Канал о том, как зарабатывать предпринимателю больше денег с помощью ИИ
Я главный по передаче маркетинга и продаж на ИИ
Как легко сделать в своем бизнесе перелидоз и получать +1млн доп. прибыли, передав трафик и клиентов на ИИ
Связь: @Vin_Pasha
Created
Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
23 measurements spanning 87 days, net +180. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,808–6,042 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Nov 2026, 09:37
6,015
+7
30 Oct 2026, 04:00
6,008
+53
24 Oct 2026, 17:35
5,955
-3
21 Oct 2026, 09:27
5,958
-9
18 Oct 2026, 00:30
5,967
-9
14 Oct 2026, 18:08
5,976
-8
11 Oct 2026, 08:37
5,984
+7
5 Oct 2026, 01:18
5,977
+14
25 Sept 2026, 21:00
5,963
+71
13 Sept 2026, 05:41
5,892
-15
9 Sept 2026, 11:41
5,907
-13
3 Sept 2026, 20:41
5,920
-17
31 Aug 2026, 11:58
5,937
+8
28 Aug 2026, 08:24
5,929
+2
25 Aug 2026, 17:26
5,927
+9
22 Aug 2026, 20:28
5,918
+23
19 Aug 2026, 20:34
5,895
+13
16 Aug 2026, 16:45
5,882
+5
13 Aug 2026, 08:53
5,877
-1
10 Aug 2026, 14:41
5,878
first reading
Engagement
34 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.6%
avg views ÷ 6,015 subscribers
Avg views / post
637
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 34 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 October 2026
Posts held
34 (7 July 2026 – 29 October 2026)
Views total
10,197
Reactions total
146
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 13:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
391
Videos
71
Links
196
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
6m 24s
Average length
1m 36s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
353 reactions across 31 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
241
68.3%
custom 6033045457230368445
88
24.9%
😁
18
5.10%
😡
6
1.70%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 353 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 29 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 33 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yourcashtg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 29 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
И ЗНАЕТЕ, ЧТО САМОЕ ИНТЕРЕСНОЕ? GPT УЖЕ СМОТРИТ НА КЛОДА!
Вижу, вижу, что тема интересная, как и говорит чат ГПТ засматривается на клод:
Проблемы с неожиданными блокировками есть и у OpenAI.
В июне 2026 года разработчики публично жаловались на деактивации аккаунтов с подписками Pro.
А в октябре появились новые жалобы пользователей на блокировки, которые они считают ошибочными.
Есть и блокировки с 27 октября по 2…
CLAUDE ОПЯТЬ БАНИТ АККАУНТЫ. ДАЖЕ ЗА $200 В МЕСЯЦ. А Я ПОТЕРЯЛ АККАУНТ, КОТОРОМУ БЫЛО БОЛЬШЕ 2 ЛЕТ!
Ребята, Anthropic снова устроила весёлую жизнь пользователям Claude Code этой ночью)
С 28 на 29 октября пошли новые сообщения о блокировках и проверках личности. Причём сейчас люди рассказывают, что теряют аккаунты даже после подтверждения паспорта.
А самое интересное, я сам оказался в числе пострадавших, только ещё…
Меньше суток и рилс уже набрал более 200к просмотров.
1000 активаций ключевых слов (лидов)
Из которых 347 перешло дальше по воронке, забрали лидмагнит, и десятки уже написало в личку по поводу услуг.
Это видео создала полностью моя машина. От поиска идей, переписки сценария, монтажа, выкладки, настройки воронки, и общение в личке.
Кто говорил что нет ИИ которые могут трафик превратить в клиентов?
@vin_pasha пиши…
Сейчас просто все снимают про монтаж, Клод сделал видео, Клод смонтировал, Клод Клод. У меня ИИ монтирует видео с начала этого года)
Началось с того, что я искал, чем монтировать сотни роликов которые выдают мой контент-завод, машина.
Сегодня поделюсь тнструментами, которые использую:
Монтаж и рендер
- HyperFrames, рендер видео из HTML https://github.com/heygen-com/hyperframes
- FFmpeg, склейка и звук https://g…
ЧЕЛОВЕК В ЭПОХУ ПЕРЕМЕН
28 октября 2026 года в Москве состоится междисциплинарная конференция «Человек в эпоху перемен», посвящённая ценностям, отношениям, технологиям и будущему человека в меняющемся мире.
Конференция объединит более 12 экспертов из разных профессиональных областей. В центре обсуждения - внутренняя устойчивость в условиях неопределённости, семейные ценности и отношения, влияние искусственного инте…
Нейросетями пользуются все. Деньги на них зарабатывают единицы 🫰
Кто-то балуется с картинками. Кто-то просит написать пост. Кто-то прикрутил бота к каналу и считает, что автоматизировал бизнес
Это всё игрушки
Я 13 лет в маркетинге и уже почти 4 года в разработке на ИИ, больше ста проектов за спиной. И вывод у меня простой: вопрос не в том, умеешь ли ты пользоваться нейросетями. Вопрос - где конкретно в твоём деле …
Мне нужен ваш взгляд со стороны ❤️
Некоторое время назад, я практически две недели делился здесь своими мыслями, своей историей, переживаниями и тем, что происходило у меня внутри.
Кто-то знает меня много лет, а кто-то познакомился со мной только через эти посты.
Сейчас я пытаюсь понять, в чём моя настоящая ценность для других людей и как превратить то, чем я искренне горю (а такое увлечение я кажется нашел), в де…
Окей, те кто голосовал «удочка», жду вас в ЛС @Vin_Pasha напишите туда - Удочка.
Я готов показать всего 10 людям настоящую money машину с ИИ.
Но про рыбку на созвоне не спрашивайте🤭 сразу закончим созвон! Если поймете что удочка реальная и работает, расскажу условие покупки этой программы агентов❤️
МЕТА И GOOGLE УСТРОИЛИ НАСТОЯЩУЮ МЯСОРУБКУ В ИИ!
Пока все обсуждают, какая нейросеть лучше пишет тексты и код, сразу два технологических гиганта выкатили модели нового уровня. (оставляя Opus и GPT позади)
Meta - Muse Wonder и Muse Wonder Full.*
Google - Gemini 4 Argon.
И вот тут реально интересно, потому что обе компании делают ставку уже не просто на умные ответы, а на ИИ, который способен самостоятельно выполня…
Кто знает где ФРЕД?
Как у вас стартанула рабочая неделя?
Друзья, не забывайте включать свои мозги в решениях задач, а то будет как в видео выше😂
😁9🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @yourcashtg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Паша Вин про ИИ | Фабрика Денег” (@yourcashtg), 6,015 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yourcashtg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.