Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for YOUR WORLD | ТВОЙ МИР

Channel

YOUR WORLD | ТВОЙ МИР

@yourrworrlld

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,014subscribers

-65 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001575797302
TypeChannel
Username@yourrworrlld
DescriptionСотрудничество — https://t.me/yourworldad По всем вопросам — @vaaallleriaaa Биржа — https://telega.in/c/yourrworrlld РКН — https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673ae12e6afad41667c4cd79&registryType=bloggersPermission
Created11 March 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yourrworrlld

Growth

15,01415,07915,046.57 August 2026 — 15,079 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,079 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,078 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,065 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,066 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,060 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,050 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,037 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,025 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,014 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net -65. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,004–15,089 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 15:3515,014-11
14 Aug 2026, 04:5615,025-12
12 Aug 2026, 18:3315,037-13
11 Aug 2026, 17:1115,050-10
10 Aug 2026, 19:1515,060-6
9 Aug 2026, 19:1115,066+1
8 Aug 2026, 16:5115,065-13
7 Aug 2026, 15:5115,078-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:4515,079no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:3515,079first reading

Engagement

61 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.54%
avg views ÷ 15,014 subscribers
Avg views / post
832
61 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
61
of 61 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 60 of 61 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held61 (7 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total50,776
Reactions total1,414
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
23,500
Videos
1,570
Links
896

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 03s
Average length
1m 03s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,414 reactions across 60 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
92465.3%
❤‍🔥1258.84%
🔥473.32%
😁302.12%
🤨261.84%
🤡251.77%
🥰241.70%
🤣221.56%
😭211.49%
🤯211.49%
👀201.41%
🥴191.34%
👍151.06%
😢140.99%
🥱120.849%
🤩90.636%
🤔70.495%
😍60.424%
🎉50.354%
🏆50.354%
13 further kinds372.62%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,414reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC438 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

СЕМЬЯ НЕ СМОГЛА МОЛЧАТЬ: разбираемся, что происходить с Дженной Ортегой. Кажется, интернет критики опять забыли, что знаменитости — это не общественный проект, который они обязаны ежедневно разбирать по косточкам. После нового интервью Дженны люди массово начали обсуждать ее внешность. Кто-то якобы «переживает за здоровье», кто-то уже ставит диагнозы по фотографиям, а кто-то просто считает своим долгом написать, чт

10❤‍🔥4💔3

15 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC645 views26 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

История о том, как Роберт Паттинсон врал, что Майкл Джексон его отец😭 Вот это я понимаю детская фантазия🤌🏼 Пока другие дети приходили в школу с безобидными историями, маленький Паттинсон решил пойти дальше и убедить всех, что он сын поп-короля! И если вы думаете, что он сказал это ради забавы, а потом «дал заднюю», то вынуждена вас разочаровать. Роберт предусмотрительно подготовил «доказательства». Он взял альбом

14🤣9😁3

15 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC580 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Когда только начинала вести канал, регулярно выкладывала посты из рубрики «Любимые видео админа». Почему перестала публиковать — не понимаю🫠 Поэтому держите новую подборку🫶🏼 Как можно заметить, гиперфикс на Майкле Джексоне так и не прошел😮‍💨

15🔥1🥰1

15 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC768 views33 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

ПОЧЕМУ ЗЕНДЕЯ ВЫГЛЯДИТ НА МИЛЛИОН, хотя на ней как будто совсем нет макияжа. Ни драматичных теней, ни килограмма тонального, ни контуринга, который можно увидеть из космоса. А лицо при этом выглядит дорого🤌🏼 Визажист актрисы не пытается сделать лицо «идеальным». Наоборот, он оставляет кожу максимально живой: тончайшее покрытие, много подготовки кожи, немного консилера там, где действительно нужно. Вместо тяжелого

26🥱3❤‍🔥2🔥1🙈1

15 Aug 2026, 05:50 UTC191 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

КАЙЛИ ДЖЕННЕР И ALO: сколько ей заплатили и почему об этом молчат. Кайли снова продает нам «естественность». На этот раз в съемке для ALO, где все выглядит так, будто она просто проснулась, сходила на пилатес и случайно оказалась идеальной в кадре💅🏼 ALO официально сделал Дженнер лицом новой кампании «Розовое маршмеллоу». Съемка — Лос-Анджелес, эстетика здоровья и любви к себе, тренировки, красивые леггинсы и очень

2🥱1

14 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC669 views29 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Тейт Макрэй решила, что просто выступить на фестивале Lollapalooza будет слишком скучно. В финале своего шоу певица устроила настоящий золотой апокалипсис. Окунуться в огромный бассейн с золотистой сценической смесью и буквально превратиться в живую золотую статую? Легко! И нет, это не обычная краска из строительного магазина😅 Для номера специально подготовили безопасную для кожи смесь и ее понадобилось сотни литр

22🤩4❤‍🔥2💅1

14 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC875 views20 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

ЕЕ НАЗЫВАЛИ ЖАДНОЙ ШЛ*Х*Й ПРОСТО ИЗ-ЗА РОМАНОВ. Кайя Гербер устала быть «девушкой, которая встречается не с теми» и наконец-то высказалась. Публичные отношения — это отдельное испытание для многих звезд. Пока общественность разглядывала ее парней, самой Кайе успели прилепить ярлыки «серийная любительница отношений», «шл*hа» и «жадная до денег». Причем сама Гербер считает подобное отношение откровенно сексистским.

15🥱3🤔1😢1

14 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC874 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

ХОТЕЛИ ПОМОЧЬ ЛЮДЯМ, но в итоге на них подали в суд. Вот это поворот👀 Селену Гомес и ее маму Мэнди Тифи обвиняют в том, что инвесторов якобы ввели в заблуждение на почти $1,2 млн. И претензия там довольно спорная. Инвесторы утверждают, что вложились в Wondermind (медиаплатформа, посвященная ментальному здоровью), рассчитывая на определенную бизнес-модель, возможности компании и участие самой Селены, а реальность ок

9😢2🤔1

14 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC739 views37 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🤑История о том, как Ирина Шейк превратила квартиру с Брэдли Купером в золотую жилу. 50,000,000 уже в кармане💅🏼 Вот это я понимаю — не продала, так заработала! Модель, похоже, нашла идеальный способ монетизировать роскошную недвижимость в Нью-Йорке. Квартиру, которую связывают с периодом ее жизни с голливудским актером, звезда сдает примерно за $30,000 в месяц. А теперь самое интересное, на аренде она уже заработа

❤‍🔥2110🔥3👍1💅1😎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @yourrworrlld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,219,441 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

vogue is my religion
@voguemr · 106,349
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
Дом Знаменитостей
@thehouseofcelebs · 101,051
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“YOUR WORLD | ТВОЙ МИР” (@yourrworrlld), 15,014 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yourrworrlld.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.