Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 7 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 64.2%
- avg views ÷ 1,265 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 813
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 5.79%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 54
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 31
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 43m 55s
- Average length
- 21m 58s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
847 reactions across 18 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 847 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 18
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 8
- of 18 we hold a reading for · 44%
- Most on one post
- 5
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @youtubelogovo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 September 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
26 Sept 2026, 09:45 UTC428 views31 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026 Photo
🔥АВТОМАТИЗАЦИЯ РАБОТЫ🔥
Мне тут внезапно для работы понадобилось делать шортсы в большом кол-ве и я подумал, а почему бы мне не написать программу, чтобы она это делала за меня?
Итог - за 4 часа вайбкодинга написана программа, куда ты грузишь ролик длинного формата, он транкрибируется, клод сам выбирает лучшие куски для шортс, оценивает его вирусность, хук, смысл, финал итд , сортирует по общей оценке, сам нарезает,…
❤16🔥13🗿2
25 Sept 2026, 14:49 UTC502 views83 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026 🔥 ПОЧЕМУ ОБЛОЖКА И НАЗВАНИЕ ЭТО НЕ КОНЕЦ УПАКОВКИ? 🔥
Сегодня поговорим о казалось бы очень понятной теме , однако почему то многие о этом не думают
Все мы знаем цепочку:
Обложка➡️Название ➡️Клик
Эдакая цепочка управления взглядом которая приводит к просмотру, но почему никто не говорит о продолжении цепи , но уже после Клика?
Вот мы сделали умопомрачительную обложку, человек заинтересовался, прочитал название, его…
🤡74👍6❤3
24 Sept 2026, 18:27 UTC582 views37 reactionsread 27 September 2026 Video
А вот и запись эфира, смотрите кто не успел :)
Вступайте в чат, там общаемся и отвечаю на вопросы
https://t.me/+4Zbvd_ULnWBjOGVi
🔥32❤4⚡1
24 Sept 2026, 17:10 UTC596 views45 reactionsread 27 September 2026 Пока мы ждем запись эфира, чтобы могли посмотреть все те кому интересно, я тут подумал, а может и свой эфир периодически подрубать с ответами на вопросы? 😏
На Эфире у Дани в чате вопросов была тьма, но времени на них ответить не было, вот и возникла такая мысль. Пишите что думаете ⬇️
🔥44❤1
23 Sept 2026, 14:02 UTC659 views20 reactionsread 27 September 2026 Напоминаю, уже через пару часов, в 19.00 по Мск можно будет увидеть меня на эфире у Дани Metagame :) А также задать свои вопросы в чате.
Мы в гостях, вести себя прилично!)
https://danielyotube.ru/pl/webinar/show?id=3229631
❤17🤡3
22 Sept 2026, 17:40 UTC731 views29 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026 Video
🔥 КОМБАЙН ДЛЯ ПРОИЗВОДСТВА ВИДЕО — ОТ ТЕКСТА ДО ГОТОВОГО РОЛИКА🔥
Мой друг и боевой товарищ несколько месяцев разрабатывает собственный софт, который объединяет практически весь цикл производства ролика со всевозможным функционалом, ниже кратко о функционале, но не о всем, все сюда уместить сложно))
Главное — почти все функции могут работать в едином автоматическом цикле, но начать можно с любого этапа.
⚙️ ЧТО УМЕЕ…
🔥21❤4👍3🥰1
21 Sept 2026, 13:18 UTC620 views42 reactionsread 27 September 2026 Photo
ВЫПУСКАЙТЕ КРАКЕНА
знакомьтесь - Влад, один из самых жестких кейсов приватки, он будет приглашённым гостем на эфире разборов в среду в 17:00 мск
За две недели, с 1 по 17 сентября, он заработал 6000$ со своей сетки каналов. Скрины выше 👆
он работает режиссёром монтажа и моушн-дизайнером. YouTube он ведёт, совмещая с основной работой
Повторюсь: ПАРАЛЛЕЛЬНО основной работе, в свободное время
как вы поняли, в среду …
🔥32❤7🥰3
21 Sept 2026, 13:18 UTC698 views13 reactionsread 27 September 2026 В среду, в 19.00 по МСК можно будет меня увидеть на эфире у Дани, почти все из вас наверняка его знают, сам лично начинал с его приватки, там же можно будет задать свои вопросы мне и ему
❤11🔥2
20 Sept 2026, 12:28 UTC848 views39 reactionsread 27 September 2026 Photo
🔥ФАКТЧЕКИНГ О СЕБЕ И ДЕНЬГАХ🔥
🐣НЕМНОГО О СЕБЕ ДЛЯ НОВЕНЬКИХ И СТАРЕНЬКИХ:🐣
✅ 8 каналов на монетизации ПРЯМО СЕЙЧАС, все на Европейских языках (не говоря уже о потерянных, демонетнутых, удаленных, каналах с забаненным адиком итд 😄)
Профильно - Испания
✅ Занимаюсь ютубом с Ноября месяца, согласен, не так много как хотелось бы, однако благодаря своему дикому желанию разобраться, знаю очень много тонкостей о сфере, ла…
❤18🔥16🤝5
19 Sept 2026, 15:17 UTC858 views39 reactions5 Starsread 27 September 2026 🔥ТЫ НЕ ИЩЕШЬ НИШУ. ТЫ ИЩЕШЬ ГАРАНТИЮ, ЧТО НЕ ПРОСРЁШЬ СВОЁ ВРЕМЯ🔥
Так бы я назвал извечную проблему выбора и неопределенности на ютуб.
Я уже делал 2 ХОРОШИХ поста про выбор ниши:
🔥 КАК ВЫБРАТЬ НИШУ ДЛЯ YOUTUBE, ЧТОБЫ ПОТОМ НЕ СТРАДАТЬ?
🔥 НАШЁЛ 5 НИШ — А КАК ПОНЯТЬ, В КАКУЮ ИЗ НИХ ЗАХОДИТЬ?
В целом информации хватает для правильного выбора, но тут я подумал и решил добавить вот что.
Ниша реально решает, в очередн…
❤18🔥16❤🔥5
18 Sept 2026, 18:01 UTC850 views63 reactionsread 27 September 2026 Те кто поставил смеющийся смайлик на розыгрыш - я вас найду 🤣
🤣50✍6❤4🫡2💩1
18 Sept 2026, 15:16 UTC948 views85 reactionsread 27 September 2026 Photo
⚠️Дарим 10 ключей Фастгена + Нонстопа и 100 000 000 символов озвучки ElevenLabs! 20 призовых мест, шансы победить ОГРОМНЫЕ:
1-5 место — месячная подписка Video Medium на FastGen
5-10 место — месячная подписка Standart на VeoNonStop
11-20 место — 10 миллионов символов Lumean.app
Условия элементарные, просто подписаться на эти каналы:
@Grisha_Youtuber_2003
@kirill_roo
@moneypassyt
@TRAFFIC_BOYS
@kiravacore
@laborat…
🤣40🔥22❤10😁6🆒4💩2🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @youtubelogovo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Youtube Логово” (@youtubelogovo), 1,265 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/youtubelogovo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.