? Ведь это он и был 🙏
Полное интервью с Андреем Ильичем Фурсовым :
https://youtu.be/trvYYRwl8cs?is=ebzprzOl-FrDs7xI
👍23❤12👏5❤🔥1👀1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yulyakrap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 962,950 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Крапива” (@yulyakrap), 1,041 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yulyakrap.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
