Photo, posted without a caption
🕊7❤🔥3custom 52984951879185474163custom 52988727713784384473💔1custom 53278094564052433091

Channel
@yovvgen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
83subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002799886575 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yovvgen |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yovvgen |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:09 | 83 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 82 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 12 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
519 reactions across 17 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 152 | 29.3% | |
| custom 5368471457984696067 | 71 | 13.7% | |
| custom 5233261979086374134 | 57 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5242667570917573316 | 57 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5298972290065656973 | 23 | 4.43% | |
| custom 5201662405746129354 | 18 | 3.47% | |
| 💘 | 17 | 3.28% | |
| custom 5265030739778369074 | 16 | 3.08% | |
| custom 5298495187918547416 | 16 | 3.08% | |
| custom 5192722431319507775 | 15 | 2.89% | |
| 🍓 | 13 | 2.50% | |
| ⚡ | 11 | 2.12% | |
| custom 5235520045257359819 | 9 | 1.73% | |
| 🕊 | 9 | 1.73% | |
| custom 5298872771378438447 | 8 | 1.54% | |
| custom 5343629839591040773 | 8 | 1.54% | |
| custom 5265018267193338551 | 7 | 1.35% | |
| custom 5285111459938852435 | 7 | 1.35% | |
| custom 5325860288577168587 | 2 | 0.385% | |
| custom 5327809456405243309 | 2 | 0.385% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.193% |
Custom emoji. 15 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 519reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yovvgen. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 January 2026 to 12 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Photo, posted without a caption
🕊7❤🔥3custom 52984951879185474163custom 52988727713784384473💔1custom 53278094564052433091
тотально лень рисовать 👩💻
custom 526503073977836907415custom 529849518791854741610❤🔥8🍓2custom 52650182671933385511custom 53258602885771685871
🚬
❤🔥14custom 52650182671933385515custom 52988727713784384475🍓1custom 52650307397783690741custom 53258602885771685871custom 53278094564052433091
Photo, posted without a caption
❤🔥11custom 53684714579846960674💘3custom 52984951879185474163🕊1custom 51927224313195077751custom 52650182671933385511custom 52989722900656569731
🌟
custom 536847145798469606713custom 52355200452573598197❤🔥6💘3custom 51927224313195077752🍓1🕊1
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52989722900656569738custom 53684714579846960678custom 52851114599388524355❤🔥3⚡2🍓1custom 51927224313195077751
я решила впервые поучаствовать в конкурсе🌟 а ещё я создала щпп, надеюсь, я буду туда что-нибудь постить 🌟🌟 https://t.me/+fH7G7Xf6kUI2MWEy
❤🔥12custom 52989722900656569736custom 52426675709175733165custom 52851114599388524352custom 53684714579846960672
🕺
custom 536847145798469606715custom 52426675709175733169custom 52989722900656569738❤🔥3🍓1💘1
😇💪
❤🔥25custom 519272243131950777511custom 52426675709175733168⚡2🍓1custom 52355200452573598191
я снова скачала сгм спустя тысячи лет
❤🔥14custom 52016624057461293547⚡3custom 52426675709175733162custom 53436298395910407731
😁
custom 536847145798469606714❤🔥8custom 52332619790863741347custom 53436298395910407733💘1custom 52355200452573598191custom 52426675709175733161
бобуксы
custom 524266757091757331622❤🔥9custom 52016624057461293545custom 53684714579846960672⚡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @yovvgen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,272,498 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЁИчес” (@yovvgen), 83 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yovvgen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.