Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TWINKY

@yourstwinky

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,641subscribers

+26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001539233310
TypeChannel
Username@yourstwinky
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yourstwinky

Growth

5,6155,6415,6286 August 2026 — 5,615 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,616 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,630 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,641 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,611–5,645 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:055,641+11
10 Aug 2026, 07:155,630+14
7 Aug 2026, 08:215,616+1
6 Aug 2026, 23:485,615first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.3%
avg views ÷ 5,641 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,280
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held13 (24 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total29,580
Reactions total1,354
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,354 reactions across 13 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
74254.8%
❤‍🔥25919.1%
🔥17512.9%
🐳523.84%
💘251.85%
181.33%
🦄130.96%
👍120.886%
🤔100.739%
😍80.591%
😨60.443%
🥰60.443%
👏40.295%
💅40.295%
30.222%
🍓30.222%
💊20.148%
🕊20.148%
😁20.148%
😭20.148%
5 further kinds60.443%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,354reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
112
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 13 we hold a reading for · 54%
Most on one post
76
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yourstwinky. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC830 views61 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Всем доброго вечерочка! Делюсь красивыми видами города Сиань🏞️ Также хочу вас предупредить, что стримов не будет до сентября, однако вы можете глянуть нарезки моих прошлых стримов на канале yellow_m19:

49🔥6❤‍🔥3😭21

10 Aug 2026, 04:57 UTC≈1,360 views102 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Всем доброго утра! Залетаю к вам с хорошей новостью: Вкусно и точка Х10 вкуснее мака в Китае.

75❤‍🔥12😨54🔥4🐳1💘1

9 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC≈1,540 views106 reactions4 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Гермиона позвала потусить в Хогсмиде 🪄🍻

79🔥14😍6❤‍🔥2😁21🐳1💘1

7 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC≈2,050 views60 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

Даа, про Пиво в ботле я не забыла. В альбоме будет 14 треков:)

🐳2916🔥6💘4🤔31❤‍🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC≈1,950 views52 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

Всем доброго утра и хорошего дня! Показываю отрывок своего любимого трека из предстоящего альбома. Надеюсь, он вам тоже понравится. *Трек будет называться "Бегущий к небесам"

36🐳8🔥4💘21❤‍🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC≈2,150 views124 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! Сегодня в Пекине температура поднялась до 38 градусов. Возможно, когда я приеду, я превращусь в плавленный сырок и начну писать треки про бутерброды.

88🔥15❤‍🔥13💘3🐳21🥰1😨1

3 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC≈2,740 views133 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет, ребят! Урааа! Я уже в Пекине. Вайб тут чудесный, люди приветливые, на улицах чисто. Я очень боялась, что в Китая я ничего не смогу есть , но как же сильно я ошибалась - такой шикарной еды я давно не ела, готовят от души, как своей семье. Одако тут очень высокая влажность, и у меня такое чувство, что я нахожусь в хамаме)

98🔥12👍8❤‍🔥6🐳322👀1

29 Jul 2026, 07:28 UTC≈2,900 views141 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥7539❤‍🔥10🤔7🐳2💊2💘21

29 Jul 2026, 07:28 UTC≈2,660 views54 reactions76 Starsread 8 August 2026

Борюсь с социофобией день 1:

40❤‍🔥4👍4👏21🍌1🐳1🕊1

29 Jul 2026, 06:53 UTC≈2,550 views121 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Всем доброго утра и хорошего дня! Я уже на финишной прямой в написании альбома:) Дроп, скорее всего, будет 21 августа, ждите 13 или даже 14 треков.

90🦄13❤‍🔥8🔥4💘3🐳21

26 Jul 2026, 14:01 UTC≈2,860 views138 reactions11 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Яна Даче Пока наслаждаюсь летом в Москве, но через недельку отправлюсь в Китай на инт! Обязательно привезу вам чай и другие приколюхи, которые разыграю в сентябре:) А как вы проводите лето? Заметили, как быстро пролетели два месяца?)

❤‍🔥9228🔥11💘3🤯21🐳1

24 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC≈3,100 views164 reactions17 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥10230🔥15💘5🍓3🥰321

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @yourstwinky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 826,715 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TWINKY” (@yourstwinky), 5,641 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yourstwinky.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.