قسمت لینک های منقضی فن کافه رو بخون میتونی دان کنی
Signed saghar🌾

Channel
@yugyeom_Answer_one
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001400329142 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yugyeom_Answer_one |
| Description | چنل سوال و جواب مکنه گات سون ❤️🤪 لینک ناشناس ادمین داخل همین چنل پین شده منتظر جواب توی همین چنل باشین🤚🏻😎 لیست #Hashtags های چنل |
| Created | Between 1 January 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yugyeom_Answer_one |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 6 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:50 | 6 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
قسمت لینک های منقضی فن کافه رو بخون میتونی دان کنی
Signed saghar🌾
این لایو ها نیستن جایی . اونایی هم ک توی فن کافه Got7 هست همه منقضی شدن من با سرور های مختلف باز کردم جواب نداد. 🥲🥲🥲
Signed saghar🌾
سلام میشه برین تو این چنل @korean_mix1 به شرکت کننده شماره38 رای بدین؟🥺 عکس جه بومیه🥺💚
Signed 𝒔𝒂𝒈𝒉𝒂𝒓🌾
https://youtu.be/xjx3OQCITPY اینه
Signed 𝒔𝒂𝒈𝒉𝒂𝒓🌾
اسم این آهنگ میدونی؟؟
Signed 𝒔𝒂𝒈𝒉𝒂𝒓🌾
به نکته خیلی ظریفی اشاره کردی🥲🥲 هم یوگیوم لایکش کرده هم یونگجه کامنت گذاشته
Signed Maede
https://t.me/c/1132150744/20841 اینا هیچی ، فقط شانس این فن پیجه رو داشتم الان اینجا نبودم:)
Signed Maede
قربانت دختر💋
Signed 𝒔𝒂𝒈𝒉𝒂𝒓🌾
عاشقتم مرسی برا زیرنویس🌼
Signed 𝒔𝒂𝒈𝒉𝒂𝒓🌾
couse today is 1April? 👀
Signed Maede
Was Yugyeom really dating? And he was in a relationship that lasted for two years, as he said today on the program
Signed Maede
والا ما خیلی اهلش نیستیم ولی داریم 😁 این ماله منه https://t.me/saghardaily این ماله مائده https://t.me/me_mythings
Signed 𝒔𝒂𝒈𝒉𝒂𝒓🌾
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yugyeom_Answer_one. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@yugyeom_Answer_one named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“yugyeom.Answer” (@yugyeom_Answer_one), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yugyeom_Answer_one.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.