开课了,宝宝们💦💦
👍2🥰1

Channel
@yuejing16
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,424subscribers
+289 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002564619280 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yuejing16 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yuejing16 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 4,424 | -74 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 4,498 | -40 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 4,538 | -25 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 4,563 | -24 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 4,587 | +468 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 4,119 | -16 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 4,135 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (27 June 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,100 |
| Reactions total | 29 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
120 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 49 | 40.8% | |
| ❤ | 31 | 25.8% | |
| 🥰 | 25 | 20.8% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 4.17% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 4.17% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 2.50% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
开课了,宝宝们💦💦
👍2🥰1
后入舒服,插的好深,好爽😷
👍3🥰3🍌1
出击报告 (https://t.me/snmnmcvx16811) 验证留名:蓝猫 验证时间:8.12 老师花名:#悦静 城市坐标:#深圳 #龙岗 上课花费:800p 颜值身材:脸挺好看,气质温柔。乳头粉嫩,胸部手感软软的,整体身材看着舒服,比例也不错。 服务内容:见课表 出击体验:照片是本人,像邻居家的小妹儿,人很随和,性格好,配合度高,胸型饱满,手感极佳,皮肤爽滑,做起来比较放松,气氛比较舒畅松弛。她身体敏感,水出得挺多,反应也很真实,没有故意装的感觉。因为太舒服了,全程几乎没换姿势,我很快就完了。她也没有表现出不耐烦,还是很温柔地配合。整体氛围轻松,身体和心情都挺满足的,是一次舒服的体验,值得再返。 优点缺点:颜值、身材、服务态度都在线,没什么明显短板。人好看,态度也好,整体挺满意的 推荐程度:10/满分10.0分;(综合硬件(脸,熊,身材)和软件(服务,态度)等方面打分。自己更看重哪方面,给出打出这个分数的理由) 联系方…
❤2👍2🥰2💯1
此时此刻你身在何方 你可记得我年少的模样😘
👍3🥰2
出击报告:https://t.me/keyusj66111 验证留名:Anthony GD 上课时间:8.5 老师花名:#悦静 位置坐标:#龙岗 上课花费:800p 颜值身材:妥妥美人一名身材比例一绝 服务内容:课表都有 出击体验:和妹妹约好时间。来到房间。开门一看,妹妹颜值很高哦,五官很精致,特别发型和脸型很适配。比照片好看。妹妹比较高,穿衣显瘦,脱衣身材更顶。果断交了水费,抽烟闲聊一会。其实第一眼,妹妹是高冷,生人勿近。整体相处下来,妹妹其实是个憨憨。只是不晓得怎么和陌生人说话和接触,所以才不开枪装高冷。所以后面去的老哥可以适当热情主动点,妹妹很好相处的。 一起去洗漱,妹妹背影比较壮,但是正面呢又前凸后翘,大奶子,翘屁屁。妹妹会吸引的递上纸巾,然后温柔的帮着擦背。来到床上,开始A面,课表上有的服务都有,很全面。和妹妹在床上抱着好一会,看着侧颜的她,轻轻浅吻一下,揉着小白兔,很饱满。一路手不老实的向下,妹妹应该馒头逼逼吧。有很…
👍3❤2🍌2
直接上高速,爽到起飞🇦🇩
❤6👍3👏1🥰1
出击报告 (https://t.me/snmnmcvx16811) 验证留名:FFo 验证时间:7.29 老师花名:#悦静 城市坐标:#深圳 #龙岗 上课花费:800p 颜值身材:人很漂亮,也很温柔,个子高挑,大长腿 服务内容:课上服务都有 出击体验:悦静老师曲线玲珑,身材有型,颜值与照片几乎无差别,给人一种又甜又御的感觉,非常有魅力,让人一见就心动。 简单聊了几句就很快熟络起来。她个性随和健谈,氛围轻松舒适。之后一起陪浴,洗得比较用心。洗完上床,开始提供服务。 她的舌头灵活湿润,舔胸时特别舒服,口活也很出色——含得深、无齿感,还会细致地吸蛋蛋。调情完戴套正式开始,紧致度适中,反馈积极,过程中很有女友般的亲密感。换姿势时她也相当配合,互动自然流畅。整个过程体验感非常舒适愉快。 优点缺点:身材凹凸有致,人漂亮,服务用心 推荐程度:10/满分10.0分;(综合硬件(脸,熊,身材)和软件(服务,态度)等方面打分。自己更看重哪方面,给出…
❤3👍3💯1🔥1
天气好不好 你好不好❤️
👍3🥰2
出击报告:https://t.me/sz3661 验证留名:牛肉面 上课时间:7.23 老师花名:#悦静 位置坐标:#龙岗 上课花费:800p 颜值身材:身材高挑,人照基本一致,嫩妹 服务内容:课表一致,真实 出击体验:遥控上楼,一看老师颜值不错,嫩妹来的,大眼睛,水灵生动,可爱,爽快交水费,老师热情,主动拿拖鞋,帮忙脱衣服,陪浴,让人感觉很温馨。自然爽朗,不机车,不冷漠。洗完了到床上,口活一流,服务态度极好,非常配合,互动感极强,各种服务主动,服务质量一流,舌吻,舔蛋蛋,配合听话。完了带套进去,涩涩,紧致,水润,女上有力且持久,不一会是我受不了了,速度换姿势,老师爽快积极配合,123发射。 作为嫩妹能做到这样可以说是完美了,情绪价值到位,人也好看,性价比高,服务质量一流,可冲! 优点缺点:嫩妹,漂亮服务多,热情,健谈,态度好,配合积极,情绪价值高,性价比高, 推荐程度:十分推荐 联系方式:@yuejing18
❤3👍2🥰2🔥1
你不想我吗 我的可爱 我的依赖 我的撒娇 你都忘了了吗 😷
👍3🥰2
来蹭饭了😘
👍3❤2🥰2
出击报告 (https://t.me/snmnmcvx16811) 验证留名:滴滴巴巴 验证时间:7.14 老师花名:#悦静 城市坐标:#深圳 #龙岗 上课花费:800p 颜值身材:曲线非常优美,胸部丰满而腰肢纤细,整体比例匀称动人 服务内容:课表有的都有 出击体验:老师的身材曲线非常优美,胸部丰满而腰肢纤细,整体比例匀称动人。沐浴之后,我们相拥入怀,从轻柔的亲吻开始,逐渐探索彼此的身体。亲密接触中,我们沉浸在温暖而湿润的触感里,互动充满默契与投入。在充分的前戏与交融后,我们尝试了不同的姿势,最终在激烈的节奏中共同达到了高潮。 优点缺点:老师值超级好看,身材真好,🐻大 推荐程度:10/满分10.0分;(综合硬件(脸,熊,身材)和软件(服务,态度)等方面打分。自己更看重哪方面,给出打出这个分数的理由) 联系方式:@yuejing18 (提交报告需要提供相关资料,如聊天记录,付款记录等)
❤2👍2🥰2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @yuejing16. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,421,715 of 1,629,497 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深圳龙岗悦静🍓新人开课” (@yuejing16), 4,424 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yuejing16.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.