Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 36 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 88–90 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Sept 2026, 03:15
88
-1
5 Sept 2026, 02:14
89
-1
9 Aug 2026, 14:33
90
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:39
90
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 13 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
28s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
77 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
26
33.8%
❤
23
29.9%
👍
13
16.9%
👏
8
10.4%
😁
2
2.60%
🤔
2
2.60%
🤝
2
2.60%
🥰
1
1.30%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 10 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Когда корпоративная схема не спасает от семейного спора. Свежий вывод Верховного суда
👨👩 Супруги в браке купили 100 000 акций (100%) акционерного общества – совместное имущество, хотя в реестре акционеров единственным участником и директором значился муж.
Летом отношения фактически прекратились, и жена обратилась в суд общей юрисдикции с иском о расторжении брака и разделе общего имущества, включая эти акции.
Уже п…
И ещё один вопрос, уже про вас)
Вы бы сами согласились на брак, где страсти мало, зато есть спокойствие, опора и понятные договорённости?
Или для вас это уже предательство себя?
Но это так... для размышлений)
Меня тема браков по расчёту так зацепила, что я реально полезла в историю.
Хотелось найти живой пример, когда расчёт есть, но людей это не превращает в холодных партнёров по сделке.
В России брак Николая I и Александры Фёдоровны изначально был чистым династический проектом.
Выгодная партия, политика, отношения России и Пруссии, всё по правилам большого расчёта.
Но если смотреть не только на дипломатию, а на быто…
Друзья, я давно уже подготовила для вас много интересного, но к сожалению очень сложно держать ритм, когда постоянные отключения интернета и блокировки.
Я и так-то не страдаю дисциплиной)) а тут еще и столько поводов😂
Поставила себе в ближайшие задачи реанимировать Вк, изучить макс и что там еще из новенького))
Так интересно в жизни получается: когда у меня была возможность проявляться, я боялась, не была готова и…
Предыдущий пост про брак "ради бизнеса", меня заставил задуматься о браках "по расчёту".
Для меня это не одно и тоже.
Столько мыслей😏
Разных))
Попробую сформулировать и поделюсь с вами❤️
Пока подбираю слова, расскажите, как вы относитесь к таким бракам?
МЫ ВМЕСТЕ РАДИ БИЗНЕСА, НО НЕ РАДИ ЖИЗНИ
Есть пары, которые фактически давно уже не муж и жена.
Они партнёры по бизнесу, совладельцы ипотеки, соавторы детей. Но не партнёры по жизни.
Утром - планёрка: кто отвезёт ребёнка, кто поедет на встречу, кто оплатит поставку.
Вечером - сводка: «как прошёл день», «что с контрактом», «не забудь отчёт».
Тепла нет. Близости нет. Поддержки - минимум. Есть функциональность и п…
У нас с мужем с прошлого года появилась весенняя забава😃
В Краснодаре есть улица на которой вдоль трамваных путей весной цветут сливы.
Забава заключается в том, что мы садимся на заднюю площадку трамвая и проезжаем несколько остановок.🚃
Цветение несколько дней и в прошлом году мы не успели на розовые (самые красивые) .
Но белые тоже впечаляют😍
В этом году усилила контроль😂
А это видео с прошлой поездки!
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @yuliavidiaeva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 10 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юлия Видяева|Бизнес&Семья” (@yuliavidiaeva), 88 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yuliavidiaeva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.