7 measurements spanning 17 days, net +47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,729–1,790 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 04:55
1,783
+12
25 Aug 2026, 15:38
1,771
+3
22 Aug 2026, 13:26
1,768
+6
18 Aug 2026, 18:33
1,762
+4
15 Aug 2026, 17:29
1,758
+17
11 Aug 2026, 23:02
1,741
+5
11 Aug 2026, 06:45
1,736
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.99%
avg views ÷ 1,783 subscribers
Avg views / post
89.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
6.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
18 (23 June 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
89
Reactions total
6
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 05s
Average length
49s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
139 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
60
43.2%
❤
41
29.5%
❤🔥
10
7.19%
😁
8
5.76%
⚡
6
4.32%
👍
5
3.60%
😍
3
2.16%
🏆
2
1.44%
🤩
2
1.44%
🥰
2
1.44%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I think you already know that words like
twenty
plenty
internet
etc.
are very often pronounced without /t/.
💡The rule is simple: we omit /t/ after /n/ after a stressed vowel
⚡️ What might come as a shock though is this rule works in some less frequent words too. That’s where hearing a word without /t/ might sound unusual.
✅ Watch to the short video below and notice a word that’s first pronounced with /t/ and the…
Well, I poured my SOUL into this one.
I do have a lot to say about controlling your skill (any skill) in a spontaneous setting, and I really think this mini-article can help a lot of you guys to progress faster.
Looking forward to your reactions and comments🔥❤️
https://teletype.in/@youraccentcoach/How-to-control-it-all
Tell me 🧐
If you’re on this channel, it means you’ve been trying to improve your pronunciation one way or another
And I bet sometimes it feels like you’re stuck — so this week I’d like to try to help you get UNstuck.
💡 In the poll below, choose what kind of thoughts run in your head when you feel like there’s no progress.
I’ll pick the one that gets most votes and address it in a breakdown later this week 🔥
Have you seen the Odyssey yet?🌊
Even if you haven’t —or not going to, you probably will find yourself in a conversation about this movie soon. No escape.
To help you master the Odyssey talk, I’ve prepared a short lesson where I break down the pronunciation of the trickiest words from the story (mostly names)
💡Watch it and repeat the words along with me. Some of the pronunciations are really surprising ☺️
Enjoy ✨
This is your -absolutely unserious- reminder that different accents or speaking styles perform different functions 😄
Being able to switch accordingly goes a long way!
☀️ Wanted to share a couple of mid-summer updates with you all
1
I won another, seventh, Best Speaker award with my spontaneous evaluation speech: I had to listen to all of the speakers of the evening and craft a speech on the go commenting on their use of language and literary devices. Exciting 🥳
2
I challenged myself to do the most iconic 10K race in London and set my first personal benchmark 🏃♂️
3
I finished c…
Here’s a great pronunciation drill for you
Since this video has already reached 21k views and keeps blowing up, I decided to post a brief follow up on here
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️
Let’s work on the “you’re going to want to…” construction
1️⃣ First up, it’s is such a great way to soften your advice and create what we could call persuasive undertone.
Compare:
1. You should do this (direct)
2. You’re going to want to do this…
Ouch, this one might hurt a little because WHY? Why on earth would some words have some really unpredictable pronunciations?😭
Watch this video to find out the right way to pronounce -able words like
▪️applicable
▪️comparable
▪️admirable
▪️preferable
▪️variable
Leave your 🔥 if this was a useful discovery
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @your_accent_coach. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Learn English Speaking @EnglishUSA_1 · 156,440 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 24 August 2026
Learn Spoken English Vocabulary @Learni_Spoken_English_Vocabulary · 226,631 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
English Vocabulary | Vocabularies @Vocabulix · 130,117 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“American Accent Lab” (@your_accent_coach), 1,783 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/your_accent_coach.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
