Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Паша Вин про ИИ | Фабрика Денег

Channel

Паша Вин про ИИ | Фабрика Денег

@yourcashtg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,929subscribers

+94 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001910742799
TypeChannel
Username@yourcashtg
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yourcashtg

Growth

5,8355,9295,8827 August 2026 — 5,835 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,835 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,839 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,878 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,877 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,882 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,895 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,918 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,927 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,929 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 21 days, net +94. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,821–5,943 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 08:245,929+2
25 Aug 2026, 17:265,927+9
22 Aug 2026, 20:285,918+23
19 Aug 2026, 20:345,895+13
16 Aug 2026, 16:455,882+5
13 Aug 2026, 08:535,877-1
10 Aug 2026, 14:415,878+39
7 Aug 2026, 17:075,839+4
7 Aug 2026, 10:005,835no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:495,835first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 5,929 subscribers
Avg views / post
643
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held16 (7 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total4,503
Reactions total113
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

186 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥13371.5%
custom 60330454572303684454624.7%
😡42.15%
😁31.61%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yourcashtg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC239 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

Давно не выходил голосом, поэтому записал живой апдейт. Поговорил про то, куда движется ИИ, почему одних промптов уже мало, почему меня бомбит от “экспертов” с наборами на 1000 промптов, и зачем я готовлю новый продукт про нормальный mindset работы с AI. Таймкоды: 00:00 — почему решил вернуть голосовые 01:45 — что сейчас происходит с ИИ 02:40 — почему одного чата уже недостаточно 03:30 — почему промпты сами по себ

🔥12custom 60330454572303684454

10 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC466 views18 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

ЖИРНЫЙ ПОДГОН! У кого включены уведомления для моего канала, успеют, другие может и нет! Инструкция как получить HEYGEN PRO на 3 месяца бесплатно - тариф с 2000 кредитов в месяц и сэкономить 300$ 1 - Создаем новый акк или заходим в аккаунт без подписки 2 - В разделе тарифов выбираем pro на 2000 кредитов с ежемесячной оплатой. Стандартная стоимость 99$ 3 - Переходим к оформлению подписки 4 - На этапе оплаты вводим с

🔥13custom 60330454572303684455

8 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC629 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Каждый второй думает, что нейронки это долго, сложно и дорого! Сложно и долго, если ты строишь адронный коллайдер или строишь что-то типо такого: нанобиокриомеддпреаблатаврыаррвырыв - вот это вот! Во всём остальном, для задач операционных, маркетинговых или продажных, я научил ИИ работать как полноценные отделы, не отнимая у меня много времени. Про это поговорим тут https://t.me/yourcashtg/667 Про дорого - отвечу п

custom 60330454572303684458🔥4

7 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC679 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Если ты хоть раз гуглил «топ-1000 промптов» - стоп. Серьёзно. Ты скачал подборку, открыл и..... глаза разбежались. 1000 промптов не работают. 500 промптов не работают. Скиллы, GitHub-ссылки, «секретные» методы — тоже не работают, если ты даже не понимаешь, что с этим делать. Проблема не в том, что информации мало. Её слишком много, и никто не объясняет, как ей пользоваться. Я думаю иначе: не нужны тысячи промптов

🔥7custom 60330454572303684454

6 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC799 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сотни людей спрашивали у меня эту ссылку! Я снимал видео-ролик про курсы от Гугл, который может пройти любой человек. Ссылка 🔗- https://www.coursera.org/google-career-certificates Тем, кто хочет качественное обучение, то советую пройти. Информация круче, чем в курсах по ИИ за 30-100к.

🔥14custom 60330454572303684452

5 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC807 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Фейсбук - МОЖЕТ! Я и забыл, что там есть трафик, честно! Но сейчас приятно удивлен. Я как-то мельком говорил, недавно переработал свой контент-завод, который теперь сам строит автоворонки с ключевыми словами, ai перепиской, и тд, монтирует, публикует, приводит подписчиков, но об этом потом! Могу вам экскурсию провести, если хотите ставьте 🔥

🔥28custom 60330454572303684453

4 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC884 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кажется, последние два года мы писали промпты неправильно. Anthropic выпустила официальный гайд по новой модели Claude Opus 5. И самое неожиданное - большая часть рекомендаций не про то как писать промпты, а в основ как из не надо писать) Многие привычные конструкции сегодня уже не помогают модели. Наоборот - делают её медленнее и дороже. Разбираем главное. Effort Это уровень того, насколько глубоко модель буде

🔥8custom 60330454572303684451

27 Jul 2026, 13:56 UTC968 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

КОРОЧЕ, я нарк*ман. 🥶 Друзья ОСТОРОЖНО - Вайбкодинг затягивает! Поймал себя на мысли, что у меня задачи плавно из маркетинговых, стали вайбкодинговыми. Конечно, маркетинг бекграунд играет свою роль. Но даже на скрине видно как часто стали пилиться проекты на моем github. Чем мне нравятся нейросети? Я работаю с ними уже почти 4 года, и каждый месяц у меня случаются новая ИИ "магия"! Сейчас попробую объяснить: -

🔥11custom 60330454572303684455😁2

21 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC≈1,170 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В эти выходные провёл тренинг для сообщества «Точка опоры». Запустили рубрику Дайджест про ИИ, так как каждую неделю выходят новые ИИшки и просто одному не возможно успевать за всем. Разобрали нашумевшие ИИ обновления за последние 2 недели! Напоминаю что у нас есть чат, в котором мы общаемся про ИИ: https://t.me/+iME5KbGRisYwYmZi

🔥6custom 60330454572303684455😁1😡1

15 Jul 2026, 18:45 UTC≈1,380 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Первое устройство от OpenAI это клавиатура "Codex Micro" для управления Кодексом. Кнопка для нового чата, микрофона, крутилка для уровня размышлений. Подсветка нового чата, ожидания агента, короче кайф! Цена: 230$ https://openai.com/supply/co-lab/work-louder/

🔥4😡3custom 60330454572303684451

15 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC≈1,200 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Забираем $100 в ChatGPT credits за пост в X Что нужно сделать. Написать пост о GPT-5.6: поделиться опытом, показать, что создали с моделью, или честно сравнить ее с другими. После этого указать email, привязанный к ChatGPT, и вставить прямую ссылку на публикацию в форму OpenAI. Кто может участвовать. Пользователи с активной подпиской ChatGPT Go, Plus или Pro. Подписку можно оформить в день подачи заявки. Главное о

🔥4custom 60330454572303684451

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @yourcashtg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 618,176 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Паша Вин про ИИ | Фабрика Денег” (@yourcashtg), 5,929 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yourcashtg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.