Channel
@youtubermonies
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,862subscribers
+127 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002171025091 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @youtubermonies |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/youtubermonies |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:55 | 1,862 | +51 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:51 | 1,811 | +75 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 1,736 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 1,735 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (9 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,877 |
| Reactions total | 350 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
509 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 354 | 69.5% | |
| ❤ | 129 | 25.3% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 4.91% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.196% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 509reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мой канал c нишей на США 55+ вырос пятикратно спустя всего 4 дня! Вы набрали даже больше 80-ти огоньков и я продолжаю делиться результатами и открытиями с ведения faceless контента на взрослую аудиторию. Канал вырос в 5 раз за эти дни, уже 1-го августа я добил все показатели для монеты (1000пдп и 4к часов). Жду когда они обновятся и подаю заявку! Мои выводы на данный момент: 1) я подтвердил, что тема канала - акт…
🔥44❤10👍2
И это только начало... Около двух недель назад я писал о том, что активно изучаю и пробую делать взрослый контент. Сейчас нетерпиться поделиться первыми успехами. Внимание на скрины. Контент - документальные фильмы. Аудитория на роликах - пенсионеры США (что может быть лучше?) Среднее удержание сейчас - 7 минут на ролике. Предварительный RPM: 9-10$ Что самое главное я отмечу: 1) Обратите внимание на стабильност…
🔥89❤8👍4
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥17❤10
100.775 долларов с канала на миллион подписчиков! Я показал канал, всю статистику, а также дал очень много информации про анимационный контент из личного опыта в моём новом ролике на ютубе. ПЕРЕХОДИ И СМОТРИ А еще в конце показал актуальную нишу для анимационного и геймплей контента 🤫 Покажите реакцию огоньками и я продолжу показывать доходные каналы и рассказывать инфу про них!
🔥34❤8
Хочу вернуть на ютуб формат, который давно хотел попробовать 👀 Буду разбирать разные доходные каналы - показывать их статистику, объяснять, как устроена команда, производство контента, сколько это стоит и почему эти каналы стреляют. Вам было бы интересно смотреть такие обзоры? Если да - давайте наберем 85 огоньков под этим постом и я уже сегодня сажусь записывать обзор на канал с общим доходом в 100.000длр 🔥
🔥112❤12
Кстати, так раз недавно расширил сетку анимационных каналов. Показываю первый результат. Эта ниша старая и давно всеми забытая. Но даже спустя годы - просмотры у каналов очень стабильные, а при правильной подаче новые каналы легко взлетают (мой стрельнул после второго видео). Рост полностью органический, а канал сразу с создания подключен к CMS. Что мне нравится в этом направлении - низкая себестоимость. Минута ан…
❤17🔥6👍2
Хочется запереться на вилле вместе с командой на пару месяцев, сделать топовые результаты по взрослым нишам, кратно увеличить количество анимационных подростковых каналов и других источников дохода.. Столько всего нужно сделать, вы бы знали. Если брать в счет всех людей, которые работают над всеми каналами у меня, то получится более 20 человек.. Полностью вся работа сейчас направленна именно на долгосрочные проекты,…
❤20👍9🔥7
Ежегодно я пишу свои итоги и цели. Листая заметки, наткнулся на запись от 30 декабря 2021 года. На тот момент мне было 14 лет. В то время я вёл канал на СНГ-аудиторию про новости из жизни актеров. Тогда я нашёл монтажера с оплатой 150р за видео и девушку, которая мне озвучивала ролики по 10р за минуту 😅 Мой контент смотрели в основном пенсионеры, RPM был около 100 рублей. Пиковый доход я заработал перед Новым годом…
❤29🔥10👎1
Это так прикольно спонтанно перемещаться по миру) Я в Турции уже сейчас, днём тут сильная жара, так что я работаю и пишу этот пост. Вижу сколько ниш и возможностей впереди в этом году. Халявщики и ленивые ребята уже не делают что либо с того момента, когда простой ии шлак перестал монетизироваться этой весной. А вот анимационные каналы, faceless каналы на взрослую аудиторию и авторские проекты бьют рекорды у многих…
🔥35❤15👍8
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @youtubermonies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 116,344 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“YouTuber Money | Alex Pimenov ⚖️” (@youtubermonies), 1,862 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/youtubermonies.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.