Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 深圳外围互助【总群】出击报告

Channel

深圳外围互助【总群】出击报告

@snmnmcvx16811

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,342subscribers

+2,253 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001805379434
TypeChannel
Username@snmnmcvx16811
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/snmnmcvx16811

Growth

5,0897,3426,215.514 August 2026 — 5,089 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,089 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,091 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,104 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,152 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,252 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,300 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,318 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,316 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,342 subscribers14 August 20268 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 25 days, net +2,253. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,751–7,680 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 11:557,342+26
2 Sept 2026, 19:397,316-2
30 Aug 2026, 19:577,318+18
27 Aug 2026, 16:467,300+48
25 Aug 2026, 00:327,252+100
21 Aug 2026, 04:547,152+48
18 Aug 2026, 15:337,104+13
15 Aug 2026, 12:587,091+2,002
14 Aug 2026, 05:305,089no change
14 Aug 2026, 05:195,089first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.25%
avg views ÷ 7,342 subscribers
Avg views / post
239
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held29 (4 August 202619 August 2026)
Views total2,865
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
457.1%
👍228.6%
🥰114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC81 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026

出击报告 (https://t.me/snmnmcvx16811) 验证留名:WUBeier 验证时间:8.19 老师花名:#妙妙 城市坐标:#深圳 #龙华 上课花费:800p 颜值身材:高颜值,大长腿,特妩媚 服务内容:服务课表都做 出击体验:刚来的时候,有点紧张,抱着试一试的态度出击,没想到偶遇良师,看到老师的第一眼就知道没来错,两个大灯呼之欲出,看的很爽,正常脱衣洗澡,然后开始正面服务,提出要求,先蛇了一会,老师果断配合,然后品尝大奶,美滋滋,吃到爽,边吃边摸下面,老师下面水很多,这个细节值得夸奖,老师提出帮她爽一下,果断主攻下路,先扣一会,引起老师性欲,老师说摸阴蒂最有感觉,第一次碰到这么主动这么骚的,一顿操作,老师喘叫连连,拿纸擦了一下,然后开始品鲍,没有异味,把老师舔高潮了,一直叫老公,紧紧抱住我,浑身发抖,把我手都抓出了印子,后面开始口,没想到重头戏在这里,不喊停一直口,口的很仔细,包裹感也还舒服,很淫荡的口,口水

1

19 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC98 viewsread 20 August 2026

出击报告 (https://t.me/snmnmcvx16811) 验证留名:大圣 验证时间:8.19 老师花名:#雅萱 城市坐标:#深圳 #龙岗 上课花费:700p 颜值身材:高颜值,皮肤白嫩,胸大 服务内容:课表都有 出击体验:今天难得有空、专为雅萱出击,前几天看到频道就加购了,看到师兄的报告更加心急如焚,必须安排①波出击!见到真人确实没有失望,笑容很甜,老师人照合一,看的热血沸腾。摸摸抱抱洗白白,直接进入正题,我把老师搂在怀里,一手摸她🐻,一手抚摸着她卖力给我口的脸颊,别提多舒服了。老师口活也是不得了,三两下就让我欲罢不能,弄得我差点提前交货,赶紧挺住,又让老师直接女上,摇一摇。然后我先是后入,雅萱老师的屁股挺有弹性,每一次插入都很爽,操起来不费劲,老师叫的也很好听,现在臣服于我,想想就爽,后面我们换了三个姿势,全程不催,很满意的一次出击。还会再约 优点缺点:服务多又好,皮肤白,奶子大,细枝结硕果 推荐程度:10/满分10

19 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC70 viewsread 20 August 2026

出击报告 (https://t.me/snmnmcvx16811) 验证留名:霸王枪 验证时间:8.19 老师花名:#小琳 城市坐标:#深圳 #南山 上课花费:800p 颜值身材:嫩妹,大胸,漂亮 服务内容:课表内容 出击体验:到达科室老师指引上楼,老师非常用心,非常健谈,体验真是让人心情大好!感觉特别放松,老师人超好特别漂亮,特别健谈不会冷场,一上来就把气氛搞得热热闹闹的。一起洗个澡,老师口活特别顶爽歪歪哦。感觉更亲近了。上了床,嘿嘿,先是来点小情调,然后就进入主题啦!技巧真是没话说,差点就让我缴械投降了。等到我准备好的时候,直接就进去了。那种被紧紧包裹的感觉,简直太棒了!换成女上位的姿势,哇哦,可以直接欣赏到小琳的身材,真是太养眼了!然后我们又换回正常体位,抱着的时候,能真切感受到她的丰满,那种感觉,简直让人欲罢不能!最后,当然是全力冲刺,完美发射!总之,这次体验真是棒极了,让人回味无穷! 优点缺点:嫩妹,水多紧致,服务好,

19 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC64 viewsread 20 August 2026

出击报告 (https://t.me/snmnmcvx16811) 验证留名:蝎子王 验证时间:8.19 老师花名:#甜馨 城市坐标:#深圳 #福田 上课花费:800p 颜值身材:人照一致 皮肤手感嫩滑 服务内容:课表 出击体验:地方好找,跟随老师指引顺利见到。推门便看到一身嫩妹穿搭的甜馨老师,有一说一,老师五官精致,妆容十分靓丽,颜值不错属于耐看型。身高一米六几左右,身材性感的同时还有一双大白兔,腿笔直细长。付费洗澡,老师服务意识好,主动陪洗和擦身上。上床服务,指划,胸推,舔胸,技术熟练。口技了得,还会舔蛋和深喉,舌吻。戴套进入,比较湿润,紧度刚刚好,女上体力一般,比较放得开。换位传教士,全程控制好节奏,老师的嫩穴刚好对我的硬棒,有点儿爽感,但又没有射的冲动,反到是老师觉得太硬顶着她的下面很舒服,几个回合后换做后入式,不得不说老师这个身材是真的爱了,后入的感觉像是君临天下,一览老师性感的身材,节奏一深一浅,感受着老师的喘气和

19 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC55 viewsread 20 August 2026

出击报告 (https://t.me/snmnmcvx16811) 验证留名:梦回大唐 验证时间:8.19 老师花名:#小玉 城市坐标:#深圳 #宝安 上课花费:800p 颜值身材:无科技A4腰,蜜桃臀,大胸 服务内容:菜单都有 出击体验:今天是回锅这个妹子,非常准时,到点指挥上楼,开门见到妹子比原来更白了,颜值还是那么好看,五官精致,外围品质,身材还是那么巴适,细腰肥臀,大胸。态度还是那么热情,多了一分温存,多了一分熟悉气息,闲聊几句,付费鸳鸯浴,洗得还是那么认真,一丝不苟,前后上下洗得干干净净,洗完还是帮忙擦干全身每一处,还是那么温馨,上床开始服务,鸡鸡已经坚挺,美丽的面容怎能不勾起男人的欲望,服务已经是多余,亲完咪咪直接开始舔批,舔起安逸,痘痘还是那么饱满,阴唇还是那么香甜,口感极佳,毫无异味,炫了起码十分钟,炫得妹子逼水四溢,时间差不多了,舌头已经舔麻了,戴套传教士,今天是头炮,简直没想到,那么久不见,妹子的批会这么紧,

19 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC89 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026

出击报告 (https://t.me/snmnmcvx16811) 验证留名:小火 验证时间:8.19 老师花名:#芷涵 城市坐标:#深圳 #光明 上课花费:700p 颜值身材:长腿妹妹 服务内容:课表都做 出击体验:今天约了老师。遥控上门,见到本人长的五官精致漂亮、身材好,凹凸有序,笑容热情,态度温和,是我喜欢类型。开始我们的火热战场,老师脱光显得身材挺好,胸很漂亮,皮肤光滑细腻,在我身体不停的服帖呻淫,水中萧...小老二立马受不住,老师很配合...抱着、坐着、摆了几个姿势,随时抱起放下...高难度动作变的轻盈自然,一个字'爽'。休息片刻后,闲聊...性格开朗,很健谈。老师主动挑选战衣,丝袜...看到那身材穿上衣服更加火辣,一阵狂野涌上心头,今天要好好满足一下老师,干的她不要不要的。老师添咪咪.含蛋蛋.,忍不住摸了老师下面早已经小流成河,带上雨伞开始观音坐莲,摆了几个高难度动作后,最后还是传统的老汉推车结束战场。快乐时光总是过

👍1

18 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTC131 viewsread 20 August 2026

出击报告 (https://t.me/snmnmcvx16811) 验证留名:瓜子皮 验证时间:8.18 老师花名:#雨琪 城市坐标:#深圳 #光明 上课花费:700p 颜值身材:皮肤质感白白嫩嫩,长相非常漂亮,身材前凸后翘 服务内容:接吻、共浴、女上、女下、后入 出击体验:长得是真漂亮,小翘嘴,白皙、紧致的皮肤,刚开始还担心,会不会是死妈脸、躺尸型,但看了又看,确实很漂亮,又干净🌞又纯又欲,实际上,又纯又欲,欲的是脸蛋、纯的是性格,看起来像小猫咪、做起来像小奶狗。真是长得又漂亮,情绪价值又高。 之前约要么没位置,要么下午三点这种中暑的时间,我一向不喜欢凑热闹,就一直没约,总算约个饭点后的位置。位置也很好找,科室也很干净。推开门一看,就像公司新来实习的前台,脸上一直都是礼貌又温柔的笑。我把她脱光了从后面抱着她,站在房间里的落地镜前面,一只手揉捏着馒头,一只手揉捏着屁股,看着镜子里的鲍鱼已经湿透了,头蹭在我怀里,哼哼唧唧。顶不住。

18 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC84 viewsread 20 August 2026

出击报告 (https://t.me/snmnmcvx16811) 验证留名:罗辉耀 验证时间:8.18 老师花名:#诗茵 城市坐标:#深圳 #福田 上课花费:800p 颜值身材:小个子身材比例好 服务内容:课表都座 出击体验:我想了很久如何去描述这一刻钟,主要是一切的一切都很梦幻,从躺到床上,我就感受到姐姐柔情蜜意般但又灼热的视线,我害羞的撇过眼神,尽量不跟她对视,她的身材很好,腰肢细长,胸软软粉粉,屁股也是又大又软,我害羞到脸热热的 耳朵红红的。幻梦一刻,春宵不止,我完全不明白,为什么我在她面前什么都动不了,她柔情的双眸里仿佛迸射着爱心,好恐怖啊,呜呜呜,我感觉我被魅惑了。实在不知道怎么办了,我真的非常享受。而且她的私处也很多水,抽查几下就已经是汪水一潭了,让我从头到尾都心跳加速,我已经不知道怎么形容这段经历,我感觉我就是待宰的羔羊,在她面前啥都做不了,等着挨搞就好了。呜呜呜姐姐之力太猛 优点缺点:人美逼紧 水多活好 反馈很

18 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC138 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

出击报告 (https://t.me/snmnmcvx16811) 验证留名:Kissue 验证时间:8.18 老师花名:#晓晓 城市坐标:#深圳 #宝安 上课花费:800p 颜值身材:高颜值我喜欢的 服务内容:课表都做 出击体验:一进门就被老师的颜值和笑脸感化了 ,人照一致个人感觉比照片更好看,很温柔,于是我交了课费,一起去浴室洗澡,迫不及待了有点,洗完安排老师穿好制服和丝袜, 上来就是调情开始 说了两句骚话,开始亲胸 吹萧 老师的吹工很好 会一起含住我的二弟深候 旋转 舒服惨了 带上套套直接开干,先来了女上位 很会摇摆 身材很好 奶子也很挺 养眼 然后我说换我来草你 老师全程很配合 随意认我调摆 屁股很翘 皮肤也很白 持续8分钟 搞的老师哇哇叫 于是我也交了枪 不错的体验 优点缺点:粉粉嫩嫩 反馈很足 水多活好 很不错 推荐程度:10/满分10.0分;(综合硬件(脸,熊,身材)和软件(服务,态度)等方面打分。自己更看重

👍1🥰1

12 Aug 2026, 18:57 UTC672 viewsread 20 August 2026

出击报告 (https://t.me/snmnmcvx16811) 验证留名:anonym 验证时间:8.12 老师花名:#小小 城市坐标:#深圳 #宝安 上课花费:800p 颜值身材:身材皮肤都挺不错,奶子挺 屁股大👍 服务内容:服务非常不错 出击体验:见面后印象不错,本人和照片一样,身材很匀称,大胸细腰腿型也好看。进门后她全程很主动,先是洗澡陪浴,态度特别亲切自然。到了床上她切换得很快,轻声细语带着点小调情,动作很流畅。69的时候舌技特别舒服,骑乘位体验极佳,整个人都感觉被包裹得很紧,节奏也控制得刚刚好。后面换了几个姿势,她会根据我的反应慢慢调整,服务很专业,也不让人觉得有压力。最满意的是全程不用自己动手,她把控得很好,从服务到结尾的聊天都很有耐心,感觉物超所值。 优点缺点:🐻大,服务态度好,穴紧,姿势配合 推荐程度:10/满分10.0分;(综合硬件(脸,熊,身材)和软件(服务,态度)等方面打分。自己更看重哪方面,给出打出这

12 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC709 viewsread 20 August 2026

出击报告 (https://t.me/snmnmcvx16811) 验证留名:遨游 验证时间:8.12 老师花名:#佳妮 城市坐标:#深圳 #罗湖 上课花费:800p 颜值身材:容貌很美,身材很棒 服务内容:课表服务 出击体验:定好时间以后到达指定地点,消息引导报房号上楼,安全性很好。老师成熟的气质非常好,十分热情的接待。个子高挑苗条,皮肤细嫩白皙,很是不错。上来就是一个大拥抱,接着🐍,舌吻感觉很好,二弟瞬间就抬头表示尊重,赶紧洗澡 陪浴很不错,还有水中萧,不错很舒服。回到床上开始服务,服务做的都非常好,口活很棒69可品,边接受服务边和老师聊天,技术没得说,小穴非常紧致润滑,换两个姿势配合度非常高,基本全动。情到深处,直接出货了!结束后擦洗一番抱一抱,很有女友感,情绪价值提供的很足。因为我还有事就先走了,老师送到门口,拥抱告别。总体来说是非常不错的一次体验,很有代入感。 优点缺点:服务到位,情绪价值提供的十分充足 推荐程度:10

12 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC674 viewsread 20 August 2026

出击报告 (https://t.me/snmnmcvx16811) 验证留名:蓝猫 验证时间:8.12 老师花名:#悦静 城市坐标:#深圳 #龙岗 上课花费:800p 颜值身材:脸挺好看,气质温柔。乳头粉嫩,胸部手感软软的,整体身材看着舒服,比例也不错。 服务内容:见课表 出击体验:照片是本人,像邻居家的小妹儿,人很随和,性格好,配合度高,胸型饱满,手感极佳,皮肤爽滑,做起来比较放松,气氛比较舒畅松弛。她身体敏感,水出得挺多,反应也很真实,没有故意装的感觉。因为太舒服了,全程几乎没换姿势,我很快就完了。她也没有表现出不耐烦,还是很温柔地配合。整体氛围轻松,身体和心情都挺满足的,是一次舒服的体验,值得再返。 优点缺点:颜值、身材、服务态度都在线,没什么明显短板。人好看,态度也好,整体挺满意的 推荐程度:10/满分10.0分;(综合硬件(脸,熊,身材)和软件(服务,态度)等方面打分。自己更看重哪方面,给出打出这个分数的理由) 联系方

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @snmnmcvx16811. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“深圳外围互助【总群】出击报告” (@snmnmcvx16811), 7,342 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/snmnmcvx16811.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.