Giveaways & airdrops β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
51 measurements spanning 82 days, net -576. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 12,961β13,712 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 51
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Oct 2026, 04:18
13,048
-2
28 Oct 2026, 01:46
13,050
+1
27 Oct 2026, 03:26
13,049
-4
26 Oct 2026, 06:49
13,053
+2
25 Oct 2026, 04:09
13,051
+1
24 Oct 2026, 03:47
13,050
-2
22 Oct 2026, 06:01
13,052
+3
21 Oct 2026, 02:59
13,049
-10
20 Oct 2026, 01:37
13,059
-8
19 Oct 2026, 04:39
13,067
-5
18 Oct 2026, 07:20
13,072
-7
17 Oct 2026, 05:47
13,079
-3
16 Oct 2026, 05:57
13,082
-14
15 Oct 2026, 03:50
13,096
-10
14 Oct 2026, 01:11
13,106
-15
11 Oct 2026, 08:00
13,121
+15
7 Oct 2026, 03:56
13,106
-62
2 Oct 2026, 09:19
13,168
-116
18 Sept 2026, 12:17
13,284
-21
16 Sept 2026, 01:59
13,305
first reading
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 33 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
28s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
816 reactions across 28 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
π
362
44.4%
β€
189
23.2%
π
131
16.1%
π€
35
4.29%
π€―
32
3.92%
π₯
28
3.43%
π±
23
2.82%
π
4
0.49%
π€
4
0.49%
β€βπ₯
2
0.245%
π
2
0.245%
π₯°
2
0.245%
π
1
0.123%
π
1
0.123%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 816 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 30 we hold a reading for Β· 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @ytghonisky. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
3.03%
1 of 33 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid Β· 1 distinct token
Median views Β· ads
6,310
over 1 measured post
Median views Β· rest
4,420
over 29 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ»Π°ΠΌΠ° / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides β nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means βthe share of posts that declared themselvesβ, never βthe share of posts that were paid forβ. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like βads get x% fewer viewsβ β an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
20260720101214853715010300166413688398407
1
19 July 2026
19 July 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry β we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
MA'AF TELAT NGASIH INFO NIH BANG.
Denger2 dah pada WD di garapan mining ATF di telegram. Yang mau ikutan garap, bisa langsung di gaspol yak! Gratisan kok.
1. Daftar dulu disini klik https://t.me/ATF_AIRDROP_bot?start=302279504
2. Tap tombol connect, pilih walletnya pakai Tonkeeper (biar gampang akses ke stonfi dan swapnya)
3. Tap Profile, lakukan verifikasi agar bisa WD
4. Tap menu Mine untuk mulai mining, dah bs dβ¦
Reminder buat yg muslim, khususnya yg hari ini banyak sekali ujiannya, yg sabar yah, dan tetap pasrahkan semuanya kepada Allah SWT ππ
Sebelum istirahat, pastikan sdh ambil wudhu dl yah, biar lebih tenang. Insha Allah besok ada solusinya.
Lagi rame BiliBili nih, bakal nyaingi Youtube, katanya sih per 1K views dptnya $0.7 atau sekitar Rp12.400an.
Ini SS contoh akun BiliBili saya, diakun ini saya cuma upload musik yah, bikinnya pake Suno, editnya pake capcut. Ini baru level 2, denger2 mulai dapat komisi klo dah di level 3 keatas.
Gass bang!
1. Install BiliBili disini
2. Install Suno disini dpt 250 credit bisa buat 10 lagu gratis!
3. Bikin liriknya paβ¦
Reminder! Tadi malam saat live streaming sudah saya kasih insight disebuah project yg bs menghasilkan 1.4 M setahun yah. Segera di eksekusi aja bang. Ni saya juga mulai garap kok. Semangat! π₯π₯π₯
Karena td ada yg menanyakan garapan honeygain x jumptask, ini sy share untuk WD nya masih lancar yah, cuma gak jd token JMPT, langsung jd BNB krn sy pilih nya BNB. πβοΈ
Insha Allah malam ini saya live di telegram ya, jika ada pertanyaan bisa ditanyakan nanti malam secara live biar lebih jelas oke, bang. βοΈπππ»
Halo bang, sudah saya rilis panduan WD dari scalev ke BCA yah. Bisa lihat disini https://youtu.be/VW4GM4I3l9I
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @ytghonisky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ytghonisky edited 1 post after it first published β the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
31 August 2026
Most recent edit
31 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βYT GHONISKY π₯³β (@ytghonisky), 13,048 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ytghonisky.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.