Channel
@yugrbbb
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,271subscribers
+16 since we began measuring on 5 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001817383878 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yugrbbb |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yugrbbb |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:26 | 1,271 | +13 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:46 | 1,258 | +1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 09:04 | 1,257 | +1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 09:10 | 1,256 | -1 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 22:59 | 1,257 | -2 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 22:57 | 1,259 | +4 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 08:22 | 1,255 | no change |
| 5 Oct 2026, 07:47 | 1,255 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 14 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (14 September 2026 – 4 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,248 |
| Reactions total | 126 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Oct 2026, 08:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
512 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 239 | 46.7% | |
| custom 5456557401819873017 | 81 | 15.8% | |
| custom 5348346692934598479 | 45 | 8.79% | |
| 🤩 | 35 | 6.84% | |
| custom 5456321809978785842 | 29 | 5.66% | |
| custom 5456234858365877249 | 24 | 4.69% | |
| 💔 | 17 | 3.32% | |
| custom 5364282696639989088 | 15 | 2.93% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 2.73% | |
| custom 5280608865333842901 | 13 | 2.54% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 512 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 14 September 2026 to 4 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Недавно открыла для себя еще один интересный проект - Карьерный кодекс 👩💻 Суть в том, что ребята из МГУ берут интервью у опытных юристов и преподавателей и задают им вопросы, волнующие студентов. На старте карьеры, во время учебы в университете или сразу после ее окончания, таких вопросов возникает масса. А в этих интервью опытные практики делятся своими мыслями и советами 🤓. Посмотрела последнее интервью с Виктор…
❤18🤩5
У меня сейчас какой-то сложный период, навалилось много проблем в разных сферах. Столкнулась с выгоранием в работе, поэтому каждый рабочий день в последнее время ощущается как маленькая битва. Чувствую потребность в отдыхе, но отпуска не будет еще долго, поэтому стараюсь выдыхать по выходным. Занимаюсь тем, что приносит удовольствие - смотрю любимый сериал, вижусь с друзьями, раскрашиваю картину по номерам. А еще теп…
❤75💔15🤩13
🎙 МНЕНИЕ ❗️Мы не хотим, чтобы институт суда присяжных был ликвидирован Верховный Суд Российской Федерации 23 сентября представил предложения о реформе суда присяжных. Профессионального судью и присяжных предлагается объединить в одну коллегию, число заседателей сократить до четырех, а председательствующему разрешить давать разъяснения в совещательной комнате. В результате под прежним названием может возникнуть уже …
❤25🔥9🤩1
КМС по окошмариванию преподавателей ☕ Огромный плюс совмещения учебы на юрфаке с работой – это возможность получить консультацию по любому сложному вопросу, с которым вы столкнулись на практике, от сильного отраслевого специалиста. Такие возможности нужно ценить и активно использовать :) У меня только на 3 курсе появилась привычка задавать вопросы преподавателям. Больше всего я мучила преподов по нотариату и гпп, т…
❤79🤩16
По Вашему мнению реформирование суда с участием присяжных заседателей отразится на системе правосудия:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Предложение упразднить реформировать суд присяжных от ВС РФ ⚖️ Такая инициатива справедливо вызвала негативную реакцию у представителей юридического сообщества, я тут полностью солидарна. Какой смысл от суда присяжных, если в совещательной комнате вместе с присяжными заседателями будет находиться профессиональный участник процесса - судья? Если вы хотя бы немного соприкасались с тем, как на практике работает судеб…
❤42🔥5💔2
За час до окончания голосования сходили на участок Надеюсь, все успели сделать свой выбор, чтобы за вас его не сделал кто-нибудь другой 🙏🏻
custom 545655740181987301781custom 545632180997878584229custom 545623485836587724924
На выходных занималась обычным туризмом, теперь на очереди судебный! Субботу и воскресенье провели в Дубне, нам очень понравилось! Я была удивлена, что через Московскую область протекает Волга, мне почему-то казалось, что она где-то далеко 😊 (да, с географией не очень). Погуляли и хорошо отдохнули на берегу озера Лебяжье, посмотрели на канал имени Москвы и Волгу, конечно же. Сегодня снова в Московской области, но н…
custom 534834669293459847945custom 536428269663998908815custom 528060886533384290113
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @yugrbbb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
По Вашему мнению реформирование суда с участием присяжных заседателей отразится на системе правосудия:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 14 September 2026 to 4 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юлия Гребенщикова ⚖️” (@yugrbbb), 1,271 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yugrbbb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.