Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

YOUNG DIOR

@young_diorka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,071subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002707254177
TypeChannel
Username@young_diorka
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/young_diorka

Growth

1,0711,0861,078.58 August 2026 — 1,086 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,086 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,080 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,071 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,069–1,088 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 12:051,071-9
12 Aug 2026, 03:211,080-6
8 Aug 2026, 21:501,086no change
8 Aug 2026, 20:301,086first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 14 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
69.4%
avg views ÷ 1,071 subscribers
Avg views / post
743
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held15 (14 March 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,971
Reactions total201
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,236 reactions across 13 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 521780637176799439945136.5%
16313.2%
👾13611.0%
custom 53707801875898770381159.30%
custom 5321527173381646148957.69%
custom 5264720883657775592735.91%
🔥715.74%
🍓383.07%
custom 5442926726105552731342.75%
custom 5210821964670721376211.70%
custom 5211176222163230962100.809%
custom 520869693511173911770.566%
custom 544284053470185473770.566%
custom 521102012587182550650.405%
custom 542706565239958936850.405%
custom 544312184646981044230.243%
custom 525589762926236833720.162%

Custom emoji. 13 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,236reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
97
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 15 we hold a reading for · 53%
Most on one post
33
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @young_diorka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 March 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 04:47 UTC≈1,370 views193 reactions15 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ah ya Neymar

103custom 521780637176799439940👾33custom 52086969351117391177custom 54428405347018547376custom 54270656523995893684

Signed 『𝒹𝒾𝑜𝓇𝒸𝒽𝒾𝓀』

17 Jul 2026, 19:31 UTC≈1,200 views8 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026

у кого прем ребят

6custom 52178063717679943991custom 54270656523995893681

Signed 『𝒹𝒾𝑜𝓇𝒸𝒽𝒾𝓀』

26 Jun 2026, 12:33 UTC≈2,090 views80 reactions25 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Безнаказанность рождает вседозволенность

43🔥19🍓17custom 54428405347018547371

Signed 『𝒹𝒾𝑜𝓇𝒸𝒽𝒾𝓀』

10 Jun 2026, 21:03 UTC≈2,420 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

так от 1 до 100 пишите, выберу 5

6🔥5custom 52178063717679943991

Signed 『𝒹𝒾𝑜𝓇𝒸𝒽𝒾𝓀』

13 May 2026, 22:14 UTC≈3,980 views91 reactions33 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

michal palych. well, how's the money?

🔥44🍓21👾17custom 52178063717679943994custom 532152717338164614841

Signed 『𝒹𝒾𝑜𝓇𝒸𝒽𝒾𝓀』

11 May 2026, 21:38 UTC≈2,930 views196 reactionsread 8 August 2026

короче родня, расклад такой, если конечно будет актива и норм прихода то, буду розыгрывать 11 айфон новый, я просто для работы купил, а по итогу кроме того как его включать я больше нихуя не делал. если кто-то выйграет с других городов могу доставкой или просто бабки кинуть. так что как хотите или нет? реакций если хотите

custom 5217806371767994399109custom 532152717338164614847👾334🔥3

Signed 『𝒹𝒾𝑜𝓇𝒸𝒽𝒾𝓀』

3 May 2026, 12:42 UTC≈2,750 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👾9custom 52178063717679943996custom 53215271733816461486

Signed 『𝒹𝒾𝑜𝓇𝒸𝒽𝒾𝓀』

26 Apr 2026, 18:46 UTC≈2,880 views92 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

we'll still come back

custom 521780637176799439944👾24custom 532152717338164614824

Signed 『𝒹𝒾𝑜𝓇𝒸𝒽𝒾𝓀』

24 Apr 2026, 13:02 UTC≈2,430 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👾20custom 532152717338164614814custom 521780637176799439913

Signed 『𝒹𝒾𝑜𝓇𝒸𝒽𝒾𝓀』

2 Apr 2026, 22:00 UTC≈3,650 views71 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 526472088365777559229custom 521780637176799439917custom 537078018758987703816custom 52108219646707213764custom 54429267261055527314custom 54431218464698104421

Signed 『𝒹𝒾𝑜𝓇𝒸𝒽𝒾𝓀』

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @young_diorka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 810,980 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“YOUNG DIOR” (@young_diorka), 1,071 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/young_diorka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.